Identification and application of the current research evidence to a clinical problem is a goal reflected in professional codes and institutional mission statements. The use of expert opinions and traditions is no longer clinically or legally defensible in an era of using emerging evidence. Application of current research evidence is the emerging standard of care for all health care personnel, including psychiatric mental health care. The emergence of evidence-based practice as the new standard of care obliges all health care providers to use the latest research evidence. The need to make an intervention based on the highest level of evidence mandates that clinicians understand levels of research evidence and how the different classification systems of evidence compare. In this article, the levels of research evidence are reviewed to provide a framework for determining the best evidence to use as a basis for clinical interventions. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc, 2008; 14(3), 181–187. DOI: 10.1177/1078390308321220
ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. ( 2008). Manual for ACC/AHA guideline writing committees: Section II: Tools and methods for creating guidelines. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://circ.ahajournals.org/manual/manual_IIstep6.shtml
2.
Adeyemo, W.L., Akinwande, J.A., & Bamgbose, B.O. (2007). Evidence-based dental practice: Part II. Levels and quality of evidence, and research designs. Nigerian Quarterly Journal of Hospital Medicine, 17(3), 120-125.
3.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ( 2002). Evidence report/technology assessment: Number 47: Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/strengthtp.htm
Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P.A., Eccles, M., Falck-Ytter, Y., Flottorp, S., et al. (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 328(7454), 1490.
6.
Baldwin, D.S. (2006). Evidence-based guidelines for anxiety disorders: Can they improve clinical outcomes?CNS Spectrums, 11(10 Suppl. 12), 34-39.
7.
Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J., & Cahill, J. (2006). A core approach to practice-based evidence: A brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE system . Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 6(1), 3-15.
8.
Beck, C.T. (2002). Postpartum depression: A metasynthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 453-472.
9.
Bliss-Holtz, J. (2007). Evidence-based practice: A primer for action. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 30(4), 165-182.
10.
Cochrane, A. (1972). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Royal society of Medicine Press.
11.
Crowther, M.A., & Cook, D.J. (2007). Trials and tribulations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Hematology, 2007, 493-497.
12.
Devereaux, P.J., & Yusuf, S. (2003). The evolution of the randomized controlled trial and its role in evidence-based decision making. Journal of Internal Medicine, 254(2), 105-113.
13.
Egger, M., Smith, G.D., & Sterne, J.A. (2001). Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Clinical Medicine, 1(6), 478-484.
14.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Hofstetter, S., Shell, L., & Johnston, L. (2005). Teaching EBP: Getting to the gold: How to search for the best evidence. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing , 2(4), 207-211.
15.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B.M., & Schultz, A. (2005). Transforming healthcare from the inside out: Advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 335-344.
16.
Fineout-Overholt, E., & Johnston, L. (2006). Teaching EBP: Implementation of evidence: Moving from evidence to action. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing , 3(4), 194-200.
17.
Fisher, C.G., & Wood, K.B. (2007). Introduction to and techniques of evidence-based medicine. Spine, 32(19 Suppl.), S66-S72.
18.
Goldsmith, M.R., Bankhead, C.R., & Austoker, J. (2007). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(3), 262-270.
19.
Guyatt, G.H., Meade, M.O., Jaeschke, R.Z., Cook, D.J., & Haynes, R.B. (2000). Practitioners of evidence based care. British Medical Journal, 320(7240), 954-955.
20.
Harden, A., Garcia, J., Oliver, S., Rees, R., Shepherd, J., Brunton, G., et al. (2004). Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: An example from public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(9), 794-800.
21.
Hart, T., Fann, J.R., & Novack, T.A. (2008). The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(1), 1-21.
22.
Joseph, A.C. (2008). What's the significance of evidenced-based practice? Do we really need levels of evidence?Urologic Nursing , 28(1), 11-12.
23.
Lesage, A. (2007). Les programmes de premier episode de schizophrenie et une medecine fondee sur les donnees factuelles: Un cas de syndrome des habits de l'empereur? [Programs for first onset psychosis and evidence-based medicine: A case of the syndrome of the emperor's new clothes]. Sante Mentale Au Quebec, 32(1), 333-349.
24.
March, J.S., Silva, S.G., Compton, S., Shapiro, M., Califf, R., & Krishnan, R. (2005). The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry . American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(5), 836-846.
25.
Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2002). Evidence-based practice: Key steps in implementing evidence-based practice: Asking compelling, searchable questions and searching for the best evidence. Pediatric Nursing , 28, 262-263, 266.
26.
Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2005). Evidence based practice in nursing and health care: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
27.
Moffitt, T.E., Arseneault, L., Jaffee, S.R., Kim-Cohen, J., Koenen, K.C., Odgers, C.L., et al. (2008). Research review: DSM-V conduct disorder: Research needs for an evidence base. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 49(1), 3-33.
28.
Ogilvie, D., Egan, M., Hamilton, V., & Petticrew, M. (2005). Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: How low should you go? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(10), 886-892.
29.
Ogilvie, D., Fayter, D., Petticrew, M., Sowden, A., Thomas, S., Whitehead, M., et al. (2008). The harvest plot: A method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 8.
30.
Petrisor, B.A., Keating, J., & Schemitsch, E. (2006). Grading the evidence: Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Injury, 37(4), 321-327.
31.
Phillips, B., Ball, C., Sackett, D., Badenoch, D., Straus, S., Haynes, B., et al. (2001). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
32.
Ruscio, J. (2008). A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods, 13(1), 19-30.
Sanchez-Meca, J., & Marin-Martinez, F. (2008). Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 13(1), 31-48.
35.
Schlander, M. (2008). Is NICE infallible? A qualitative study of its assessment of treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) . Current Medical Research and Opinion, 24(2), 515-535.
36.
Shaneyfelt, T., Baum, K.D., Bell, D., Feldstein, D., Houston, T.K., Kaatz, S., et al. (2006). Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(9), 1116-1127.
37.
Sharma, S. (2008). Levels of evidence. Evidence-Based Ophthalmology, 9(1), 9-10.
38.
Souza, J.P., Pileggi, C., & Cecatti, J.G. (2007). Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: An analytic survey. Reproductive Health, 4, 3.
39.
Stuart, G.W. (2001). Evidence-based psychiatric nursing practice: Rhetoric or reality. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association , 7(4), 103-111.
40.
Suppes, T., Rush, A.J., Dennehy, E.B., Crismon, M.L., Kashner, T.M., Toprac, M.G., et al. (2003). Texas Medication Algorithm Project, Phase 3 (TMAP-3): Clinical results for patients with a history of mania. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(4), 370-382.
41.
Thomas, B.H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., & Micucci, S. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 1(3), 176-184.
42.
U.S. Preventative Task Force. (2003). U.S. preventive services task force ratings: Strength of recommendations and quality of evidence: Guide to clinical preventive services, third edition: Periodic updates. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/ratings.htm
43.
Waddell, C., Hua, J.M., Garland, O.M., Peters, R.D., & McEwan, K. (2007). Preventing mental disorders in children: A systematic review to inform policy-making. Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique, 98(3), 166-173.
44.
West, S., King, V., Carey, T.S., Lohr, K.N., McKoy, N., Sutton, S.F., et al. (2002). Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Summary) , 47(47), 1-11.
45.
Zwahlen, M., Renehan, A., & Egger, M. (2008). Meta-analysis in medical research: Potentials and limitations. Urologic Oncology, 26(3), 320-329.
