In November 2017, New Orleans elected the first woman, and first Black woman, mayor in the city’s history. Voters were unable to rely on gender, race, or partisanship to differentiate between the candidates in the race. How, then, do voters make decisions absent traditional heuristics? Using an analysis of campaign materials and two-wave panel survey, we show that the candidates sent ideological signals with endorsements and issue foci and that voters responded by placing the candidates ideologically. Those voters who could not differentiate between the candidates’ ideologies were less likely to turn out to vote and took longer to decide in the elections. Using a new measure of relative ideological distance adopted for multicandidate races, we show that the distance between each voter and the nearest candidates correlated with vote choice. Our results add to our knowledge of voting behavior and the use of ideology in local elections.
AlvarezR. MichaelHallThad E.LevinInes. 2018. “Low-Information Voting: Evidence from Instant-Runoff Elections.” American Politics Research46 (6):1012–38. doi:10.1177/1532673X18759643.
4.
AnziaSarah F.2013. Timing and Turnout: How Off-cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
5.
ArceneauxKevinKolodnyRobin. 2009. “Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4):755–70. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00399.x.
6.
BadasAlexStaufferKatelyn E.2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies57:245–55. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.10.004.
7.
BarnesTiffany D.TchintianCarolineAllesSantiago. 2017. “Assessing Ballot Structure and Split Ticket Voting: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment.” Journal of Politics79:439–56.
8.
BauerNichole M.2015a. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates.” Political Psychology36 (6):691–708.
9.
BauerNichole M.2015b. “Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (1):94–110.
10.
BauerNichole M.2018. “Untangling the Relationship Between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy39 (1):1–25. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268875.
11.
BauerNichole M.2020. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review56:96–123. doi:10.1177/1078087418770807.
12.
BenjaminAndrea. 2017. “Coethnic Endorsements, Out-group Candidate Preferences, and Perceptions in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review53 (4):631–57. doi:10.1177/1078087416644840.
13.
BenjaminAndreaMillerAlexis. 2019. “Picking Winners: How Political Organizations Influence Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review55 (3):643–74. doi:10.1177/1078087417732647.
BoudreauCherylElmendorfChristopher S.MacKenzieScott A.2015. “Lost in Space? Information Shortcuts, Spatial Voting, and Local Government Representation.” Political Research Quarterly68 (4):843–55. doi:10.1177/1065912915609437.
17.
BurnsPeter F.2006. Electoral Politics Is Not Enough: Racial and Ethnic Minorities and Urban Politics. New York: State Univ. of New York Press.
18.
BurnsPeter F.ThomasMatthew O.2006. “The Failure of the Nonregime.” Urban Affairs Review41 (4):517–27.
19.
BurnsPeter F.ThomasMatthew O.2015. Reforming New Orleans: The Contentious Politics of Change in the Big Easy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
20.
CargileIvy A. M.PringleLisa. 2019. “Context Not Candidate Sex: A Case Study of Female Vote Choice for Mayor.” Urban Affairs Review. Published electronically July 9. doi:10.1177/1078087419861697.
21.
CasseseErin C.BarnesTiffany D.2019. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates.” Political Behavior41:677–700.
22.
CasseseErin C.HolmanMirya R.2018. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior40:785–807. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7.
23.
CasseseErin C.HolmanMirya R.2019. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Race.” Political Psychology40 (1):55–74.
24.
ChambersStefanieNelsonWilliam. 2014. “Black Mayoral Leadership in New Orleans: Minority Incorporation Revisited.” National Political Science Review16:117–93.
25.
ConoverPamela JohnstonFeldmanStanley. 1982. “Projection and the Perception of Candidates’ Issue Positions.” Western Political Quarterly35 (2):228–44. doi:10.1177/106591298203500209.
26.
CrawfordNyron N.2019. “Of Suspicious Minds: Race, Scandal, and the DC Mayoralty.” Journal of Urban Affairs41 (5):679–99. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1514263.
27.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment Without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender9 (4):390–413.
28.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyGadarianShana KushnerTrounstineJessica. 2015. “Electoral Institutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women’s Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (2):318–34.
29.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyGadarianShana KushnerTrounstineJessica. 2020. “Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps.” Urban Affairs Review56:124–53. doi:10.1177/1078087419831074.
30.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2018a. “How Attribution Inhibits Accountability: Evidence from Train Delays.” The Journal of Politics80:1417–22.
31.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2018b. “Off-cycle and Out of Office: Election Timing and the Incumbency Advantage.” The Journal of Politics80:119–32. doi:10.1086/694396.
32.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4):1124–38. doi:10.1086/686308.
33.
DitontoTessa M.HamiltonAllison J.RedlawskDavid P.2013. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior36 (2):335–58. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9232-6.
34.
DittmarKelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
FultonSarah A.OndercinHeather L.2013. “Does Sex Encourage Commitment? The Impact of Candidate Choices on the Time-to-Decision.” Political Behavior35 (4):665–86. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9214-0.
37.
HajnalZoltanTrounstineJessica. 2014. “What Underlies Urban Politics? Race, Class, Ideology, Partisanship, and the Urban Vote.” Urban Affairs Review50 (1):63–99. doi:10.1177/1078087413485216.
HillygusD. SunshineShieldsTodd. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Political Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
40.
HolmanMirya R.2015. Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
41.
HolmanMirya R.2017. “Women in Local Government: What We Know and Where We Go from Here.” State and Local Government Review49 (4):285–96. doi:10.1177/0160323X17732608.
42.
HolmanMirya R.SchneiderMonica C.PondelKristin. 2015. “Gender Targeting in Political Advertisements.” Political Research Quarterly68 (4):816–29.
43.
HopkinsDaniel J.2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
44.
HutchingsVincent L.ValentinoNicholas A.2004. “The Centrality of Race in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science7 (1):383–408. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104859.
45.
KalmoeNathan P.2020. “Uses & Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology.” Political Psychology Published electronically 10 February, 2020. doi: doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650
46.
KamCindy D.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.2013. “Name Recognition and Candidate Support.” American Journal of Political Science57(4): 971–86.
47.
KaufmannKaren M.2004. The Urban Voter: Group Conflict and Mayoral Voting Behavior in American Cities. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
48.
KeeleLuke J.ShahParu R.WhiteIsmailKayKristine. 2017. “Black Candidates and Black Turnout: A Study of Viability in Louisiana Mayoral Elections.” The Journal of Politics79 (3):780–91. doi:10.1086/690302.
49.
KirklandPatricia A.CoppockAlexander. 2018. “Candidate Choice Without Party Labels.” Political Behavior40 (3):571–91. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8.
50.
LairdChryl. 2019. “Black Like Me: How Political Communication Changes Racial Group Identification and Its Implications.” Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (2):324–46. doi:10.1080/21565503.2017.1358187.
51.
LayJ. Celeste. 2009. “Race, Retrospective Voting, and Disasters: The Re-election of C. Ray Nagin After Hurricane Katrina.” Urban Affairs Review44 (5):645–62.
52.
LayJ. Celeste. 2016. “Ignorance Is Bliss: Information Sources and Attitudes About School Choices in New Orleans.” Urban Affairs Review52 (6):973–94.
53.
LemiDanielle Casarez. 2018. “Identity and Coalitions in a Multiracial Era: How State Legislators Navigate Race and Ethnicity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities6 (4):725–42. doi:10.1080/21565503.2017.1288144.
54.
LupiaArthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review88 (1):63–76. doi:10.2307/2944882.
55.
McBrideAllanParkerJoseph B.2008. “‘Chocolate City’ Politics: Race and Empowerment in the First Post-Katrina New Orleans Mayoral Election.” Politics & Policy36 (3):350–74. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2008.00112.x.
56.
McDermottMonika. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science41 (1):270–83.
57.
McDermottMonika. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4):895–918.
58.
McDermottMonika. 2006. “Not for Members Only: Group Endorsements as Electoral Information Cues.” Political Research Quarterly59 (2):249–57.
59.
MendelbergTali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.2007. “Vote Choice in Suburban Elections.” American Political Science Review101:393–408. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070323.
63.
OndercinHeather L.FultonSarah A.2019. “Bargain Shopping: How Candidate Sex Lowers the Cost of Voting.” Politics & Gender. Published electronically June 11. doi:10.1017/S1743923X19000254.
64.
PistonSpencer. 2010. “How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election.” Political Behavior32 (4):431–51.
65.
RahnWendy M.1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing About Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2):472–96.
66.
SancesMichael W.2018. “Ideology and Vote Choice in U.S. Mayoral Elections: Evidence from Facebook Surveys.” Political Behavior40:737–62. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9420-x.
67.
SchaffnerBrian F.StrebMatthewWrightGerald. 2001. “Teams Without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly54 (1):7–30.
68.
SchneiderMonica C.2013. “Gender-Based Strategies on Candidate Websites.” Journal of Political Marketing13 (4):264–90.
69.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2011. “An Exploration of the Content of Stereotypes of Black Politicians.” Political Psychology32 (2):205–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00809.x.
70.
SpenkuchJörg L.ToniattiDavid. 2018. “Political Advertising and Election Results.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics133 (4):1981–2036. doi:10.1093/qje/qjy010.
71.
SumnerJane LawrenceFarrisEmily M.HolmanMirya R.2019. “Crowdsourcing reliable local data.” Political Analysis. Published Electronically 20 September. doi: 10.1017/pan.2019.32.
72.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3):755–69.
73.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2018. “Does the Ideological Proximity Between Candidates and Voters Affect Voting in U.S. House Elections?”Political Behavior40 (1):223–45. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9437-1.
TrounstineJessica. 2009. “All Politics Is Local: The Reemergence of the Study of City Politics.” Perspectives on Politics7 (3):611–18. doi:10.1017/S1537592709990892.
76.
TrounstineJessica. 2011. “Evidence of a Local Incumbency Advantage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (2):255–80.
77.
TrounstineJessica. 2013. “Turnout and Incumbency in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review49 (2):167–89. doi:10.1177/1078087412463536.
VavreckLynn. 2001. “The Reasoning Voter Meets the Strategic Candidate: Signals and Specificity in Campaign Advertising, 1998.” American Politics Research29 (5):507–29. doi:10.1177/1532673X01029005005.
80.
WarshawChristopher. 2019. “Local Elections and Representation in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science22 (1):461–79. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-071108.
81.
WhiteIsmail K.LairdChryl N.AllenTroy D.2014. “Selling Out? The Politics of Navigating Conflicts Between Racial Group Interest and Self-Interest.” American Political Science Review108 (4):783–800. doi:10.1017/S000305541400046X.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
