In this article, the authors develop a political market framework to explain the circumstances under which Florid a counties will supply environmental public goods in the form of conservation amendments to county general plans. The framework emphasizes the role of local legislative and executive institutions as mediators of local policy change. Using count models and interaction terms, the analysis shows how the strength of real estate interests constrains the ability of professional county managers to pursue conservation policies. The findings reinforce the importance of developing theories of urban politics in which local political institutions are not transparent.
Alchian, A. A., and H. Demsetz. 1973. Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review62 (5): 777-795.
2.
Alston, L. J.1996. Empirical work in institutional economics. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
Benton, J. Edwin. 2002. County service delivery: Does government structure matter?Public Administration Review62 (4): 471-479.
4.
Clarke, S. E., and G. L. Gaile. 1989. Moving toward entrepreneurial development policies: Opportunities and barriers. Policy Studies Journal17 (2): 574-598.
5.
Clingermayer, J. C., and R. C. Feiock. 1993. Constituencies, campaign support, and council member intervention in city development policy. Social Science Quarterly74(1):199-215.
6.
Clingermayer, J. C., and R. C. Feiock. 2001. Institutional constraints and local policy choices: An exploration of local governance. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
7.
Denzau, A., and B. Weingast. 1982. Recent developments in zoning and property rights. Forward: The political economy of land use regulation. Urban Law Annual23:385-405.
8.
DeSantis, V., and T. Renner. 1994. The impact of political structures on public policies in American counties. Public Administration Review54 (3): 291-295.
9.
Donovan, T., and M. Neiman. 1992. Community social status, suburban growth, and local government restrictions on residential development. Urban Affairs Review28:323-336.
10.
Dunlap, R. E., and A. Mertig. 1992. American environmentalism. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
Elkins, D.1995. Testing competing explanations for the adoption of Type II polices. Urban Affairs Quarterly30:809-839.
13.
Feiock, R. C.1994. The political economy of growth management. American Politics Quarterly22:208-220.
14.
Feiock, R. C.2002. A quasi-market framework for local economic development competition. Journal of Urban Affairs24: 123-142.
15.
Feiock, R. C.2003. Politics, governance, and the complexity of local land use regulation. Urban Studies41 (2): 363-377.
16.
Feiock, R. C., and A. Taveras. 2002. County government institutions and local land regulation. In Analysis of local land markets and the impact of market regulations, edited by P. Cheshire and S. Sheppard.Cambridge, UK: Lincoln Land Institute.
17.
Fiedler, T., and De-Haven Smith, L.2000. Almanac of Florida politics 2000: The comprehensive guide to power, places, and policymakers. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
18.
Fleischmann, A.1986. The goals and strategies of local boundary changes: government organization or private gain. Journal of Urban Affairs4: 63-75.
19.
Gerber, E. R., and J. H. Phillips. 2004a. Direct democracy and land use policy: Exchanging public goods for development rights. Urban Studies41 (2): 463-479.
20.
Gerber, E. R., and J. H. Phillips. 2004b. Evaluating the effects of direct democracy on public policy: California’s urban growth boundaries. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago, 15-18, April.
21.
Goetz, E.1990. Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (2): 170-190.
22.
Goetz, E.1994. Expanding possibilities in local development policy: An examination of U.S. cities. Political Research Quarterly47 (1): 85-110.
23.
Gray, V., and D. Lowery. 1996. The population ecology of interest representation: Lobbying communities in the American states. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
24.
Greene, W. H.1994. Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models. Working Paper 94-10, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
25.
Greene, W. H.2000. Econometric analysis. 4th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Hinds, D., and N. Ordway. 1986. The influence of race on rezoning decisions: Equality of treatment in Black and White Census tracts, 1955-1980. Review of Black Political Economy: 25:51-63.
27.
Lewis P., and M. Neiman. 2002. Cities under pressure: Local growth controls and residential development policy. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
28.
Libecap, G.1989. Contracting for property rights. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
29.
Lineberry, R. L., and E. Fowler. 1967. Reformism and public policy in American cities. American Political Science Review61:701-715.
30.
Logan, J., and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
31.
Long, S.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Lubell, M.2003. Environmental governance, belief systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Forthcoming, Political Research Quarterly56 (3): 309-323.
33.
Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science46(1):148-163.
34.
Marando, V. L., and R. Thomas. 1977. The forgotten governments: County commissioners as policy makers. Gainesville: Univ. of Florida Press.
35.
Maser, S., W. Riker, and R. Rosett. 1977. The effects of zoning and externalities on the price of land: An empirical analysis of Monroe County, NY. Journal of Law and Economics20:111-132.
36.
Miller, G.2000. Above politics: Credible commitment and efficiency in the design of public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10:289-327.
37.
Molotch, H. L.1976. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology86:1387-1400.
38.
Morgan, D., and K. Kickham. 1999. Changing the form of county government: Effects on revenue and expenditure policy. Public Administration Review59 (4): 315-324.
39.
Nalbandian, J.1989. The contemporary role of city managers. American Review of Public Administration19:261-277.
40.
Navarro, P., and R. Carson. 1991. Growth controls: Policy analysis for the second generation. Policy Sciences24:127-152
41.
Ostrom, E.1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
42.
Ostrom, E.1999. Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process, edited by P. A. Sabatier, 35-72. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
Ostrom, E., R. Bish, and V. Ostrom. 1988. Local government in the United States. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
44.
Renner, T.2001. The local government management profession at century’s end. In Municipal yearbook, edited by the International City/County Management Association.Washington DC: International City/County Management Association.
45.
Peterson, P.1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
46.
Ruhil, A. V. S.2003. Structural change and fiscal flows: A framework for analyzing the effect of urban events. Urban Affairs Review38:396-414.
47.
Ruhil, A. V. S., M. Schneider, P. Teske, and B. -M. Ji.1999. Institutions and reform: Reinventing local government. Urban Affairs Review34 (3): 433-455.
48.
Schneider, M.1989. The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
49.
Schneider, M., and K. O. Park. 1989. Metropolitan counties as service delivery agents: The still forgotten governments. Public Administration Review49:345-352.
50.
Schneider, M., and P. Teske. 1995. The antigrowth entrepreneur: Challenging the equilibrium of the growth machine. The Journal of Politics55 (3): 720-736.
51.
Teske, P., and M. Schneider1994. The bureaucratic entrepreneur: The case of city managers. Public Administration Review54 (4): 331-340.
52.
StataCorp. 2003. Stata statistical software. Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Author.
53.
Stein, R., and R. M. Stein. 1990. Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
54.
Steinacker, A.1998. Economic restructuring in U.S. cities, suburbs, and non-metropolitan areas, 1977-1992. Urban Affairs Review34 (2): 212-229.
55.
Stone, C. N.1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: Univ. of Kansas Press.
56.
Tiebout, C.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-424.
