The environmental gentrification hypothesis predicts that environmental quality improvements in poor communities may spur gentrification and the displacement of residents. The author analyzes the relationship between hazardous site cleanups and gentrification in Portland, Oregon, during the 1990s. Using resident-defined neighborhoods as the unit of analysis, the author finds that there is no relationship between the extent of gentrification a neighborhood experiences and the perceived or actual environmental improvement that precedes it. Based on this evidence, the author suggests that similar types of cities may be able to improve environmental conditions relatively equitably without exacerbating concerns related to gentrification and social justice.
Anselin, L.1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. New York: Springer.
2.
Atkinson, R.2000. Measuring gentrification and displacement in greater London . Urban Studies37 (1): 149-65.
3.
Banzhaf, H., and E. McCormick.2007. Moving beyond cleanup: Identifying the crucibles of environmental gentrification. Working Paper 07-29, Andrew YoungSchool of Policy Studies.
4.
Banzhaf, H., and R. Walsh.2008. Do people vote with their feet? An empirical test of Tiebout’s mechanism. American Economic Review98 (3): 843-63.
5.
Been, V., and F. Gupta.1997. Coming to the nuisance or going to the barrios? A longitudinal analysis of environmental justice claims. Ecology Law Quarterly24 (1): 1-56.
6.
Bonorris, S.2004. Environmental justice for all: A fifty-state survey of legislation, policies, and initiatives. Joint report, Hastings College of Law and American Bar Association.
7.
Brueckner, J., and S. Rosenthal.2009. Gentrification and neighborhood housing cycles: Will America’s future downtowns be rich?Review of Economics and Statistics91 (4): 725-43.
8.
Cameron, T., and G. Crawford.2003. Superfund taint and neighborhood change: Ethnicity, age distributions and household structure. Working Paper 2003-38, Univ. of OregonEconomics Department.
9.
Campbell, H., Peck, L., and Tschudi, M.2010. Justice for all? A casual analysis of Toxics Release Inventory facility location. Review of Policy27 (1): 1-25.
10.
Campbell, S.1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (3): 296-312.
11.
Dale, L., J. Murdoch, M. Thayer, and P. Waddell1999. Do property values rebound from environmental stigmas ? Land Economics75:311-26.
12.
Danyluk, M., and D. Ley.2007. Modalities of the new middle class: Ideology and behaviour in the journey to work from gentrified neighbourhoods in Canada. Urban Studies44 (11): 2195-2210.
13.
Ferguson, R., and W. Dickens.2000. Urban problems and community development . Social Science Journal37 (2): 317-20.
14.
Freeman, L.2005. Displacement or succession? Residential mobility in gentrifying neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review40 (4): 463-91.
15.
Garrod, G., and K. Willis.1992. Valuing goods’ characteristics: An application of the hedonic price method to environmental attributes. Journal of Environmental Management34 (1): 59-76.
16.
Greenbaum, R.2002. A spatial study of teachers’ salaries in Pennsylvania school districts. Journal of Labor Research23 (1): 69-86.
17.
Greenberg, M., P. Craighill, H. Mayer, C. Zukin, and J. Wells.2001. Brownfield redevelopment and affordable housing: A case study of New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate12 (3): 515-40.
18.
Greenberg, M., D. Schneider, and J. Parry.1995. Brown fields, a regional incinerator and resident perception of neighborhood quality. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment6:241-60.
19.
Greenstone, M., and Gallagher, J.2008. Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the Superfund program. Quarterly Journal of Economics123 (3): 951-1003.
20.
Guo, J., and C. Bhat.2007. Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: Application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography15 (1): 31-45.
21.
Hammel, D., and E. Wyly.1996. A model for identifying gentrified areas with census data. Urban Geography17 (3): 248-68.
22.
Hamnett, C.1991. The blind men and the elephant: The explanation of gentrification . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers16 (2): 173-89.
23.
Hamnett, C., and D. Whitelegg.2007. Loft conversion and gentrification in London: From industrial to postindustrial land use. Environment and Planning A39 (1): 106-24.
24.
Hird, J.1993. Environmental policy and equity: The case of Superfund . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12 (2): 323-43.
25.
Irwin, E.2002. The effects of open space on residential property values . Land Economics78 (4): 465-80.
26.
Kennedy, M., and P. Leonard.2001. Dealing with neighborhood change: A primer on gentrification and policy choices. Discussion paper, Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
27.
Kohlhase, J.1991. The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics30: 1-26.
28.
Kolko, J.2007. The determinants of gentrification. Manuscript.
29.
Leggett, C., and N. Bockstael.2000. Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management39 (2): 121-44.
30.
Leo, C.1998. Regional growth management regime: The case of Portland, Oregon. Journal of Urban Affairs20 (4): 363-94.
31.
Levine, M.1987. Downtown redevelopment as an urban growth strategy: A critical appraisal of the Baltimore Renaissance. Journal of Urban Affairs9 (2): 103-23.
32.
Ley, D.1986. Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: ACanadian assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers76 (4): 521-35.
33.
Ley, D.1996. The new middle class and the remaking of the central city . Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press .
34.
Ley, D., and C. Dobson.2008. Are there limits to gentrification? The contexts of impeded gentrification in Vancouver. Urban Studies45 (12): 2471-98.
35.
Litt, J., Tran, N., and Burke, T.2002. Examining urban brownfields through the public health ‘macroscope’. Environmental Health Perspectives110 (2): 183-193.
36.
McCluskey, J., and G. Rausser.2003. Stigmatized asset value: Is it temporary or long-term? Review of Economics and Statistics85 (2): 276-85.
37.
McMillen, D., and P. Thorsnes.2003. The aroma of Tacoma: Time varying average derivatives and the effect of a Superfund site on house prices. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics21:237-46.
38.
Messer, K., W. Schulze, K. Hackett, T. Cameron, and G. McClelland.2006. Can stigma explain large property value losses? The psychology and economics of Superfund. Environment and Resource Economics33:299-324.
39.
Mohai, P., and Saha, R.2006. Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research. Demography43(2): 383-399.
40.
Nelson, K.1988. Gentrification and distressed cities. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
41.
Nkrumah, W.2000. Issues simmering in Sunnyside. Oregonian , February 21.
42.
Nkrumah, W., and S. Learn.1999. Newcomers alter northeast neighborhood; Starbucks and other stores in Portland’s Sabin District signal rising home prices as African Americans are edged out. Oregonian , December 13.
43.
Noonan, D.2008. Evidence of environmental justice: A critical perspective on the practice of EJ research and lessons for policy design. Social Science Quarterly89(5): 1153-1174.
44.
O’Sullivan, A.2005. Gentrification and crime. Journal of Urban Economics57(1): 73-85.
45.
Peck, J.2005. Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29 (4): 740-70.
46.
Portney, K.2003. Taking sustainable cities seriously. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Quastel, N.2009. Political ecologies of gentrification. Urban Geography30 (7): 694-725.
48.
Sieg, H., V.K. Smith, H. Banzhaf, and R. Walsh.2004. Estimating the general equilibrium benefits of large changes in spatially delineated public goods. International Economic Review45 (4): 1047-77.
49.
Smith, N.1979. Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital not people. Journal of the American Planning Association45:538-48.
50.
Tiebout, C.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-24.
51.
Turnquist, K.1997. Spendy buildings, trendy restaurants push out first settlers it’s a trend: When artists move into a neglected area, developers hone in. Oregonian, August 3.
52.
Vigdor, J.2002. Does gentrification harm the poor? Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, Brookings Institution.
53.
Wang, F.2006. Quantitative methods and applications in GIS. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
54.
Wen, M., L. Hawkley, and J. Cacioppo.2006. Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated Health . Social Science and Medicine63 (10): 2575-90.
55.
Wolverton, A.2002. Does race matter? An examination of a polluting plant’s location decision. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Economics .
56.
Wyly, E., and D. Hammel.1999. Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate10 (4): 711-71.
