As men and women are sociologically different, scientific literature attempts to explain differences in public outcomes in terms of the gender of elected representatives. In the municipal sphere, few studies have analyzed the short- and long-run effects of the gender of the mayor and the councillors on global budgetary policy. Our research aims to fill this gap. One of our main findings is that a change from a male to a female mayor, or a change in the proportion of female councillors ideologically alienated from a female mayor, has a significant impact on budgetary policy. We have also verified that the presence of female politicians with a right-wing ideology on a municipal council leads the municipality to lower levels of current expenditure with respect to non-social spending in both the short and the long term.
AlesinaAlbertoPerottiRoberto. 1995. “The Political Economy of Budget Deficits.” Staff Papers42 (1): 1–31.
6.
AllisonPaul D.WilliamsRichardMoral-BenitoEnrique. 2017. “Maximum Likelihood for Cross-Lagged Panel Models with Fixed Effects.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World3:1–17.
7.
AlozieNicholasMcNamaraCatherine. 2010. “Gender Differences in Willingness to Pay for Urban Public Services.” Urban Affairs Review45 (3): 377–90.
8.
AshworthJohnGeysBennyHeyndelsBruno. 2005. “Government Weakness and Local Public Debt Development in Flemish Municipalities.” International Tax and Public Finance12 (4): 395–422.
9.
AvellanedaClaudia N.2009. “Mayoral Quality and Local Public Finance.” Public Administration Review69 (3): 469–86.
10.
BesleyTimothyCoateStephen. 1997. “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics112 (1): 85–114.
11.
BhalotraSoniaClots-FiguerasIrma. 2014. “Health and the Political Agency of Women.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy6 (2): 164–97.
12.
BhargavaAlokSarganJ. Dennis. 1983. “Estimating Dynamic Random Effects Models from Panel Data Covering Short Time Periods.” Econometrica51 (6): 1635–59.
13.
BlundellRichardBondStephen. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics87:115–43.
14.
BonomiGennyBrosioGiorgioDi TommasoMaria L.2013. “The Impact of Gender Quotas on Votes for Women Candidates: Evidence from Italy.” Feminist Economics19 (4): 48–75.
15.
BrattonKathleen A.RayLeonard P.2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 428–37.
16.
BreunigChristianBusemeyerMarius R.2012. “Fiscal Austerity and the Trade-Off Between Public Investment and Social Spending.” Journal of European Public Policy19 (6): 921–38.
17.
BrolloFernandaTroianoUgo. 2016. “What Happens When a Woman Wins an Election? Evidence from Close Races in Brazil.” Journal of Development Economics122:28–45.
18.
BrudneyJeffrey L.HebertF. TedWrightDeil S.2000. “From Organizational Values to Organizational Roles: Examining Representative Bureaucracy in State Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (3): 491–512.
19.
BrunoGiovanni S.2005. “Approximating the Bias of the LSDV Estimator for Dynamic Unbalanced Panel Data Models.” Economics Letters87 (3): 361–66.
20.
BunMaurice J. G.KivietJan F.2001. “The Accuracy of Inference in Small Samples of Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 01-006/4. Accessed July 30, 2019. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/86074/1/01006.pdf.
21.
BunMaurice J. G.KivietJan F.2003. “On the Diminishing Returns of Higher-Order Terms in Asymptotic Expansions of Bias.” Economics Letters79:145–52.
22.
BurnsNancy E.SchumakerPaul. 1987. “Gender Differences in Attitudes About the Role of Local Government.” Social Science Quarterly68 (1): 138–48.
23.
CabaleiroRobertoBuchEnrique. 2015. “Public Spending Policies and Budgetary Balances: Evidence from Spanish Municipalities.” Lex Localis—Journal of Local Self-Government13 (4): 973–94.
24.
CabaleiroRobertoBuchEnrique. 2018. “Adjustments in Municipal Fiscal Crises. Are They Different According to the Gender of the Mayor?” Local Government Studies44 (2): 255–74.
25.
CarrollSusan J.2001. “Representing Women: Women State Legislators as Agents of Policy-Related Change.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, edited by CarrollSusan J., 3–21. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
ChattopadhyayRaghabendraDufloEsther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica72 (5): 1409–43.
28.
Clots-FiguerasIrma. 2011. “Women in Politics: Evidence from the Indian States.” Journal of Public Economics95 (7–8): 664–90.
29.
CoaseRonald H.1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics3 (1): 1–44.
30.
ConcialdiPierre. 1999. “Demography, Employment and the Future of Social Protection Financing.” In Financing Social Protection in Europe, edited by Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 91–116. Helsinki: Publications 21.
31.
CrosonRachelGneezyUri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature47 (2): 448–74.
32.
DelgadoFrancisco J.Lago-PeñasSantiagoMayorMatías. 2015. “On the Determinants of Local Tax Rates: New Evidence from Spain.” Contemporary Economic Policy33 (2): 351–68.
33.
DisneyRichard. 2007. “Population Ageing and the Size of the Welfare State: Is There a Puzzle to Explain?” European Journal of Political Economy23 (2): 542–53.
34.
DoviSuzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?”The American Political Science Review96 (4): 729–43.
35.
DownsAnthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” The Journal of Political Economy65 (2): 135–50.
36.
DuboisEricLeprinceMatthieuPatySonia. 2007. “The Effects of Politics on Local Tax Setting: Evidence from France.” Urban Studies44 (8): 1603–18.
37.
EdlundLenaPandeRohini. 2001. “Why Have Women Become Left-Wing? The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in Marriage.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics117 (3): 917–61.
38.
FallanLars. 1999. “Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation; an Experimental Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics18 (2): 173–84.
39.
FarrellCatherineTitcombeSarah. 2016. “Gender and the Experiences of Local Elected Members—A Focus on Wales.” Local Government Studies42 (6): 867–84.
40.
FerreiraFernandoGyourkoJoseph. 2014. “Does Gender Matter for Political Leadership? The Case of U.S. Mayors.” Journal of Public Economics112:24–39.
41.
FoxRichard L.SchuhmannRobert A.1999. “Gender and Local Government: A Comparison of Women and Men City Managers.” Public Administration Review59 (3): 231–42.
42.
FreierRonnyOdendahlChristian. 2012. “Do Absolute Majorities Spend Less? Evidence from Germany.” DIW Berlin Discussion Paper 1239. Accessed July 30, 2019. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2141748.
43.
FreierRonnyThomasiusSebastian. 2016. “Voters Prefer More Qualified Mayors, but Does It Matter for Public Finances? Evidence for Germany.” International Tax and Public Finance23 (5): 875–910.
44.
FunkPatriciaGathmannChristina. 2015. “Gender Gaps in Policy Making: Evidence from Direct Democracy in Switzerland.” Economic Policy30 (81): 141–81.
45.
GagliarducciStefanoPasermanM. Daniele. 2012. “Gender Interactions Within Hierarchies: Evidence from the Political Arena.” The Review of Economic Studies79 (3): 1021–52.
46.
GammageSarahKabeerNailaYana van der Meulen Rodgers. 2016. “Voice and Agency: Where Are We Now?”Feminist Economics22 (1): 1–29.
47.
GarmannSebastian. 2014. “The Causal Effect of Coalition Governments on Fiscal Policies: Evidence from a Regression Kink Design.” Applied Economics46 (36): 4490–4507.
48.
GilliganCarol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
49.
GuillamónMaria D.BastidaFranciscoBenitoBernardino. 2013. “The Electoral Budget Cycle on Municipal Police Expenditure.” European Journal of Law and Economics36 (3): 447–69.
50.
HamidullahMadinah F.RiccucciNorma M.PandeySanjay K.2015. “Women in City Hall: Gender Dimensions of Managerial Values.” The American Review of Public Administration45 (3): 247–62.
51.
HayakawaKazuhikoPesaranM. Hashem. 2015. “Robust Standard Errors in Transformed Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models With Cross-Sectional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics188 (1): 111–34.
52.
HeidbrederBrianneGrasseNathanIhrkeDouglasCherryBrian D.2011. “Determinants of Policy Conflict in Michigan Municipalities.” State and Local Government Review43 (1): 32–45.
53.
Hernández-NicolásCarmen MaríaMartín-UgedoJuan FranciscoMínguez-VeraAntonio. 2018. “Women Mayors and Management of Spanish Councils: An Empirical Analysis.” Feminist Economics24 (1): 168–91.
54.
HerwartzHelmutTheilenBernd. 2017. “Ideology and Redistribution Through Public Spending.” European Journal of Political Economy46:74–90.
55.
HibbsDouglas A.1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review71 (4): 1467–87.
56.
HolmanMirya R.2014a. “Sex and the City: Female Leaders and Spending on Social Welfare Programs in U.S. Municipalities.” Journal of Urban Affairs36 (4): 701–15.
57.
HolmanMirya R.2014b. Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
58.
HolmanMirya R.2016. “Gender, Political Rhetoric, and Moral Metaphors in State of the City Addresses.” Urban Affairs Review52 (4): 501–30.
59.
HolmanMirya R.2017. “Women in Local Government: What We Know and Where We Go from Here.” State and Local Government Review49 (4): 285–96.
60.
HsiaoChengPesaranM. HashemTahmisciogluA. Kamil. 2002. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Fixed Effects Dynamic Panel Data Models Covering Short Time Periods.” Journal of Econometrics109 (1): 107–50.
JacobsonWillow S.PalusChristine KelleherBowlingCynthia J.2009. “A Woman’s Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20 (2): 477–504.
63.
KathleneLyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 560–76.
64.
KellyNathan J.2005. “Political Choice, Public Policy, and Distributional Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 865–80.
65.
KivietJan F.1995. “On Bias, Inconsistency, and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics68 (1): 53–78.
66.
KripfganzSebastian. 2016. “Quasi–Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Linear Dynamic Short-T Panel-Data Models.” Stata Journal16 (4): 1013–38.
67.
Le MauxBenoîtRocaboyYvonGoodspeedTimothy. 2011. “Political Fragmentation, Party Ideology and Public Expenditures.” Public Choice147 (1–2): 43–67.
68.
LlorenAnoukRossetJan. 2017. “Gendered policy preferences? Candidates’ views on political issues in a comparative perspective.” Comparative European Politics15 (6): 944–68.
69.
LottJohn R.KennyLawrence W.1999. “Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?.” Journal of Political Economy107 (6): 1163–98.
70.
MayrKarin. 2007. “Immigration and Income Redistribution: A Political Economy Analysis.” Public Choice131 (1–2): 101–16.
71.
MullardMaurice. 2006. “Does Politics Make a Difference? Thatcher, Blair and the Politics of Public Expenditure.” Public Management Review8 (3): 463–82.
72.
OpstrupNielsVilladsenAnders R.2015. “The right mix? Gender diversity in top management teams and financial performance.” Public Administration Review75 (2): 291–301.
73.
OsborneMartin J.SlivinskiAl. 1996. “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics111 (1): 65–96.
74.
PadavicIreneReskinBarbara. 2002. Women and Men at Work. London: SAGE.
75.
PandayPranab K.2017. Reforming urban governance in Bangladesh: The city corporation. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
ParkSanghee. 2014. “The Politics of Redistribution in Local Governments: The Effect of Gender Representation on Welfare Spending in California Counties.” Journal of Public Policy34 (2): 269–301.
77.
PhillipsAnne. 1998. “Democracy and Representation: Or, why should it matter who our representatives are?” In Feminism and Politics, edited by AnnePhillips, 224–40. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
ReingoldBeth. 2008. “Women as Officeholders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, edited by ChristinaWolbrechtBeckwithKarenBaldezLisa, 128–47. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
83.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society18 (4): 510–31.
84.
RogoffKenneth S.1990. “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles.” American Economic Review80 (1): 21–36.
85.
RoodmanDavid. 2009. “How To Do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” The Stata Journal9 (1): 86–136.
86.
RoubiniNourielSachsJeffrey D.1989. “Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies.” European Economic Review33 (5): 903–38.
87.
SacchiAgneseSalottiSimone. 2016. “A Comprehensive Analysis of Expenditure Decentralization and of the Composition of Local Public Spending.” Regional Studies50 (1): 93–109.
88.
SanbonmatsuKiraDolanKathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 485–94.
89.
SheltonCameron A.2007. “The Size and Composition of Government Expenditure.” Journal of Public Economics91 (11–12): 2230–60.
90.
ShiMinSvenssonJakob. 2006. “Political Budget Cycles: Do They Differ Across Countries and Why?”Journal of Public Economics90 (8): 1367–89.
91.
SmithAdrienne R.ReingoldBethOwensMichael Leo. 2012. “The Political Determinants of Women’s Descriptive Representation in Cities.” Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 315–29.
92.
SundströmAkselWängnerudLena. 2018. “Women’s Empowerment at the Local Level.” In Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe. Strategies, Challenges and Future Research, edited by AlexanderAmy C.BolzendahlCatherineJalalzaiFarida, 117–37. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
93.
SuzukiKoheiAvellanedaClaudia N.2018. “Women and Risk-Taking Behaviour in Local Public Finance.” Public Management Review20 (12): 1741–67.
94.
SvalerydHelena. 2009. “Women’s Representation and Public Spending.” European Journal of Political Economy25 (2): 186–98.
95.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
96.
ThomasSue. 1994. How Women Legislate. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
97.
TillyLouise A.PatriciaGurin. 1992. Women, Politics and Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
98.
TufteEdward R.1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
99.
WeikartLynne A.ChenGregWilliamsDaniel W.HromicHaris. 2007. “The Democratic Sex: Gender Differences and the Exercise of Power.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy28 (1): 119–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
