A growing body of evidence indicates that local police departments are being used to provide revenue for municipalities by imposing and collecting fees, fines, and asset forfeitures. We examine whether revenue collection activities compromise the criminal investigation functions of local police departments. We find that police departments in cities that collect a greater share of their revenue from fees solve violent and property crimes at significantly lower rates. The effect on violent crime clearance is more salient in smaller cities where police officers’ assignments tend not to be highly specialized. We find that this relationship is robust to a variety of empirical strategies, including instrumenting for fines revenue using commuting time. Our results suggest that institutional changes—such as decreasing municipal government reliance on fines and fees for revenue—are important for changing police behavior and improving the provision of public safety.
AlmJamesBuschmanRobertSjoquistDavid. 2011. “Rethinking Local Government Reliance on the Property Tax.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41 (4): 320–31.
BaickerKatherineJacobsonMireille. 2007. “Finders Keepers: Forfeiture Laws, Policing Incentives, and Local Budget.” Journal of Public Economics91:2113–36.
5.
BawnKathleen. 1995. “Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices About Administrative Procedures.” American Political Science Review89 (1): 62–73.
6.
BensonBruceRasmussenDavidSollarsDavid. 1995. “Police Bureaucracies, Their Incentives, and the War on Drugs.” Public Choice83 (1): 21–45.
7.
BrooksLaure Weber. 2015. “Police Discretionary Behavior.” In Critical Issues in Policing: Contemporary Reading, Seventh Edition, edited by DunhamRogerAlpertGeoffrey. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. pp. 122-142.
8.
BrownMichael. 1981. Working the Street: Police Discretion and the Dilemmas of Reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
CareyBenedictGoodeErica. 2016. “Police Try to Lower Racial Bias, but Under Pressure, It Isn’t So Easy.” The New York Times, July11. https://nyti.ms/29JNznU
10.
ChalfinAaronMcCraryJustin. n.d. “The Effect of Police on Crime: New Evidence from US Cities, 1960-2010.” NBER Working Paper18815. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18815.pdf.
11.
ChaneyCarole KennedySaltzsteinGrace Hall. 1998. “Democratic Control and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: The Police and Domestic Violence.” American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 745–68.
12.
DesmondMatthewPapachristosAndrewKirkDavid. 2016. “Police Violence and Citizen Crime Reporting in the Black Community.” American Sociological Review81 (5): 857–76.
EppCharles R.Maynard-MoodyStevenHaider-MarkelDonald P.2014. Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
15.
FalconeDavid N.WellsL. EdwardWeisheitRalph A.2002. “The Small-Town Police Department.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management25 (2): 371–84.
16.
FerreiraFernandoGyourkoJoseph. 2009. “Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U.S. Cities.” Quarterly Journal of Economics124 (1): 399–422.
17.
FrugGerald E.BarronDavid J. 2008. City Bound: How States Stifle Urban Innovation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
18.
FungArchon. 2003. “Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy11 (3): 338–67.
GarrettThomasWagnerGary. 2009. “Red Ink in the Rearview Mirror: Local Fiscal Conditions and the Issuance of Traffic Tickets.” Journal of Law and Economics52 (1): 71–90.
21.
GerberElizabethHopkinsDaniel. 2011. “When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 326–39.
22.
GibsonChris L.FaganAbigail A.AntleKelsey. 2014. “Avoiding Violent Victimization among Youths in Urban Neighborhoods: The Importance of Street Efficacy.” American Journal of Public Health104 (2): e154–61.
23.
GoffmanAlice. 2009. “On the Run: Wanted Men in a Philadelphia Ghetto.” American Sociological Review74 (3): 339–57.
24.
GottschalkMarie. 2008. “Hiding in Plain Sight: American Politics and the Carceral State.” Annual Review of Political Science11 (2): 235–60.
25.
HackworthJason. 2007. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
26.
HarrisAlexes. 2016. A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
HarrisAlexesEvansHeatherBeckettKatherine. 2010. “Drawing Blood from Stones: Legal Debt and Social Inequality in the Contemporary United States.” American Journal of Sociology115 (6): 1753–99.
28.
HolcombJeffersonKovandzicTomislavWilliamsMarian. 2011. “Civil Asset Forfeiture, Equitable Sharing, and Policing for Profit in the United States.” Journal of Criminal Justice39:273–85.
29.
HugginsMartin Knisely. 1998. Political Policing: The United States and Latin America. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.
KaneRobert. 2005. “Compromised Police Legitimacy as a Predictor of Violent Crime in Structurally Disadvantaged Communities.” Criminology43 (2): 469–98.
32.
KantorShawnKitchensCarlPawlowskiSteven. 2017. “Civil Asset Forfeiture, Crime, and Police Incentives: Evidence from the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984.” NBER Working Paper 23873. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23873.
33.
KatzensteinMary FainsodWallerMaureen R. 2015. “Taxing the Poor: Incarceration, Poverty Governance, and the Seizure of Family Resources.” Perspectives on Politics13 (3): 638–56.
34.
KirkDavidPapachristosAndrewFaganJeffreyTylerTom. 2012. “The Paradox of Law Enforcement in Immigrant Communities: Does Tough Immigration Enforcement Undermine Public Safety?”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences641 (1): 79–98.
35.
Kohler-HausmannIssa. 2014. “Managing Justice and Mass Misdemeanors.” Stanford Law Review66 (2): 611–93.
LemosMargaretMinznerMax. 2014. “For-Profit Public Enforcement.” Harvard Law Review127 (3): 853–913.
38.
LeovyJill. 2015. Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America. New York: Penguin Random House.
39.
LermanAmy E.WeaverVesla M.2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
40.
LipskyMichael. 1980. “Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services.” New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
41.
LunaErik. 2003. “Race, Crime, and Institutional Design.” Law and Contemporary Problems66 (3): 183–220.
42.
MaguireEdward R.UchidaCraig D.2000. “Measurement and Explanation in the Comparative Study of American Police Organizations.” Criminal Justice4:491–557.
43.
MakowskyMichaelStratmannThomas. 2009. “Political Economy at Any Speed: What Determines Traffic Citations?.” American Economic Review99 (1): 509–27.
44.
McCubbinsMathew. 1985. “The Legislative Design of Regulatory Procedure.” American Journal of Political Science29 (4): 721–48.
MoeTerry. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization6 (2): 213–53.
47.
MummoloJonathan. 2018. “Modern Police Tactics, Police-Citizen Interactions and the Prospects for Reform.” Journal of Politics80 (1): 1–15.
48.
NatapoffAlexandra. 2015. “Misdemeanor Decriminalization.” Vanderbilt Law Review68 (4): 1055–1116.
49.
NiskanenWilliam A.1971. Bureaucracy & Representative Government. New York: Routledge.
50.
OstromElinorWhitakerGordon. 1973. “Does Local Community Control of Police Make a Difference? Some Preliminary Findings.” American Journal of Political Science17 (1): 48–76.
51.
PetersonPaul. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
52.
RobertsAkiRobertsJohn. 2015. “Crime Clearance and Temporal Variation in Police Investigative Workload: Evidence from National Incidence-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology31:1–24.
53.
SancesMichael W.YouHye Young. 2017. “Who Pays for Government? Descriptive Representation and Exploitative Revenue Sources.” Journal of Politics79 (3): 1090–94.
54.
SharkeyPatrick. 2018. “The Long Reach of Violence: A Broader Perspective on Data, Theory, and Evidence on the Prevalence and Consequences of Exposure to Violence.” Annual Review of Criminology1:85–102.
55.
SharkeyPatrickTorrats-EspinosaGerald. 2017. “The Effect of Violent Crime on Economic Mobility.” Journal of Urban Economics102 (1): 22–33.
56.
SkoganWesley G.2006. “Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters with Police.” Policing & Society16 (2): 99–126.
57.
SossJoeFordingRichardSchramSanford. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
58.
StockJamesWrightJonathanYogoMotohiro. 2002. “Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics20 (4): 518–29.
59.
TieboutCharles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Public Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416–24.
WarrenPatricia Y.2011. “Perceptions of Police Disrespect during Vehicle Stops: A Race-Based Analysis.” Crime & Delinquency57 (3): 356–76.
63.
WeaverVesla M.LermanAmy E. 2010. “Political Consequences of the Carceral State.” American Political Science Review104 (4): 817–33.
64.
WesternBruceKlingJeffrey R.WeimanDavid F.2001. “The Labor Market Consequences of Incarceration.” Crime & Delinquency47 (3): 410–27.
65.
WilliamsGregory. 1984. The Law and Politics of Police Discretion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
66.
WillisJames J.MastrofskiStephen D.WeisburdDavid. 2007. “Making Sense of COMPSTAT: A Theory-Based Analysis of Organizational Change in Three Police Departments.” Law & Society Review41 (1): 147–88.
67.
WilsonJames Q.1968. Varieties of Police Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
68.
WoodB. DanWatermanRichard W.1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review85 (3): 801–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
