STABLE-2007 is a measure of risk-relevant propensities for adult males convicted of a sexual offense. This meta-analysis evaluated the ability of STABLE-2007 and its items to discriminate between recidivists and nonrecidivists, and the extent to which STABLE-2007 improves prediction over and above Static-99R. Based on 21 studies (12 unique samples, N = 6,955), we found that STABLE-2007 was significantly and incrementally related to sexual recidivism, violent (nonsexual) recidivism, violent (including sexual) recidivism, and any crime. Scores on STABLE-2007 items and the three STABLE-2000 attitude items also discriminated between individuals who sexually reoffended and those who did not sexually reoffend. These findings support the use of STABLE-2007 in applied risk assessment practice and the interpretation of STABLE-2007 items as indicators of treatment and supervision targets.
AllisonP. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
2.
ArcherR. P.Buffington-VollumJ. K.StrednyR. V.HandelR. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84-94. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
3.
BabchishinK. M. (2013). Sex offenders do change on risk-relevant propensities: Evidence from a longitudinal study of the Acute-2007 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved from https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/theses/27626.pdf
4.
BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.BlaisJ. (2016). Less is more: Using Static-2002R subscales to predict violent and general recidivism among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 187-217. doi:10.1177/1079063215569544
5.
BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M. (2012). Even highly correlated measures can add incrementally to predicting recidivism among sex offenders. Assessment, 19, 442-461. doi:10.1177/1073191112458312
6.
BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.VanZuylenH. (2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 45-66. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x
7.
BabchishinK. M.MerdianH. L.BartelsR. M.PerkinsD. (2018). Child sexual exploitation materials offenders: A review. European Psychologist, 23, 130-143. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000326
8.
BlaisJ.ForthA. E. (2014). Prosecution-retained versus court-appointed experts: Comparing and contrasting risk assessment reports in preventative detention hearings. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 531-543. doi:10.1037/lhb0000082
9.
BontaJ. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In HarlandA. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
10.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley
11.
BourgonG.MugfordR.HansonR. K.ColigadoM. (2018). Offender risk assessment practices vary across Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60, 167-205. doi:10.3138/cjccj.2016-0024
12.
BrankleyA. E. (2019). A taxometric analysis of pedophilia in adult males convicted of sexual offences: Evidence for a taxon (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
13.
BrankleyA. E.HelmusL.-M.HansonR. K. (2017). STABLE-2007 evaluator workbook: Updated recidivism rates (includes combinations with Static-99R, Static-2002R, and Risk Matrix 2000). Unpublished report, Public Safety Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
14.
BrikenP.MullerJ. L. (2014). Beurteilung der schuldfahigkeit bei paraphiler storung; kann der schweregrad der storung mithilfe von kriterien aus prognoseinstrumenten erfasst werden? [Assessment of criminal responsibility in paraphilic disorder: Can the severity of the disorder be assessed with items of standardized prognostic instruments?]. Der Nervenarzt, 85, 304-311. doi:10.1007/s00115-013-3901-x
15.
Brouillette-AlarieS.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23, 96-111. doi:10.1177/1073191114568114
16.
Brouillette-AlarieS.HansonR. K. (2015). Comparaison de deux mesures d’évaluation du risque de récidive des délinquants sexuels. [Comparison of two assessment measures of recidivism for sex offenders]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 47, 292-304. doi:10.1037/cbs0000019
17.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ.HansonR. K. (2018). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30, 676-704. doi:10.1177/1079063217691965
18.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
19.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
20.
*CraissatiJ.BlundellR. (2013). A community service for high-risk mentally disordered sex offenders: A follow-up study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1178-1200. doi:10.1177/0886260512468235 [Sample 8]
21.
*EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacleanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 5-28. doi:10.1177/1079063211403164 [Sample 7.3]
22.
*EherR.OlverM. E.HeurixI.SchillingF.RettenbergerM. (2015). Predicting reoffense in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment predicting reoffense in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 571-580. doi:10.1037/lhb0000144 [Sample 7.4]
23.
*EherR.RettenbergerM.GaunersdorferK.Haubner-MacLeanT.MatthesA.SchillingF.MokrosA. (2013). Über die treffsicherheit der standardisierten risikoeinschätzungsverfahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer sicherungsmaßnahme entlassenen sexualstraftätern [On the accuracy of the standardardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 7, 264-272. doi:10.1007/s11757-013-0212-9 [Sample 9]
24.
*EherR.RettenbergerM.MatthesA.SchillingF. (2010). Stable dynamic risk factors in child sexual abusers: The incremental predictive power of narcissistic personality traits beyond the Static-99/STABLE-2007 priority categories on sexual reoffense. Sexual Offender Treatment, 10, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/2-2010_02.html [Sample 7.1]
25.
*EtzlerS.EherR.RettenbergerM. (2018). Dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Validity and dimensional structure of the STABLE-2007. Assessment, 27(4), 822-839. doi:10.1177/1073191118754705 [Sample 7.5]
26.
FernandezY.HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K.SparksJ. (2014). STABLE-2007 coding manual—Revised 2014. Unpublished report, Public Safety Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
27.
HansonR. K. (1998). What do we know about sexual offender risk assessment?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 50-72. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.50
28.
HansonR. K. (2008). What statistics should we use to report predictive accuracy?Crime Scene, 14, 15-17
29.
HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.HelmusL.-M.ThorntonD.PhenixA. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological Assessment, 29, 582-597. doi:10.1037/pas0000371
30.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.-M.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.66.2.348
33.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194. doi:10.1177/107906320201400207
34.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism (User Report 1998-01). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from www.ps-sp.gc.ca/res/cor/rep
35.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001002
*HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M.BabchishinK. M.ZabarauckasC. L. (2017). Risk assessment and recidivism information of sex offenders in the Province of British Columbia [Data file]. [Sample 2.2]
38.
HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M.ThorntonD. (2010). Predicting recidivism among sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 198-211. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9180-1
39.
*HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M.HarrisA. J. R. (2015). Assessing the risk and needs of supervised sexual offenders: A prospective study using STABLE-2007, Static-99R, and Static-2002R. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1205-1224. doi:10.1177/0093854815602094 [Sample 1.5]
40.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
41.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for individuals convicted of sexual offences: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333
HansonR. K.ThorntonD.HelmusL.-M.BabchishinK. M. (2016). What sexual recidivism rates are associated with Static-99R and Static-2002R scores?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 218-252. doi:10.1177/1079063215574710
46.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 198-210. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07306.x
47.
HartS. D.KroppP. R.LawsD. R.KlaverJ.LoganC.WattK. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk for sexual violence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: The Institute Against Family Violence
48.
HawesS. W.BoccacciniM. T.MurrieD. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Psychological Assessment, 25, 233-243. doi:10.1037/a0030391
49.
HelmusL.-M.BabchishinK. M. (2016). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 8-25. doi:10.1177/0093854816678898
50.
*HelmusL.-M.BabchishinK. M.BlaisJ. (2012). Predictive accuracy of dynamic risk factors for aboriginal and non-aboriginal sex offenders: An exploratory comparison using STABLE-2007. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 856-876. doi:10.1177/0306624X11414693 [Sample 1.3]
51.
*HelmusL.-M.HansonR. K. (2012, October). Dynamic risk assessment using STABLE-2007: Updated follow-up and new findings from the dynamic supervision project. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Denver, CO. [Sample 1.2]
52.
HelmusL. M.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.MannR. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 34-53. doi:10.1177/1524838012462244
53.
*HelmusL.-M.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.ThorntonD. (2015). Sex offender risk assessment with the Risk Matrix 2000: Validation and guidelines for combining with the STABLE-2007. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21, 136-122. doi:10.1080/13552600.2013.870241 [Sample 1.4]
54.
HelmusL.-M.HansonR. K.ThorntonD.BabchishinK. M.HarrisA. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 39, 1148-1171. doi:10.1177/0093854812443648
55.
HelmusL.-M.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2011). Assessing the risk of older individuals convicted of sexual offences: Developing the Static-99R and Static-2002R (Corrections User Report 2011-01). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada
56.
HelmusL.-M.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older individuals convicted of sexual offences: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
57.
HermannC. A.McPhailI. V.HelmusL.-M.HansonR. K. (2017). Emotional congruence with children is associated with sexual deviancy in sexual offenders against children. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1311-1334. doi:10.1177/0306624X15620830
58.
HigginsJ.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
59.
HowardP. D. (2017). The effect of sample heterogeneity and risk categorization on area under the curve predictive validity metrics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 103-120. doi:0093854816678899
60.
HsuK. J.BaileyJ. M. (2017). Autopedophilia: Erotic-target identity inversions in men sexually attracted to children. Psychological Science, 28, 115-123. doi:10.1177/0956797616677082
61.
HumphreysL. G.SwetsJ. A. (1991). Comparison of predictive validities measured with biserial correlations and ROCs of signal detection theory. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 316-321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.316
62.
KafkaM. P. (2010). Hypersexual disorder: A proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 377-400. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9574-7
63.
KelleyS. M.AmbroziakG.ThorntonD.BarahalR. M. (2018). How do professionals assess sexual recidivism risk? An updated survey of practices. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 32(1), 3-29. doi:10.1177/1079063218800474
64.
KraemerH. C.KazdinA. E.OffordD. R.KesslerR. C.JensenP. S.KuplerD. J. (1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337-343. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160065009
65.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310
66.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1-69. doi:0192-3234/2001/0028-0001
67.
LehmannR. J.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.Gallasch-NemitzF.BiedermannJ.DahleK. P. (2013). Interpreting multiple risk scales for sex offenders: Evidence for averaging. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1019-1024. doi:10.1037/a0033098
68.
*LoomanJ.AbracenJ. (2012, October). Long-term follow-up of two groups of sex offenders. Presentation at the 31st Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Denver, CO [Sample 10]
69.
*LoomanJ.GoldsteinJ. (2015, October). Incremental validity of the STABLE-2007 with the Static-99R. Presentation at the 34th Annual Research and Treatment Conference for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Montreal, QC [Sample 3 and 11]
70.
*LussierP.Deslauriers-VarinN.RâtelT. (2010). A descriptive profile of high-risk sex offenders under in intensive supervision in the province of British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 71-91. doi:10.1177/0306624X0832323 [Sample 2.1]
71.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
72.
McGrathR. J.CummingG.BurchardB.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press
73.
McGrathR. J.LasherM. P.CummingG. F. (2012). The sex offender treatment intervention and progress scale (SOTIPS): Psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with static-99R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 431-458. doi:10.1177/1079063211432475
McPhailI. V.HermannC. A.NunesK. L. (2013). Emotional congruence with children and sexual offending against children: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 737-749. doi:10.1037/a0033248
76.
MewsA.Di BellaL.PurverM. (2017). Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme. London, England: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/publications
77.
NealT. M. S.GrissoT. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1406-1421. doi:10.1177/0093854814548449
78.
OlverM. E.MundtJ. C.ThorntonD.Beggs ChristoffersonS. M.KingstonD. A.SowdenJ. N.. . . WongS. C. P. (2018). Using the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version in sexual violence risk assessments: Updated risk categories and recidivism estimates from a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 30, 941-955. doi:10.1037/pas0000538
79.
PhenixA.HelmusL.-M.HansonR. K. (2016). Static-99R & Static-2002R evaluators’ workbook. Unpublished report, Public Safety Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
80.
*RettenbergerM.MatthesA.SchillingF.EherR. (2011). Die validität dynamisch-veränderbarer risikofaktoren bei der vorhersage einschlägiger rückfälle pädoseueller straftäter [The validity of dynamic and changeable risk factors for the prediction of sexual recidivism in a sample of pedosexual offenders]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 5, 45-53. doi:10.1007/s11757-010-0086-z [Sample 7.2]
81.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
82.
RuscioJ. (2008). A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods, 13, 19-30. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.19
83.
RyanJ.WilsonN.KilgourG.ReynoldsN. (2014). Balancing efficiency and accuracy: Guidelines for the psychological assessment of extended supervision orders for child sex offenders in New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 139-157. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.793154
84.
*SaumS. (2004). A comparison of an actuarial risk prediction measure (Static-99) and a stable dynamic prediction measure (Stable-2000) in making risk predictions for a group of sexual offenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Fielding Institute, SantaBarbara, CA [Sample 5]
85.
SchulzeR. (2007). Current methods for meta-analysis: Approaches, issues, and developments. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 215, 90-103. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.90
86.
SetoM. C.EkeA. W. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law and Human Behavior, 39, 416-429. doi:10.1037/lhb0000128
87.
*SmethA. (2013). Evaluating risk assessments among sex offenders: A comparative analysis of static and dynamic factors (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Carleton University. Retrieved from https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/theses/27517_1.pdf [Sample 4]
*SowdenJ. N.OlverM. E. (2017). Use of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version and the STABLE-2007 to assess dynamic sexual violence risk in a sample of treated sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29, 293-303. doi:10.1037/pas0000345 [Sample 12.2]
90.
SteyerbergE. W.VickersA. J.CookN. R.GerdsT.GonenM.ObuchowskiN.. . . KattanM. W. (2010). Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for some traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology, 21, 128-138. doi:101097/EDE0b013e3181c30fb2
91.
StockdaleK. C.OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale–Youth version in a diverse sample of violent young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 114-138. doi:10.1177/0093854813496999
92.
ThorntonD. (2010). Scoring guide for Risk Matrix 2000.10/SVC. Unpublished document.
93.
ThorntonD.KnightR. A. (2015). Construction and validation of SRA-FV need assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 360-375. doi:10.1177/1079063213511120
94.
ThorntonD.MannR.WebsterS.BludL.TraversR.FriendshipC.EriksonM. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. In PrentkyR. A.JanusE. S.SetoM. C. (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 989. Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (pp. 225-235). New York: New York Academy of Sciences
95.
van den BergJ. W.SmidW.SchepersK.WeverE.van BeekD.JanssenE.GijsL. (2018). The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 30, 179-191. doi:10.1037/pas0000454
96.
WalkerM.O’RourkeM. (2013). Probation officers’ experience of using Risk Matrix 2000 and Stable & Acute 2007 when supervising sex offenders living in the community. Irish Probation Journal, 10, 162-176. Available from http://www.probation.ie
97.
WatsonT.VessJ. (2007). Risk assessment of child victim sex offenders on extended supervision in New Zealand. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 18, 235-247. doi:10.1080/14789940601116267
98.
*WebbL.CraissatiJ.KeenS. (2007). Characteristics of internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 449-465. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9063-2 [Sample 6]
99.
WheelerJ. G.GeorgeW. H.StephensK. (2005). Assessment of sexual offenders: A model for integrating dynamic risk assessment and relapse prevention approaches. In DonavanD. M.MarlattG. A. (Eds.), Assessment of addictive behaviors (2nd ed., pp. 392-424). New York, NY: Guilford Press
100.
WongS.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2003). The violence risk scale: Sexual offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
