This article investigates the patterns and determinants of local impact-fee adoptions. The theoretical framework combines political market approaches based in interest-group theories of property rights and diffusion theories of innovation. Event history analysis is employed to estimate impact-fee adoptions in 66 Florida counties from 1977 to 2001. The empirical results demonstrate clear spatial and temporal patterns, showing that counties experiencing rapid growth actively adopted impact fees. The findings also provide several lessons. First, the development community has a significant influence on the adoption or nonadoption of impact fees. Second, intergovernmental constraints (or incentives) affect local choice. Third, counties are more likely to adopt impact fees as more neighboring counties have adopted them. Fourth, administrative capacity is a critical resource that influences impact fee adoptions. Fifth, the results confirm that rapid growth promotes impact fee adoptions.
Abrahamson, E., and L. Rosenkopf. 1993. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review18 (3): 487-517.
2.
Alston, L. J.1996. Empirical work in institutional economics. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 25-30. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
Altshuler, A. A., and J. Gomez-Ibanez. 1993. Regulation for revenue. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute.
4.
Banfield, E., and J. Q. Wilson. 1963. City politics. New York: Vintage Books.
5.
Benton, J. E.2002. County service delivery: Does government structure matter?Public Administration Review62 (4): 471-479.
6.
Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review84 (2): 395-415.
7.
Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1999. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the policy process, edited by P. A. Sabatier, 169-200. Colorado: Westview Press.
8.
Box-Steffensmeier, J., and B. Jones. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9.
Brace, P.1993. State government and economic performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
10.
Burge, G. 2004. A theoretical and empirical investigation of the effects of impact fees on the affordability of starter homes. Ph.D. diss., Florida State University.
11.
Clark, T. N., and E. Goez. 1994. The antigrowth machine: Can city governments control, limit or manage growth? In Urban innovations: Creative strategies for turbulent times, edited by T. N. Clarke, 105-145. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Clingermayer, J. C., and R. C. Feiock. 2001. Institutional constraints and policy choice. New York: SUNY Press.
13.
DeGrove, J. M.1986. Beyond the Growth Management Act of 1985. In Perspectives on Florida’s Growth Management Act of 1985, edited by J. Degrove, 191-197. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14.
DeSantis, V., and T. Renner. 1994. The impact of political structures on public policies in American counties. Public Administration Review54 (3): 291-295.
15.
Eggertsson, T.1990. Economic behavior and institutions. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
16.
Feiock, R. C., and J. Carr. 2001. Incentives, entrepreneurs, and boundary change: A collective action framework. Urban Affairs Review36 (3): 382-405.
17.
Feiock, R. C. and J. Kim. 2001. Form of government, administrative organization, and economic development. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11 (1): 29-49.
18.
Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations (FACIR). 1986. Impact fees in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: FACIR.
19.
Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations (FACIR). 1991. 1991 Florida impact fee report. Tallahassee, FL: FACIR.
20.
Frank, J., and P. Downing. 1988. Patterns of impact fees use. In Development impact fees, edited by A.C. Nelson, 3-21. Chicago: Planners Press.
21.
Goetz, E.1990. Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (2): 170-190.
22.
Goetz, E.1994. Expanding possibilities in local development policy: An examination of U.S. cities. Political Science Quarterly47 (1): 85-109.
23.
Greene, W. H.2003. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed.New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
24.
Juergensmeyer, J. C.1988. The development of regulatory impact fees: The legal issues. In Development impact fees, edited by A. C. Nelson, 96-112. Chicago: Planners Press.
25.
Knoke, D.1983. The spread of municipal reform: Temporal, spatial, and social dynamics. American Journal of Sociology87 (6): 1314-1339.
26.
Kolo, J., and T. J. Dicker. 1993. Practical issues in adopting local impact fees. State and Local Government Review25 (3): 197-206.
27.
Lee, R., R. Johnson, and P. Joyce. 2004. Public Budgeting Systems. 7th ed.Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
28.
Libecap, G. D.1989. Contracting for property rights. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
29.
Libecap, G. D.1996. Empirical work in institutional economics. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 34-58. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
30.
Lineberry, R.L., and E.P. Fowler. 1967. Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review61 (3): 701-716.
31.
Logan, J. R., and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. California: Univ. of California Press.
32.
Logan, J. R., R. B. Whaley, and K. Crowder. 1997. The character and consequences of growth regimes. Urban Affairs Review32 (5): 603-630.
33.
Lubell, M., R. C. Feiock, and R. Ramierez. 2005. Political institutions and conservation by local governments. Urban Affairs Review40 (6): 706-729.
34.
Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 148-163.
35.
Molotch, H.1976. Thecity as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology8 (2): 309-330.
36.
Morgan, D. R., and K. Kickham. 1999. Changing the form of county government: Effects on revenue and expenditure policy. Public Administration Review59 (4): 315-324.
37.
Nelson, A., ed. 1988. Development impact fees. Chicago: Planners Press.
38.
Nelson, A., and M. Moody. 2003. Impact fees: The grease that sustains local economic development. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39.
North, D.1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
40.
Ostrom, E.1999. Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process, edited by P.A. Sabatier, 37-52. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41.
Pagano, M. A.2002. Municipal capital spending during the “boom.”Public Budgeting & Finance22 (2): 1-20.
42.
Peterson, J., and T. McLoughlin. 1991. Debt policies and procedures. In Local government finance: Concepts and practices, edited by J. Peterson and D. Strachota, 293-320. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
43.
Riker, W., and I. Sened. 1996. A political theory of the origin of property rights: Airport slots. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 283-303. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
44.
Rogers, E.2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed.New York: Free Press.
45.
Ruhil, A.2003. Structural change and fiscal flows: A framework for analyzing the effects of urban events. Urban Affairs Review38 (3): 396-416.
46.
Schneider, M.1989. The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
47.
Schneider, M.1992. Understanding the growth machine: The missing link between local economic development and fiscal payoffs. Journal of Politics54 (1): 214-230.
48.
Schneider, M., and P. Teske. 1993. The antigrowth entrepreneur: Challenging the equilibrium of the growth machine. Journal of Politics55 (3): 720-736.
49.
Walker, J.1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review63 (3): 880-899.
50.
Yinger, J.1998. The incidence of development fees and special assessments. National Tax Journal51 (1): 23-41.
