How do city residents assign credit to city officials for good policy outcomes? And, do credit claims by city officials influence how citizens perceive their performance in office? To address these questions, this article turns to matters of public safety in Mexico City, where a substantial reduction in crime coincided with constitutional amendments, triggering intense debate over credit allocation for improving crime between the City government and borough mayors despite the former having sole structural authority over policing. I find that partisanship significantly shapes whether city residents credit the city government or boroughs for crime reduction, while knowledge about how the city is governed does not. Moreover, my findings indicate that borough mayors' credit claims do not enhance perceptions of their performance in office but instead diminish the City government's reputation. These findings underscore that delivering public goods does not guarantee political benefit, nor do deceptive credit claims.
AparicioJavierCornejoRodrigo Castro. 2020. “2018 Elections: A Historical Juncture in Mexico.” Politica y Gobierno27 (2): 1–37.
3.
ArceneauxKevin.2006. “The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?” Political Psychology27 (5): 731–54.
4.
BartelsLarry M.2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24: 117–50.
5.
BrownAdam R.2010. “Are Governors Responsible for the State Economy? Partisanship, Blame, and Divided Federalism.” The Journal of Politics72 (3): 605–15.
6.
BuenoNatália S.2023. “The Timing of Public Policies: Political Budget Cycles and Credit Claiming.” American Journal of Political Science67 (4): 996–1011.
7.
CampbellAngusConversePhillip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CarlinRyan E.LoveGregory J.Martínez-GallardoCecilia. 2015. “Security, Clarity of Responsibility, and Presidential Approval.” Comparative Political Studies48 (4): 438–63.
9.
Castro CornejoRodrigo.2023. “The AMLO Voter: Affective Polarization and the Rise of the Left in Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America15 (1): 96–112.
10.
CruzCesiSchneiderChristina J.. 2017. “Foreign Aid and Undeserved Credit Claiming.” American Journal of Political Science61 (2): 396–408.
11.
CutlerFred.2004. “Government Responsibility and Electoral Accountability in Federations.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism34 (2): 19–38.
12.
CutlerFred.2008. “Whodunnit? Voters and Responsibility in Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science41 (3): 627–54.
13.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2018. “How Attribution Inhibits Accountability: Evidence from Train Delays.” The Journal of Politics80 (4): 1417–22.
14.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2022. “Strategic Government Communication About Performance.” Political Science Research and Methods10 (3): 601–16.
15.
DruckmanJames N.KamCindy D.. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants.” Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science1: 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004.
16.
EntmanRobert M.1989. “How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach.” The Journal of Politics51 (2): 347–70.
17.
GimpelJames G.DyckJoshua J.ShawDaron R.. 2004. “Registrants, Voters, and Turnout Variability Across Neighborhoods.” Political Behavior26 (4): 343–75.
18.
GomezBrad T.WilsonJ. Matthew. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science45 (4): 899–914.
19.
GomezBrad T.WilsonJ. Matthew. 2003. “Causal Attribution and Economic Voting in American Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly56 (3): 271–82.
20.
GonzálezYanildaZarkinJessica. 2024. “Who Governs Policing? Mayors’ Strategic Linkages to Police in Latin American Cities.” Comparative Political Studies. OnlineFirst.
21.
GrahamMatthew H.SinghShikhar. 2024. “An Outbreak of Selective Attribution: Partisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” American Political Science Review118 (1): 423–41.
HaimeAgustinaCantúFrancisco. 2022. “Negative Partisanship in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society64 (1): 72–92.
24.
HaleHenry E.2022. “A ‘Terrific Symbol’: Physical Personalization of Pandemic Relief Enhances Presidential Support.” PS: Political Science & Politics55 (2): 251–6.
25.
HellwigTimothySamuelsDavid. 2008. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science38 (1): 65–90.
26.
HoboltSara B.TilleyJamesWittrockJill. 2013. “Listening to the Government: How Information Shapes Responsibility Attributions.” Political Behavior35: 153–74.
HollandAlisha C.2017. Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KlarSamara.2014. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science58 (3): 687–704.
30.
LaterzoIsabel G.2024. “Progressive Ideology and Support for Punitive Crime Policy: Evidence from Argentina and Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies57 (6): 999–1034.
31.
LeónSandra.2011. “Who is Responsible for What? Clarity of Responsibilities in Multilevel States: The Case of Spain.” European Journal of Political Research50 (1): 80–109.
32.
LeónSandraOrriolsLluis. 2019. “Attributing Responsibility in Devolved Contexts. Experimental Evidence from the UK.” Electoral Studies59 (June): 39–48.
33.
MalhotraNeilKuoAlexander G.. 2008. “Attributing Blame: The Public’s Response to Hurricane Katrina.” The Journal of Politics70 (1): 120–35.
34.
MasulloJuanMorisiDavide. 2024. “The Human Costs of the War on Drugs. Attitudes Towards Militarization of Security in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies57 (6): 887–920.
35.
MoncadaEduardo.2016. “Urban Violence, Political Economy, and Territorial Control: Insights from Medellín.” Latin American Research Review51 (4): 225–48.
36.
MoraesJuan A.BéjarSergio. 2023. “Electoral Volatility and Political Polarization in Developing Democracies: Evidence from Latin America, 1993–2016.” Party Politics29 (4): 636–47.
PocasangreOscar.2022. “The Political Consequences of Long-Term Violence in Mexico.” PhD Diss, Columbia University.
42.
Rabell GarcíaEnrique.2017. “La Reforma Política de la Ciudad de México. Cuestiones Constitucionales.” Revista Mexicana De Derecho Constitucional1 (36): 243–70.
RicoGuillemLiñeiraRobert. 2018. “Pass the Buck if You can: How Partisan Competition Triggers Attribution Bias in Multilevel Democracies.” Political Behavior40 (1): 175–96.
45.
RudolphThomas J.2006. “Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility Judgments.” Political Psychology27 (1): 99–122.
46.
Sánchez-SibonyOmar. 2024. “Why Latin American Parties Are Not Coming Back.” Latin American Politics and Society66 (3): 164–93.
47.
SarsfieldRodolfoMoncagattaPaoloRobertsKenneth M.. 2024. “Introduction: The New Polarization in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society66 (2): 1–23.
48.
SteinRobert M.BickersKenneth N.. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.” The Journal of Politics56 (2): 377–99.
49.
TilleyJamesHoboltSara B.. 2011. “Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 316–30.
50.
VenturaTiagoLeySandraCantúFrancisco. 2024. “Voting for Law and Order: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies57 (4): 551–83.
51.
Weitz-ShapiroRebeccaWintersMatthew S.. 2017. “Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil.” The Journal of Politics79 (1): 60–74.
52.
WintersMatthew S.Weitz-ShapiroRebecca. 2016. “Who’s in Charge Here? Direct and Indirect Accusations and Voter Punishment of Corruption.” Political Research Quarterly69 (2): 207–19.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
