This study investigates the ex ante as well as ex post impact of a new subway line on housing values in Daegu, Korea where two lines already exist. Housing units are divided into two groups: treatment group versus comparison group based on the distance from the nearest station of the new line. Our results based on Hedonic models in difference-in-differences framework suggest that homes within 500 m from the nearest station of the new line can earn a premium of 99.7 thousand Korean Won (equivalent approximately to 96.3 US dollars) per square metre. However, such a premium from improved accessibility to public transit seems to appear mainly for the homes which are within 500 m from the new line and beyond 5 km from the nearest station of the existing lines. For the homes which are close to existing lines, proximity to the new line stations does not increase residents’ convenience remarkably because people are supposed to easily transfer between the new line and existing lines.
AgostiniCAPalmucciGA (2008) The anticipated capitalization effect of a new metro line on housing prices. Fiscal Studies29(2): 233–256.
2.
AnderssonDShyrOFuJ (2010) Does high-speed rail accessibility influence residential property prices? Hedonic estimates from southern Taiwan. Journal of Transport Geography18(1): 166–174.
3.
ArmstrongRJRodriguezDA (2006) An evaluation of the accessibility benefits of commuter rail in eastern Massachusetts using spatial hedonic price functions. Transportation33(1): 21–43.
4.
BaeCJunMParkH (2003) The impact of Seoul’s subway line 5 on residential property values. Transport Policy10: 85–94.
5.
BowesDIhlanfeldtK (2001) Identifying the impacts of rail transit station on property values. Journal of Urban Economics50: 1–25.
6.
ChoiCYoonH (2004) Analysis of spatial influence of subway construction on price of apartments – Focusing on Seoul subway line 7. Seoul Urban Study5(4): 1–12 [in Korean].
7.
ChoiSSeongH (2011) A study of effects of construction of subway line 9 on price of surrounding apartments – Focusing on effects by stage of construction project. Land Planning46(3): 169–177 [in Korean].
8.
ChoiYKimTParkJ (2008) Development of land value estimation model of Seoul subway station influence areas using CHAID analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Railroad11(5): 504–512 [in Korean].
9.
DebrezionGPelsERietveldP (2011) The impact of rail transport on real estate prices: An empirical analysis of the Dutch housing market. Urban Studies48(5): 997–1015.
10.
DiaoM (2015) Selectivity, spatial autocorrelation and the valuation of transit accessibility. Urban Studies52(1): 159–177.
11.
DiaoMQinYSingT (2016) Negative externalities of rail noise and housing values: Evidence from the cessation of railway operations in Singapore. Real Estate Economics44(4): 878–917.
12.
DuncanM (2011) The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA. Urban Studies48(1): 101–127.
13.
FergusonBGGoldbergMAMarkJ (1988) The pre-service impact of the Vancouver Advanced Light Rail Transit System on Sing family property values. In: ClappJMMessnerSD (eds) Real Estate Market Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group, pp. 78–110.
14.
HenneberryJ (1998) Transport investment and house prices. Journal of Property Valuation & Investment16(2): 144–158.
15.
KhandkerSKoolwalGSamadH (2009) Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington, DC: World Bank.
16.
KimYLeeJ (2010) A study on the integrated law-system for revitalization on the station’s area. Urban Design Institute of Korea2010–10: 515–524 [in Korean].
17.
Korea Transport Institute (2010) 2010 Survey of National Passengers OD. Available at: www.ktdb.go.kr/www/contents.do?key=60 (accessed 2 November 2011).
18.
Korea Transport Institute (2014) Estimation of traffic congestion cost in 2015. Press Release, 23April.
19.
KwonHImYKimH (2001) Factors influencing change in land value of station influence areas according to opening of subway line. Presented at Autumn Conference of Korea Planner’s Association, 19 October 2001, Seoul [in Korean].
20.
LandisJCerveroRGuhathukurtaSet al. (1995) Rail Transit Investments, Real Estate Values, and Land Use Change: A Comparative Analysis of Five California Rail Transit Systems. Research Report No. 48. Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
21.
LeeJKimJ (2014) Negative effects of subway stations on price of surrounding apartments – Focusing on different effects of structure and function of station building. Housing Study22(2): 53–75 [in Korean].
22.
McDonaldJFOsujiCI (1995) The effect of anticipated transportation improvement on residential land values. Regional Science and Urban Economics25: 261–278.
23.
RosenS (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy82(1): 34–55.
24.
StrandJVagnesM (2001) The relationship between property values and railroad proximity: A study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers’ appraisals. Transportation28(2): 137–156.
25.
WeinsteinBClowerT (2002) An Assessment of the DART Light Rail Transit on Taxable Property Valuations and Transit-Oriented Development. Center for Economic Development and Research, University of North Texas, Denton.
26.
YiuCWongS (2005) The effects of expected transport improvements on housing prices. Urban Studies42(1): 113–125.
27.
YooSGangJ (2012) Analysis of effects of spatial structure of station influence areas on land value. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineers32(1): 61–69 [in Korean].
