Gated communities have been thought to contribute to urban inequality, but empirical evidence is limited. This study utilizes the American Housing Survey for 2001 to examine the differential access of Latinos and Whites to gated communities in metropolitan United States. The results show that education is the most important sorting mechanism: as education increases, so does the probability to gate. On one hand, education trumps the effects of social class for owners, leading to segmentation within each class category, regardless of race/ethnicity; on the other hand, Latinos with higher education tend to select gated residences more often than comparable Whites.
AlbaR. D.LoganJ. R.1991. Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography28: 431-53.
2.
AlbaR. D.LoganJ. R.1992. Assimilation and stratification in the homeownership patterns of racial and ethnic groups. International Migration Review26(4): 1314-41.
3.
AlbaR. D.LoganJ. R.StultsB. J.2000. The changing neighborhood contexts of the immigrant metropolis. Social Forces79(2): 587-621.
4.
AlbaR. D.LoganJ. R.StultsB. J.MarzanG.ZhangW.1999. Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review64: 446-60.
5.
ApgarW.CalderA.2005. The dual mortgage market: The persistence of discrimination in mortgage lending. In The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America, ed. de Souza BriggsXavier. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6.
BeenV.EllenI.MadarJ.2009. The high cost of segregation: Exploring racial disparities in high cost lending. Working paper. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, www.furmancenter.nyu.edu.
7.
BetancurJ. J.1996. The settlement experience of Latinos in Chicago: Segregation, speculation, and the ecology model. Social Forces74(4): 1299-1324.
8.
BlakelyE. J.SnyderM. G.1997. Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9.
BowdlerJ.2005. Jeopardizing Hispanic homeownership: Predatory practices in the homebuying market. National Council of La Raza. Issue Brief, no. 15.
10.
BriggsX.de Souza. 2005. The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11.
ByersM.2003. Waiting at the gate. In Suburban sprawl: Culture, theory, and politics, ed. LindstromJ.BartlingH., 245-56. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
12.
CaldeiraT. P. R.1996. Fortified enclaves: The new urban segregation. Public Culture8(2): 303-23.
13.
CaldeiraT. P. R.2000. City of walls: Crime, segregation and citizenship in Sao Paolo. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
14.
CharlesC. Z.2000. Neighborhood racial-composition preferences: Evidence from a multiethnic Metropolis. Social Problems47(3): 379-407.
15.
CharlesC. Z.2003. The Dynamics of Residential Segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29167-207.
16.
CharlesC. Z.2005. Can we live together? Racial preferences and neighborhood outcomes. In The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America, edited by de Souza BriggsX., 45-81. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
17.
ChenH.1992. Chinatown no more: Taiwan immigrants in contemporary New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
18.
ClarkW. A. V.1992. Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context. Demography29: 451-65.
19.
ConnellJ.1999. Beyond Manila: Walls, malls, and private spaces. Environment and Planning A31: 417-39.
20.
DanicoM. Y.2004. The formation of post-suburban communities: Little Saigon and Koreatown, Orange County. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy24: 15-45.
21.
DávilaA. M.2001. Latinos, Inc.: the marketing and making of a people. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
22.
DavisM.1990. City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.
23.
EbaughH. R.CurryM.2000. Fictive kin as social capital in new immigrant communities. Sociological Perspectives43: 189-209.
24.
EllenI. G.2000. Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
25.
FreidenbergJ.2000. Growing old in El Barrio. New York: New York Univ. Press.
26.
FunkhouserE.RamosF. A.1993. The choice of migration destination: Dominican and Cuban Americans to the Mainland United States and Puerto Rico. International Migration Review27: 537-56.
27.
GerardiK.WillenP.2009. Subprime mortgages, foreclosures, and urban neighborhoods. BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy9(3): article 12 (Symposium). http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/vol9/iss3/art12.
28.
GilbertsonG. A.GurakD. T.1993. Broadening the enclave debate: The labor market experiences of Dominican and Colombian men in New York City. Sociological Forum8: 205-20.
29.
GlaszeG.2005. Some reflections on the economic and political organisation of private neighbourhoods. Housing Studies20(2): 221-33.
30.
GlaszeG.WebsterC.Frantz, eds. 2006. Private cities: Global and local perspectives. New York: Routledge.
31.
GordonT. M.2004. Moving up by moving out? Planned developments and residential segregation in California. Urban Studies41(2): 441-61.
32.
HoffmanS. D.DuncanG. J.1988. What are the economic consequences of divorce?Demography25(4): 641-45.
33.
JaccardJ.2001. Interaction effects in logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
KandelW.CromartieJ.2001. New patterns of Hispanic settlement in rural America. United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Research Report 99. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
KennedyD. J.1995. Residential associations as state actors: Regulating the impact of gated communities on nonmembers. The Yale Law Journal105(3): 761-93.
36.
KramerJ. R.1970. The American minority community. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Le GoixR.2005. Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in southern California. Housing Studies20 (2): 323-44.
39.
Le GoixR.WebsterC. J.2006. Gated communities, sustainable cities, and a tragedy of urban commons. Critical Planning13(Summer).
40.
LoganJ. R.AlbaR. D.1993. Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography30: 243-68.
41.
LoganJ. R.AlbaR. D.LeungS.1996. Minority access to White suburbs: A multiregional comparison. Social Forces74: 851-81.
42.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH. L.1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley CA: Univ. of California Press.
43.
LoganJ. R.SchneiderM.1982. Governmental organization and changing city-suburban income inequality. Urban Affairs Quarterly17(3): 303-18.
44.
LoganJ. R.StultsB.FarleyR.2004. Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: Two decades of change. Demography41(1): 1-22.
45.
LoganJ. R.ZhangW.AlbaR. D.2002. Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review67(2): 299-322.
46.
LowS.2003a. Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.
47.
LowS.2003b. Imprisoned by the walls built to keep “the others” out. Los Angeles Times, 19December2003.
48.
LuymesDonald. 1997. The fortification of suburbia: Investigating the rise of enclave communities. Landscape and Urban Planning39: 187-203.
49.
MarcuseP.1997. The ghetto of exclusion and the fortified enclave: New patterns in the U. S. American Behavioral Scientist41: 311-26.
50.
MasseyD.DentonN. A.1987. Trends in the residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970-1980. American Sociological Review52(6): 802-25.
51.
MasseyD.DentonN. A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
52.
MasseyD.MullanB. P.1984. Processes of Hispanic and Black spatial assimilation. American Journal of Sociology89: 836-73.
53.
MasseyD. S.2005. Racial discrimination in housing: A moving target. Social Problems52(2):148–51.
54.
McKenzieE.1994. Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
55.
McKenzieE.2003. Common-interest housing in the communities of tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate14(1/2): 203-134.
56.
McKenzieE.2005. Constructing the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A case study of emerging trends in American gated communities. Housing Studies20(2):187-203.
57.
NeeV.SandersJ. M.SernauS.1994. Job transitions in an immigrant metropolis: Ethnic boundaries and the mixed economy. American Sociological Review59: 849-72.
58.
NelsonR.2005. Private neighborhoods and the transformation of local government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
59.
OliverM. L.ShapiroT. M.1995. Black wealth/White wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.
60.
PortesA.JensenL.1989. The enclave and the entrants: Patterns of ethnic enterprise in Miami before and after Mariel. American Sociological Review54: 929-49.
61.
PortesA.StepickA.1993. City on the edge: The transformation of Miami. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
62.
RamosJ.2004. The Latino wave: How Hispanics will elect the next American President. New York: Rayo.
63.
RughJ.MasseyD.2010. Racial segregation and the American foreclosure crisis. American Sociological Review75(5): 629-52.
64.
SanchezT. W.LangR.DhavaleD. M.2005. Security versus status? A first look at the Census’s gated community data. Journal of Planning Education and Research24: 281-91.
Spatial Structures for Social Sciences. 2002. Separate and UNEQUAL: The neighborhood gap for Blacks and Hispanics in metropolitan America. Report, Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research, Univ. at Albany.
67.
SquiresG.KubrinC. E.2006. Privileged Places: Race, Residence, and the Structure of Opportunity. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
