Although it is commonly held that accessibility plays a role in house price determination, there is less explicit recognition that it is transportation infrastructure that is primarily delivering that accessibility. Large additions to the transportation infrastructure tend to be well studied, but there is a dearth of empirical research that investigates the house price impacts when local transportation infrastructure is incrementally invested in. If these smaller investments also impact accessibility, then there should be a measurable impact in the housing market. Although results show that this is in fact the case for Cuyahoga County, Ohio, over the years 1995-2000, the price impact is not universally positive. The nature of the price impact depends on the location of the investment, relative to the house and regional accessibility points, and on how long ago the investment was completed.
Adair, A., S. McGreal, A. Smyth, J. Cooper, and T. Ryley. 2000. House price and accessibility: The testing of relationships within the Belfast urban area. Housing Studies15(5):699-716.
2.
Anselin, L., A. K. Bera, R. Florax, and M. J. Yoon. 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics26:77-104.
3.
Aschauer, D. A.1989. Is public expenditure productive?Journal of Monetary Economics23:177-200.
4.
Boarnet, M. G., and S. Chalermpong. 2001. New highways, house prices, and urban development: A case study of toll roads in Orange County, CA. Housing Policy Debate123:575-605.
5.
Boarnet, M. G., and A. F. Haughwout. 2000. Do highways matter? Evidence and policy implications of highways’ influence on metropolitan development. A discussion paper of the Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
6.
Bollinger, C. R., and K. R. Ihlanfeldt. 2003. The intraurban spatial distribution of employment: Which government interventions make a difference?Journal of Urban Economics53:396-412.
7.
Brueckner, Jan K.2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review23 (2):160-171.
8.
Chandra, A., and E. Thompson. 2000. Does public infrastructure affect economic activity? Evidence from the rural interstate highway system. Regional Science and Urban Economics30:457-490.
9.
Clapp, J. M., M. Rodriguez, and G. Thrall. 1997. How GIS can put urban economic analysis on the map?Journal of Housing Economics6:368-386.
10.
Craig, L. A., R. B. Palmquist, and T. Weiss. 1998. Transportation improvements and land values in the antebellum United States: A hedonic approach. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics16 (2):173-189.
11.
Des Rosiers, F., M. Theriault, and P.-Y. Villeneuve. 2000. Sorting out access and neighbourhood factors in hedonic price modeling. Journal of Property Investment & Finance18 (3):291-315.
12.
Downs, A.2004.Traffic: Why it’s getting worse, what the government can do. Policy Brief #128, the Brookings Institution.
13.
Fik, T. J., D. C. Ling, and G. F. Mulligan. 2003. Modeling spatial variation in housing prices: A variable interaction approach. Real Estate Economics31 (4):623-646.
14.
Garreau, J.1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.
15.
Gordon, P., and H. W. Richardson. 2000. Critiquing sprawl’s critics. Policy Analysis365. The Cato Institute.
16.
Gramlich, E. M.1994. Infrastructure investment: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature32:1176-1196.
17.
Griffith, D. A., and C. G. Amrhein. 1997. Multivariate statistical analysis for geographers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Haughwout, A. F.1997. Central city infrastructure investment and suburban house values. Regional Science and Urban Economics27:199-215.
19.
Haughwout, A. F.1999. State infrastructure and the geography of employment. Growth and Change30 (4):549-566.
20.
Henneberry, J.1998. Transport investment and house prices. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment16 (2):144-158.
21.
Lang, R. E.2000. Office sprawl: The evolving geography of business. The Brookings Institution, Survey Series, Washington DC.
22.
Lipscomb, C.2003. Small cities matter, too: The impacts of an airport and local infrastructure on housing prices in a small urban city. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies15 (3):255-273.
23.
Mikelbank, B. A., and R. W. Jackson. 2000. The role of space in public capital research. International Regional Science Review23:235-258.
24.
Mills, E. S.1967. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economics Review Papers Proceedings57:197-211.
25.
Mohring, H.1961. Land values and the measurement of highway benefits. The Journal of Political Economy69 (3):236-249.
26.
Munnell, A. H.1990. Why has productivity declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic ReviewJanuary/February:3-22.
27.
Muth, R. F.1969. Cities and housing. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
28.
Nelson, A. C., and M. Moody. 2000. Effect of beltways on metropolitan economic activity. Journal of Urban Planning and Development126 (4):189-196.
29.
Nelson, A. C., and T. W. Sanchez. 1997. Exurban and suburban households: A departure from traditional location theory?Journal of Housing Research8 (2):249-276.
30.
The Ohio ES202 Network. 2002. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://www.ohioes202network.org/
31.
Pior, M.-Y., and E. Shimizu. 2001. GIS-aided evaluation system for infrastructure improvements: Focusing on simple hedonic and Rosen’s two-step approaches. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems25:223-246.
32.
Rietveld, P., and R. Vickerman. 2004. Transport in regional science: The “death of distance” is premature. Papers in Regional Science83:229-248.
33.
Siethoff, B. T., and K. Kockelman. 2002. Property values and highway expansions: Timing, size, location, and use effects. Transportation Research Record, 1812:191-200.
34.
Smersh, G. T., and M. T. Smith. 2000. Accessibility change and urban house price appreciation: A constrained optimization approach to determining distance effects. Journal of Housing Economics9:187-196.
35.
So, H. M., T. Y. C. Tse, and S. Ganesan. 1997. Estimating the influence of transport on house prices: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment15 (1):40-47.
36.
Squires, G. D.2002. Urban sprawl and the uneven development of metropolitan America. In Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences, and policy responses, edited by G. D. Squires, 1-22. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
