Abstract
Effective urban policies contribute to new equilibrium patterns, improving environmental amenities and reducing traffic congestion. Nevertheless, residents may find certain urban policies limiting. Thus, it is crucial to evaluate their impacts on different urban outcomes. We use a disaggregated dataset of transacted residential buildings during two events of pricing and unpricing in Tehran and employ the Difference-in-Difference methodology to find the causal effects of these policies on residential housing values. Findings indicate that pricing reduces the housing value by about 7%, while unpricing increases it. Our study contributes to the literature by providing evidence that urban policies may considerably change the valuation patterns of different areas. This work also cautions policymakers in cities dealing with debates over zoning, such as New York and San Francisco, while considering of the impact of different cities’ heterogeneous features.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
