Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Comparative Performance of Municipal General Governments and Collaborative Municipal Governance Structures: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Crime Control and Prevention
This study examines whether general-purpose governments or their collaborative partnerships with subgovernment units deliver crime control more effectively. In some jurisdictions, voters can establish subgovernment units to enhance local service delivery, but systematic comparisons between municipalities with and without these units remain limited. Collaborative subunit governance structures can be designed to expand and safeguard resources for salient services, which, over time, results in better performance than general-purpose governments without subunits. Using a difference-in-differences design with matching, we find that municipalities with Crime Control and Prevention Districts (CCPDs) experience greater reductions in violent crime than comparable municipalities without CCPDs, although the effects diminish over time. The impact on property crime is limited, and no significant effect is found for homicide. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing performance evaluation and structural adjustments in evolving local governance arrangements to ensure more effective local service delivery.
AliMir UsmanNicholson-CrottySean. 2021. “Examining the Accountability-Performance Link: The Case of Citizen Oversight of Police.” Public Performance & Management Review44 (3): 523–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1806086.
2.
AnBrian Y.2021. “Bottom-up or Top-Down Local Service Delivery? Assessing the Impacts of Special Districts as Community Governance Model.” The American Review of Public Administration51 (1): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020933968.
3.
BeckerGary S.1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy76 (2): 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394.
BriffaultRichard.1999. “A Government for Our Time? Business Improvement Districts and Urban Governance.” Columbia Law Review99 (2): 365–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123583.
7.
BrooksLeah.2008. “Volunteering to Be Taxed: Business Improvement Districts and the Extra-Governmental Provision of Public Safety.” Journal of Public Economics92 (1): 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.07.002.
8.
CallawayBrantlySant’AnnaPedro H. C.. 2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods.” Journal of Econometrics225 (2): 200–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.
ChaineySpencer.2022. “A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Forensic Property Marking in Decreasing Burglaries.” Security Journal35 (3): 966–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00308-z.
11.
ChalfinAaronMcCraryJustin. 2018. “Are U.S. Cities Underpoliced? Theory and Evidence.” Review of Economics and Statistics100 (1): 167–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00694.
12.
ClutterJeffrey E.HendersonSamanthaHabermanCory P.. 2019. “The Impact of Business Improvement District Proximity on Street Block Robbery Counts Basic Research.” Crime and Delinquency65 (8): 1050–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719834559
13.
CollinsBrian K. 2011. “Agency Forms and Reforms: Institutional Design for State-Centric Networks and Block Grant Administration.” In Networked Governance: The Future of Intergovernmental Management, edited by MeekJack W.ThurmaierKurt, 127–145. Washington, DC, USA: CQ Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349473.n10.
14.
CollinsBrian K.KimHyun Joon. 2009. “Are Satisfied Citizens Willing to Pay More? Public Sector Consumerism as Equitable Social Exchange.” Public Money & Management29 (2): 109–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540960902768004.
15.
CollinsBrian K.KimHyun JoonTaoJie. 2019. “Managing for Citizen Satisfaction: Is Good Not Enough?” Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs5 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.5.1.21-38.
EllenIngrid GouldSchwartzAmy EllenVoicuIoanBrooksLeahHoytLorlene. 2007. “The Impact of Business Improvement Districts on Property Values: Evidence from New York City [with Comments].” In Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 1–39. New York, NY, USA: Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25067439.
FosterKathryn A.1996. “Specialization in Government: The Uneven Use of Special Districts in Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Affairs Review31 (3): 283–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749603100301.
23.
GarcíaJorge LuisHeckmanJames J.ZiffAnna L.. 2019. “Early Childhood Education and Crime.” Infant Mental Health Journal: Infancy and Early Childhood40 (1): 141–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21759.
24.
GoodmanChristopher B.CarrollDeborah A.. 2023. “Are Special Districts Strategic Complements or Strategic Substitutes?” Public Administration Review84 (4): 623–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13672.
25.
GoodmanChristopher B.LelandSuzanne M.SmirnovaOlga. 2021. “The Consequences of Specialised Governance on Spending and Expansion of Public Transit.” Local Government Studies47 (2): 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1744571.
26.
Goodman-BaconAndrew.2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing.” Journal of Econometrics, Themed Issue: Treatment Effect 1225 (2): 254–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.
27.
GrahamShannon R.MakowskyMichael D.. 2021. “Local Government Dependence on Criminal Justice Revenue and Emerging Constraints.” Annual Review of Criminology4 (1): 311–30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-021824.
28.
GrossmanSeth A.2010a. “Business Improvement Districts: Promise and Performance Editor’s Introduction.” Public Performance & Management Review33 (3): 355–60. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576330303.
29.
GrossmanSeth A.. 2010b. “Reconceptualizing the Public Management and Performance of Business Improvement Districts.” Public Performance & Management Review33 (3): 361–94. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576330304.
30.
HanSeheeMorçölGöktuğHummerDonPetersonSteven A.. 2017. “The Effects of Business Improvement Districts in Reducing Nuisance Crimes: Evidence from Philadelphia.” Journal of Urban Affairs39 (5): 658–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1262691.
31.
HirschmanAlbert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard university press.
32.
HoffmanIanMastEvan. 2019. “Heterogeneity in the Effect of Federal Spending on Local Crime: Evidence from Causal Forests.” Regional Science and Urban Economics78 (2019): 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103463.
33.
HoytLorlene M.2004. “Collecting Private Funds for Safer Public Spaces: An Empirical Examination of the Business Improvement District Concept.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31 (3): 367–80. https://doi.org/10.1068/b29124.
34.
HoytLorlene M.. 2005. “Do Business Improvement District Organizations Make a Difference?: Crime In and Around Commercial Areas in Philadelphia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (2): 185–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05279276.
35.
ImaiKosukeKimIn SongWangErik H.. 2023. “Matching Methods for Causal Inference with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data.” American Journal of Political Science67 (3): 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12685.
KimJisang.2022. “The Effect of Civilian Oversight on Police Organizational Performance: A Quasi-Experimental Study.” The American Review of Public Administration52 (5): 382–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740221098344.
38.
KovandzicTomislav V.SloanJohn J.. 2002. “Police Levels and Crime Rates Revisited: A County-Level Analysis from Florida (1980–1998).” Journal of Criminal Justice30 (1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00123-4
39.
KronkvistKarlIvertAnna-Karin. 2020. “A Winning BID? The Effects of a BID-Inspired Property Owner Collaboration on Neighbourhood Crime Rates in Malmö, Sweden.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety22 (2): 134–52. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-020-00088-5.
40.
LelandSuzanne M.SmirnovaOlga. 2008. “Does Government Structure Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Urban Bus Transit Efficiency.” Journal of Public Transportation11 (1): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.11.1.4.
41.
LinMing-Jen.2009. “More Police, Less Crime: Evidence from US State Data.” International Review of Law and Economics29 (2): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2008.12.003.
42.
MacDonaldJohnGolinelliDanielaStokesRobert J.BluthenthalRicky. 2010. “The Effect of Business Improvement Districts on the Incidence of Violent Crimes.” Original Article. Injury Prevention16 (5): 327–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.024943.
43.
MallettWilliam J.1994. “Managing the Post-Industrial City: Business Improvement Districts in the United States.” Area26 (3): 276–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20003458.
44.
MaloneAaron.2019. “(Im)Mobile and (Un)Successful? A Policy Mobilities Approach to New Orleans’s Residential Security Taxing Districts.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space37 (1): 102–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418779822.
45.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.. 2001. “Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from US Public Education.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11 (3): 271–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003503
MitchellOjmarrhWilsonDavid B.MacKenzieDoris L.. 2012. “The Effectiveness of Incarceration-Based Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews8 (1): i–76. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.18.
48.
MorçölGöktuğKaragozTurgay. 2020. “Accountability of Business Improvement District in Urban Governance Networks: An Investigation of State Enabling Laws.” Urban Affairs Review56 (3): 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418793532.
49.
MorçölGöktuğWolfJames F.. 2010. “Understanding Business Improvement Districts: A New Governance Framework.” Public Administration Review70 (6): 906–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02222.x.
50.
MuchowAshley N.2023. “Community-Oriented Policing and Violent Crime: Evidence from the Los Angeles Community Safety Partnership.” Police Quarterly26 (4): 545–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111231162353.
51.
Nicholson-CrottySeanO’TooleLaurence J.Jr. 2004. “Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Case of Law Enforcement Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh001.
52.
PashaObed.2018. “Can Performance Management Best Practices Help Reduce Crime?” Public Administration Review78 (2): 217–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12856.
53.
PerryJames L.BabitskyTimlynn T.. 1986. “Comparative Performance in Urban Bus Transit: Assessing Privatization Strategies.” Public Administration Review46 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/975443.
54.
PizaEric L.WheelerAndrew P.ConnealyNathan T.FengShun Q.. 2020. “Crime Control Effects of a Police Substation Within a Business Improvement District: A Quasi-Experimental Synthetic Control Evaluation.” Criminology & Public Policy19 (2): 653–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12488.
55.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.. 1985. “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score.” The American Statistician39 (1): 33–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383.
56.
RothJonathanSant’AnnaPedro HCBilinskiAlyssaPoeJohn. 2023. “What’s Trending in Difference-in-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature.” Journal of Econometrics235 (2): 2218–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008.
57.
SchattemanAliciaLiuLi-Yin. 2023. “Measuring What Matters: Comparing Costs and Performance of Municipal Libraries and Library Districts.” Public Library Quarterly42 (4): 373–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2022.2110631.
58.
SchneiderAaron. 2018. Renew Orleans?: Globalized Development and Worker Resistance After Katrina. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
ScutelnicuGina.2014. “Special Districts as Institutional Choices for Service Delivery: Views of Public Officials on the Performance of Community Development Districts in Florida.” Public Administration Quarterly38 (3): 284–316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24372033.
60.
StuartElizabeth A.2010. “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.” Statistical Science : A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics25 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313.
61.
StuartElizabeth A.RubinDonald B.. 2008. “Matching with Multiple Control Groups with Adjustment for Group Differences.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics33 (3): 279–306. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998607306078.
62.
SunLiyangAbrahamSarah. 2021. “Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.” Journal of Econometrics225 (2): 175–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006.
63.
ThornberryTerence P.KearleyBrookGottfredsonDenise C.SlothowerMolly P.DevlinDeanna N.FaderJamie J.. 2018. “Reducing Crime Among Youth at Risk for Gang Involvement: A Randomized Trial.” Criminology & Public Policy17 (4): 953–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12395.
64.
TieboutCharles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
65.
TravisJeremyWaulMichelle. 2002. “Reflections on the Crime Decline: Lessons for the Future?” Proceedings from the Urban Institute Crime Decline Forum, Urban Institute.
66.
VictorMichael I.1977. “Relations Between Known Crime and Police Spending in Large United States Cities.” Sociological Focus10 (2): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1977.10570287.
67.
WelshBrandon C.FarringtonDavid P.DouglasStephen. 2022. “The Impact and Policy Relevance of Street Lighting for Crime Prevention: A Systematic Review Based on a Half-Century of Evaluation Research.” Criminology & Public Policy21 (3): 739–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12585.
ZhaoJihong “Solomon”ScheiderMatthew C.ThurmanQuint. 2002. “Funding Community Policing to Reduce Crime: Have Cops Grants Made a Difference?” Criminology & Public Policy2 (1): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00104.x.
