Identity-based discrimination experiences have been associated with intimate partner aggression (IPA) use, yet very little research has examined sexist discrimination. This study explored whether women's experiences of sexist discrimination are associated with their IPA use. Participants were 626 predominantly white, cisgender, heterosexual women who completed self-report measures online. Women's sexist experiences were significantly and positively correlated with their IPA use, even after controlling for recent stressful experiences and gender-based violence exposures. Psychological distress symptoms significantly mediated the relation between sexist experiences and IPA use. The findings demonstrate the importance of considering the role of sexism in women's IPA.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651
3.
AvnaimS.MurphyC. M.Miles-McLeanH. A. (2022). How do women in treatment for intimate partner violence perpetration perceive their abusive behavior?Psychology of Violence, 12(5), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000427
4.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
5.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
6.
BouletJ.BossM. W. (1991). Reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(3), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.433
7.
BuhrmesterM. D.TalaifarS.GoslingS. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516
8.
CraddockN.GentiliC.PhoenixA.WhiteP.DiedrichsP. C.BarlowF. K. (2023). Investigating the role of perceived ingroup and outgroup colourism on body image and wellbeing among Black, Asian, and other racialised/ethnic minority groups living in the UK. Body Image, 46, 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.06.010
DerogatisL. R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual (4th ed.). Pearson.
11.
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M.NealA. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038656
12.
EnnsC. Z. (2012). Feminist approaches to counseling. In AltmaierE. M.HansenJ.-I. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 434–459). Oxford University Press.
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
14.
FlynnA.GrahamK. (2010). “Why did it happen?” A review and conceptual framework for research on perpetrators’ and victims’ explanations for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.01.002
15.
FrostD. M.MeyerI. H. (2023). Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance. Current Opinions in Psychology, 51(101579), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101579
16.
GoldensonJ.SpidelA.GreavesC.DuttonD. (2009). Female perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Within-group heterogeneity, related psychopathology, and a review of current treatment with recommendations for the future. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 18(7), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770903231791
17.
HambergerL. K.LarsenS. E. (2015). Men’s and women’s experience of intimate partner violence: A review of ten years of comparative studies in clinical samples; Part I. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9732-8
18.
HambyS. (2014). Intimate partner and sexual violence research: Scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 15(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014520723
19.
HambyS. (2017). A scientific answer to a scientific question: The gender debate on intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015596963
20.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
21.
HinesD. A.DouglasE. M. (2010). A closer look at men who sustain intimate terrorism by women. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.286
22.
Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2005). Male versus female intimate partner violence: Putting controversial findings into context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00203.x
23.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 27.0.
25.
JohnsonM. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.006
26.
JonesR. T.BrowneK.ChouS. (2017). A critique of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales-2 (CTS-2). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.005
27.
KernsmithP. (2005). Exerting power or striking back: A gendered comparison of motivations for domestic violence perpetration. Violence and Victims, 20(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2005.20.2.173
28.
KimH. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
29.
KlonoffE. A.LandrineH. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 439–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x
30.
KohnP. M.MacdonaldJ. E. (1992). The survey of recent life experiences: A decontaminated hassles scale for adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848327
31.
KubiakS.KimW. J.FedockG.BybeeD. (2015). Testing a violence-prevention intervention for incarcerated women using a randomized control trial. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514534300
32.
LaranceL. Y. (2006). Serving women who use force in their intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 12(7), 622–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206290240
33.
LaranceL. Y.GoodmarkL.MillerS. L.DasguptaS. D. (2019). Understanding and addressing women’s use of force in intimate relationships: A retrospective. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218815776
34.
LaranceL. Y.Hoffman-RuzickaA.ShivasJ. B. (2009). VISTA: A program for women who use violence, curriculum guide. Jersey Center for Nonviolence.
35.
LaranceL. Y.MillerS. L. (2017). In her own words: Women describe their use of force resulting in court-ordered intervention. Violence Against Women, 23(12), 1536–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216662340
36.
LeisringP. A. (2011). Top 10 reasons why women’s perpetration of intimate partner violence is an important area of inquiry. Partner Abuse, 2(4), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.2.4.452
37.
MaldonadoA. I.MurphyC. M.DavisM.EvansM. K.ZondermanA. B. (2022). Racial discrimination, mental health symptoms, and intimate partner violence perpetration in Black adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 90(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000712
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
40.
Miles-McLeanH.LissM.ErchullM. J.RobertsonC. M.HagermanC.GnolebaM. A.PappL. J. (2015). “Stop looking at me!”: Interpersonal sexual objectification as a source of insidious trauma. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314561018
41.
Miles-McLeanH. A.LaMotteA. D.WilliamsM. R.MurphyC. M. (2021a). Trauma exposure and PTSD among women receiving treatment for intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), NP6083–NP6826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518820634
42.
Miles-McLeanH. A.MaldonadoA. I.MurphyC. M. (2021b). Sexist discrimination and women’s use of intimate partner aggression: Results from a nationally representative sample of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320974110
43.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.KruegerR. G.MagdolL.MargolinG.SilvaP. A.SydnetR. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47
44.
MoradiB.DeBlaereC. (2010). Women’s experiences of sexist discrimination: Review of research and directions for centralizing race, ethnicity, and culture. In LandrineH.RussoN. F. (Eds.), Handbook of diversity in feminist psychology (pp. 173–210). Springer Publishing Company.
45.
Morrow-HowellN.GonzalesE. (2023). Explicating ageism in the productive aging framework. The Gerontologist, gnad156. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad156
46.
MurphyC. M.HooverS. A.TaftC. (1999). The multidimensional measure of emotional abuse: Factor structure and subscale validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Toronto, Canada.
47.
NadalK. L.HaynesK. (2012). The effects of sexism, gender microaggressions, and other forms of discrimination on women’s mental health and development. In Lundberg-LoveP. K.NadalK. L.PaludiM. A. (Eds.), Women’s psychology. Women and mental disorders (pp. 87–101). Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
48.
OkudaM.OlfsonM.WangS.RubioJ. M.YangX.BlancoC. (2015). Correlates of intimate partner violence perpetration: Results from a national epidemiologic survey. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21986
49.
OswaldD. L.BaalbakiM.KirkmanM. (2019). Experiences with benevolent sexism: Scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0933-5
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
52.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
53.
ResickP. A.MonsonC. M.ChardK. M. (2017). Cognitive processing therapy for PTSD: A comprehensive manual. The Guilford Press.
54.
RoE.LawrenceE. (2007). Comparing three measures of psychological aggression: Psychometric properties and differentiation from negative communication. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9109-8
55.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
56.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
57.
StrausM. A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.332
58.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
59.
StueveA.O’DonnellL. (2008). Urban young women’s experiences of discrimination and community violence and intimate partner violence. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 85(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9265-z
60.
SwanS. C.SchrammA. T.RiveraE. A.WarrenP.WhiteC. N.SatcherL. (2018). A feminist analysis of women’s aggression in intimate relationships. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W.RutherfordA.WilliamsW. S.CookS. L.WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA Handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women’s private and public lives (pp. 253–269). American Psychological Association.
61.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Research report. National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181867.pdf
VegaE. M.O’LearyK. D. (2007). Test-retest reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Violence, 22, 703–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9118-7
64.
WolfeJ.KimerlingR. (1997). Gender issues in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. In WilsonJ.KeaneT. M. (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 192–238). Guilford.
65.
ZuckerA. N.LandryL. J. (2007). Embodied discrimination: The relation of sexism and distress to women’s drinking and smoking behaviors. Sex Roles, 56, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9163-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
