This paper investigates the social dimensions of gated communities (GCs) in US western metropolitan areas and how they contribute to segregation. We use geographically referenced data of GCs, and introduce a local metric based on social distance indices (SDI). This multivariate spatial analysis investigates homogeneity in three aspects: race and ethnicity, economic class and age between 2000 and 2010 census. The results indicate contrasting effects given different levels of geography. GCs significantly contribute to segregation patterns at a local level, and this has been locally reinforcing. Although socioeconomic segregation and ethnic status yield the most prevalent structure of local distance, gated enclaves are also significantly structured by age. The findings are considered in the context of a metropolitan decline in levels of segregation. Data also show that GCs are likely to be located within large racially homogeneous areas, and do not significantly contribute to racial segregation.
ApparicioP (2000) Indices of residential segregation: An integrated tool in geographical information system. Cybergeo134: DOI : 10.4000/cybergeo.12063.
2.
BagaeenSUdukuO (eds) (2010) Gated Communities: Social Sustainability in Contemporary and Historical Gated Developments. London: Earthscan.
BlakelyEJSnyderMG (1997) Fortress America, Gated Communities In The United States. Washington, DC, Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press & Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
6.
BrowerT (1992) Communities within the community: Consent, constitutionalism, and other failures of legal theory in residential associations. Land Use and Environmental Law Journal7(2): 203–273.
7.
ClarkWAMalmbergBOsthJ (2012) Where Does the Mixed Race Population Live: Evidence from Los Angeles? In: American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting – AAGs 2012. New York, 24–28 February 2012.
8.
DawkinsCJ (2004) Measuring the spatial pattern of residential segregation. Urban Studies4: 833–851.
9.
Fox-GothamK (2000) Urban space, restrictive covenants and the origins of racial segregation in a US city, 1900–50. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(3): 616–633.
10.
GlaeserEVigdorJ (2012) The end of the segregated century: Racial separation in America’s neighborhoods, 1890–2010. In: Civic Report. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, 26 pp. Available at: http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_66.htm (accessed June 2012).
11.
GordonTM (2004) Moving up by moving out? Planned developments and residential segregation in California. Urban Studies41(2): 441–461.
12.
GraslandC (2009) Spatial analysis of social facts. A tentative theoretical framework derived from Tobler’s first law of geography and Blau’s multilevel structural theory of society. In: BavaudFMagerC (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Geography. Lausanne: University of Lausanne, p. 46.
13.
KatoY (2006) Planning and social diversity: Residential segregation in American New towns. Urban Studies43(12): 2285–2299.
14.
KennedyDJ (1995) Residential associations as state actors: Regulating the impact of gated communities on nonmembers. Yale Law Journal105(3): 761–793.
15.
KirbyAHarlanSLLarsenL. (2006) Examining the significance of housing enclaves in the metropolitan United States of America. Housing, Theory & Society23(1): 19–33.
16.
Lacour-LittleMMalpezziS (2001) Gated Communities and Property Values. Madison, WI: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Department of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics – University of Wisconsin, p. 36.
17.
Le GoixR (2005) Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in southern California. Housing Studies20(2): 323–343.
18.
Le GoixRVesselinovE (2013) Gated communities and house prices: Suburban change in southern California, 1980–2008. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(6): 2129–2151.
19.
Le GoixRWebsterCJ (2008) Gated communities. Geography Compass2(4): 1189–1214.
20.
LowS (2003) Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.
21.
LowS (2012) A multi-disciplinary framework for the study of private housing schemes: Integrating anthropological, psychological and political levels of theory and analysis. GeoJournal77(2): 185–201.
22.
McKenzieE (1994) Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT, London: Yale University Press.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces67(2): 281–315.
25.
ModarresA (2004) Neighborhood integration: Temporality and social fracture. Journal of Urban Affairs26(3): 351–377.
26.
NelsonACDawkinsCJSanchezTW (2004) Urban containment and residential segregation: A preliminary investigation. Urban Studies41(2): 423–439.
27.
NewmanO (1972) Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: MacMillan.
28.
OwensJB (1997) Westec story: Gated communities and the Fourth Amendment. American Criminal Law Review34(3): 1127–1160.
29.
ReibelMBufalinoME (2005) Street-weighted interpolation techniques for demographic count estimation in incompatible zone systems. Environment and Planning A37(1): 127–139.
30.
ReibelMRegelsonM (2011) Neighborhood racial and ethnic change: The time dimension in segregation. Urban Geography32(3): 360–382.
31.
SanchezTLangRE (2005) Security vs. status? A first look at the census’ gated community data. Journal of Planning Education and Research24(3): 281–291.
32.
SassenS (2013) When the center no longer holds: Cities as frontier zones. Cities34: 67–70.
33.
WebsterC (2007) Property rights, public space and urban design. Town Planning Review78(1): 81–101.
34.
WebsterCJ (2002) Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts, and gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29(3): 397–412.
35.
WhiteMJ (1983) The measurement of spatial segregation. American Journal of Sociology88(5): 1008–1018.
