What is the causal relationship between population size and the contracting out of public service delivery in local governments? The size of the population of a given municipality has long been thought to be an important driver of contracting out public service delivery, which theoretically streamlines public service production and saves taxpayers’ money. This article makes use of the 2007 Danish local government structural reform—when 239 municipalities were merged into 66 new entities while 29 municipalities remained untouched—as a quasi-experiment to explore the population size/contracting out relationship. Results show that the relationship differs across policy sectors: It is negative for services with high fixed costs, presumably due to scale economies, and is positive for services that are difficult to measure, probably due to more administrative and technical capacity in larger municipalities. Also, the effect of population size is positive for tasks in free-choice markets, presumably because private contractors find large free-choice markets more attractive.
AndrewsRhys. 2013. “Local Government Size and Efficiency in Labor-Intensive Public Services: Evidence from Local Educational Authorities in England.” In The Challenge of Local Government Size, edited by Lago-PenasSantiagoMartinez-VazguezJorge, 171–88. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
2.
BelGerma. 2013. “Local Government Size and Efficiency in Capital-Intensive Services: What Evidence Is There of Economies of Scale, Density and Scope?” In The Challenge of Local Government Size, edited by Lago-PenasSantiagoMartinez-VazguezJorge, 148–70. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3.
BelGermaBrownTrevorWarnerMildred E.2014. “Editorial Overview: Symposium on Mixed and Hybrid Models of Public Service Delivery.” International Public Management Journal17 (3): 297–307.
4.
BelGermaFagedaXavier. 2007. “Why Do Local Governments Privatise Public Services?” Local Government Studies33 (4): 517–34.
5.
BelGermaFagedaXavier. 2008. “Local Privatization, Intermunicipal Cooperation, Transaction Costs and Political Interests: Evidence from Spain.” Research Institute of Applied Economics, Working Papers, No. 4. http://www.ub.edu/irea/working_papers/2008/200804.pdf
6.
BelGermaFagedaXavier. 2009. “Factors Explaining Local Privatization: A Meta-regression Analysis.” Public Choice139:105–19.
7.
BelGermaMirallesAntonio. 2003. “Factors Influencing the Privatisation of Urban Solid Waste Collection in Spain.” Urban Studies40 (7): 1323–34.
8.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 2000. “Unnatural Experiments? Estimating the Incidence of Endogenous Policies.” The Economic Journal110:672–94.
9.
BhattiYosefHansenKasper Møller. 2011. “Who ‘Marries’ Whom? The Influence of Societal Connectedness, Economic and Political Homogeneity, and Population Size on Jurisdictional Consolidations.” European Journal of Political Research50 (2): 212–38.
10.
BhattiYosefOlsenAsmus LethPedersenLene Holm. 2009. “The Effects of Administrative Professionals on Contracting Out.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions22 (1): 121–37.
11.
Blom-HansenJens. 2003. “Is Private Delivery of Public Services Really Cheaper? Evidence from Public Road Maintenance in Denmark.” Public Choice115:419–38.
12.
Blom-HansenJensHoulbergKurtSerritzlewSøren. 2014. “Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 790–807.
13.
BlomquistPaula. 2004. “The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s.” Social Policy & Administration38 (2): 139–55.
14.
BöhlmarkAndersLindahlMikael. 2007. The Impact of School Choice on Pupil Achievement, Segregation and Costs: Swedish Evidence. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
15.
BoyneGeorge. 1998. “The Determinants of Variations in Local Service Contracting: Garbage In, Garbage Out?” Urban Affairs Review34 (1): 150–63.
16.
BrownTrevorPotoskiMatthew. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13 (4): 441–68.
17.
BrownTrevorPotoskiMatthew. 2005. “Transactions Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective.” Public Performance & Management Review28 (3): 326–51.
18.
BrownTrevorPotoskiMatthewSlykeDavid M. Van. 2008. “Changing Modes of Service Delivery: How Past Choices Structure Future Choices.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26:127–43.
19.
BrownTrevorPotoskiMatthewSlykeDavid M. Van. 2010. “Contracting for Complex Products.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20 (Suppl. 1): i41–58.
20.
CarrJered B.LeRouxKellyShresthaManoj. 2009. “Institutional Ties, Transaction Costs, and External Service Production.” Urban Affairs Review44 (3): 403–27.
21.
ChristensenLasse RingHoulbergKurtPetersenOle Helby. 2012. “Udlicitering eller egenproduktion – Hvordan forklarer den politologiske litteratur forskelle i kommunernes brug af private leverandører i opgaveløsningen?” [Contracting Out or Own Production—How Does the Political Science Literature Explain Differences in the Municipalities’ Use of Private Suppliers?] Tidsskriftet Politik15 (2): 44–55.
22.
DombergerSimonJensenPaul. 1997. “Contracting Out by the Public Sector: Theory, Evidence, Prospects.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy13 (4): 67–78.
23.
ElinderMikaelJordahlHenrik. 2013. “Political Preferences and Public Sector Outsourcing.” European Journal of Political Economy30:43–57.
24.
FogedSøren Kjær. 2015. “Årsager til konkurrenceudsættelse i danske kommuner, 2007–2013: Fra generelle til sektorafhængige forklaringer” [The Reasons for Contracting Out in Danish Municipalities, 2007–2013: From Generic to Sector-Dependent Explanations]. Politica47 (1): 24–45.
25.
GirthAmanda M.HefetzAmirJohnstonJocelyn M.WarnerMildred E.2012. “Outsourcing Public Service Delivery: Management Responses in Noncompetitive Markets.” Public Administration Review72 (6): 887–900.
26.
González-GómezFranciscoGuardiolaJorge. 2009. “A Duration Model for the Estimation of the Contracting Out of Urban Water Management in Southern Spain.” Urban Affairs Review44 (6): 886–906.
27.
GuardiolaJorgeGonzález-GómezFranciscoRubioMiguel A. Garcia. 2010. “Is Time Really Important for Research into Contracting Out Public Services in Cities? Evidence for Urban Water Management in Southern Spain.” Cities27 (5): 369–76.
28.
HebdonRobertJalettePatrice. 2008. “The Restructuring of Municipal Services: A Canada–United States Comparison.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26:144–58.
29.
HefetzAmirWarnerMildred E.2012. “Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance of Service, Market, and Management Characteristics.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22:289–317.
30.
HodgeGraeme. 1998. “Contracting Public Sector Services: A Meta-analytic Perspective of the International Evidence.” Australian Journal of Public Administration57 (4): 98–110.
31.
HoulbergKurt. 1995. “Kommunale stordriftsfordele – myte eller realitet?” [Municipal Scale Economies—Myth or Reality?]Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift76 (1): 65–88.
32.
HoulbergKurt. 2012. Udvikling i konkurrenceudsættelse i kommuner og regioner i forbindelse med kommunalreformen [The Development in Contracting Out in Municipalities and Regions Related to the Municipal Reform]. København, Denmark: KORA.
33.
HoulbergKurt. 2014. “David og Goliat i kassen før lukketid. Danske kommuners gælds- og likviditetsudvikling op til kommunesammenlægningerne i 2007” [David and Goliath with the Fingers in the Till Before Closing Time. Debt and Liquidity Management in Danish Municipalities Facing Amalgamation]. Politica46 (2): 237–64.
34.
HoulbergKurtDahlPoul S.2010. “Konkurrenceudsættelse i danske kommuner – Kommunalreformen som fødselshjælper?” [Contracting Out in Danish Municipalities—Municipal Reform as a Midwife?] Politica42 (2): 163–82.
35.
JalettePatriceHebdonRobert. 2012. “Unions and Privatization: Opening the ‘Black Box.’”Industrial & Labor Relations Review65 (1): 17–35.
36.
Krevi. 2011. Frit valg i ældreplejen [Free Choice in the Elderly Care Sector]. Århus, Denmark: Krevi.
37.
LassenDavid DreyerSerritzlewSøren. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review105 (2): 238–58.
38.
LevinJonathanTadelisSteven. 2010. “Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Cities.” The Journal of Industrial Economics58 (3): 507–41.
39.
MeyerBruce. 1995. “Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics13 (2): 151–61.
40.
MirallesAntonio. 2009. “A Duration Model Analysis of Privatization of Municipal Water Services.” Revista de Economía Aplicada50 (17): 47–75.
41.
NiAnna YaBretschneiderStuart. 2007. “The Decision to Contract Out: A Study of Contracting for E-government Services in State Governments.” Public Administration Review67 (3): 531–44.
42.
OstromElinor. 1983. “A Public Choice Approach to Metropolitan Institutions: Structures, Incentives and Performance.” Social Science Quarterly20:79–96.
43.
O’TooleLaurence J.MeierKenneth J.2004. “Parkinson’s Law and the New Public Management? Contracting Determinants and Service-Quality Consequences in Public Education.” Public Administration Review64 (3): 342–51.
44.
PallesenThomas. 2004. “A Political Perspective on Contracting Out: The Politics of Good Times. Experiences from Danish Local Governments.” Governance17 (4): 573–87.
45.
RostgaardTine. 2006. “Constructing the Care Consumer: Free Choice of Home Care for the Elderly in Denmark.” European Societies8 (3): 443–63.
46.
SandströmMikaelBergströmFredrik. 2005. “School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Will Not Hurt You.” Journal of Public Economics89 (2–3): 351–80.
47.
SavasEmanuel. 1987. Privatization: The Key to Better Government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
48.
ShresthaManojFeiockRichard C.2011. “Transaction Cost, Exchange Embeddedness, and Interlocal Cooperation in Local Public Goods Supply.” Political Research Quarterly64 (3): 573–87.
49.
StieglerGeorge. 1958. “The Economies of Scale.” The Journal of Law & Economics1:54–71.
50.
SundellAndersLapuenteVictor. 2012. “Adam Smith or Machiavelli? Political Incentives for Contracting Out Local Public Services.” Public Choice153 (3–4): 469–85.
51.
VrangbækKarstenPetersenOle HelbyHjelmarUlf. 2013. “Is Contracting Out Good or Bad for Employees? A Review of International Experience.” Review of Public Personnel Administration35 (1): 3–23.
52.
WarnerMildred E.2013. “Does Local Government Size Matter? Privatization and Hybrid Systems of Local Service Delivery.” In The Challenge of Local Government Size, edited by Lago-PenasSantiagoMartinez-VazguezJorge, 263–88. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
53.
WarnerMildred E.HebdonRobert. 2001. “Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management20 (2): 315–36.
