This systematic review synthesizes prevalence rates and associated factors of intimate partner violence (IPV) against emerging adult women (aged 18–30) belonging to the Millennial and Generation Z cohorts. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search of Web of Science, PsycINFO and Scopus was conducted for the period between January 2013 and November 2025. Twenty-six studies from 20 high-income and 6 upper-middle-income Western countries met the inclusion criteria. Findings reveal significant methodological heterogeneity, with lifetime IPV prevalence ranging from 0.16% to 58.42% and 12-month rates from 5.1% to 33.6%. Notably, women aged 18 to 30 consistently ranked among the highest-prevalence groups, often exceeding WHO estimates despite shorter cumulative exposure. Psychological violence was the most prevalent subtype. Key associated factors included individual vulnerabilities (mental health, substance use, non-heterosexual orientation and childhood abuse), specific relational dynamics (economic dependence, “dirty dating,” digital surveillance, breakup-reconciliation cycles and parenthood) and broader contexts such as neighbourhood deprivation, access to resources and help-seeking behaviour and the “Nordic Paradox” or backlash against gender equality. These findings highlight emerging adulthood as a critical period of vulnerability, necessitating targeted, generationally relevant interventions that address the unique developmental and digital risks of this cohort.
ArnettJ. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
2.
ArundelR. (2017). Equity inequity: Housing wealth inequality, inter and intra-generational divergences, and the rise of private landlordism. Housing, Theory and Society, 34(2), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1284154
3.
BacchusL. J.RanganathanM.WattsC.DevriesK. (2018). Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open, 8, e019995. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019995
4.
BaraltL.CarianE. K.JohnsonA. L.LimS.YoonS. Y. (2020). Millennials and gender in an era of growing inequality. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420915870
5.
*BarbierA.ChariotP.LefèvreT. (2022). Intimate partner violence against ever-partnered women in Europe: Prevalence and associated factors—Results from the violence against women EU-wide survey. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1033465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1033465
6.
Betts RazaviT. (2024). The lost boys? A call to examine gender equality attitudes and the men of Gen Z. SN Social Sciences, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00805-5
7.
BeyerK.WallisA. B.HambergerL. K. (2015). Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013515758
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
10.
*Castro-AlvesJ.BastosF. I.CoboB.De BoniR. B. (2023). Physical violence against women in Brazil: Findings from the 3rd Brazilian household survey on substance use. Global Public Health, 18(1), 2244032. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2244032
11.
*ChandanJ. S.GokhaleK. M.Bradbury-JonesC.NirantharakumarK.BandyopadhyayS.TaylorJ. (2020). Exploration of trends in the incidence and prevalence of childhood maltreatment and domestic abuse recording in UK primary care: A retrospective cohort study using ‘the health improvement network’database. BMJ Open, 10(6), e036949. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036949
12.
ChughR.GuggisbergM. (2022). Stalking and other forms of dating violence: Lessons learned from You in relation to cyber safety. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP6760–NP6784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520966674
13.
CoppJ. E.GiordanoP. C.LongmoreM. A.ManningW. D. (2019). The development of attitudes toward intimate partner violence: An examination of key correlates among a sample of young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(7), 1357–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651311
14.
CorreiaI.AlvesH.MoraisR.RamosM. (2015). The legitimation of wife abuse among women: The impact of belief in a just world and gender identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.041
15.
CraparoG.GoriA.PetruccelliI.CannellaV.SimonelliC. (2014). Intimate partner violence: Relationships between alexithymia, depression, attachment styles, and coping strategies of battered women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(6), 1484–1494. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12505
16.
CunninghamM.L. AndersonK. (2023). Women experience more intimate partner violence than men over the life course: Evidence for gender asymmetry at all ages in a national sample. Sex Roles, 89(11), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01423-4
17.
DavidovE.MeulemanB.CieciuchJ.SchmidtP.BillietJ. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
18.
DavisL. S.CrainE. E. (2024). Intimate partner violence in the LGBTQ+ community: Implications for family court professionals. Family Court Review, 62(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12765
19.
*De VasconcelosN. M.AndradeF. M. D. D.GomesC. S.PintoI. V.MaltaD. C. (2019). Prevalence and factors associated with intimate partner violence against adult women in Brazil: National Survey of Health, 2019. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 24, e210020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720210020.supl.2
20.
DevriesK. M.ChildJ. C.BacchusL. J.MakJ.FalderG.GrahamK.WattsC.HeiseL. (2014). Intimate partner violence victimization and alcohol consumption in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction, 109(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12393
21.
DevriesK. M.MakJ. Y. T.García-MorenoC.PetzoldM.ChildJ. C.FalderG.BacchusL. M.EngellR. E.RosenfeldL.PallittoC.VosT.AbrahamsN.WattsC. H. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 340(6140), 1527–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240937
DokkedahlS. B.KirubakaranR.Bech-HansenD.KristensenT. R.ElklitA. (2022). The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Systematic Reviews, 11, 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02025-z
24.
DokkedahlS.KokR. N.MurphyS.KristensenT. R.Bech-HansenD.ElklitA. (2019). The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1118-1
25.
DuerksenK. N.WoodinE. M. (2019). Technological intimate partner violence: Exploring technology-related perpetration factors and overlap with in-person intimate partner violence. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.001
26.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M.NealA. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0038656
29.
Eggers del CampoI.SteinertJ. I. (2022). The effect of female economic empowerment interventions on the risk of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 810–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020976088
30.
Exner-CortensD.EckenrodeJ.RothmanE. (2013). Longitudinal associations between teen dating violence victimization and adverse health outcomes. Pediatrics, 131, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1029
31.
FadillahD.LongB. (2025). Empowering Gen Z’s Mental Health in a Hyperconnected World. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 207640251384510. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251384510
32.
*FanslowJ.HashemiL.MalihiZ.GulliverP.McIntoshT. (2021). Change in prevalence rates of physical and sexual intimate partner violence against women: Data from two cross-sectional studies in New Zealand, 2003 and 2019. BMJ Open, 11(3), e044907. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044907
33.
*FanslowJ.MalihiZ.HashemiL.GulliverP.McIntoshT. (2021). Change in prevalence of psychological and economic abuse, and controlling behaviours against women by an intimate partner in two cross-sectional studies in New Zealand, 2003 and 2019. BMJ Open, 11(3), e044910. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044910
34.
*FantasiaH. C.SutherlandM. A.HutchinsonM. K. (2018). Lifetime and recent experiences of violence among college women. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 14(4), 190–197. http://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000211
35.
FloodM.DragiewiczM.PeaseB. (2021). Resistance and backlash to gender equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.137
36.
FloodM.PeaseB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
37.
FoulkesL.AndrewsJ. L. (2023). Are mental health awareness efforts contributing to the rise in reported mental health problems? A call to test the prevalence inflation hypothesis. New Ideas in Psychology, 69, 101010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101010
FuY. (2022, September23–25). Research on the influences of social media to gender equality. SHS Web of Conferences, Changsha, China. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214803026
40.
García-SenlleM. L.Martín-FernándezM.ConchellR.ArrojoS.LilaM. (2024). Do boys empathize less than girls? Exploring the links among empathy, gender and sexist attitudes in adolescents. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111065
41.
Garrett-WalkerJ. J.MontagnoM. J. (2023). Queering labels: Expanding identity categories in LGBTQ + research and clinical practice. Journal of LGBT Youth, 20(4), 865–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2021.1896411
42.
GillespieB.YoshihamaM. (2002). Age adjustment and recall bias in the analysis of domestic violence data. Violence Against Women, 17(3), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010222183239
43.
GraciaE. (2004). Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: Towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(7), 536–537. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019604
GraciaE.TomásJ. M. (2014). Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population. Violence Against Women, 20, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520577
46.
*GraciaE.García-SenlleM.Martín-FernándezM.LilaM. (2023). High prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in young adulthood: Is prevention failing?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(17–18):10205–10233. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231172479
47.
GraciaE.LilaM.SantirsoF. A. (2020). Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: A systematic review. European Psychologist, 25(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000392
*GrigaitėU.Azeredo-LopesS.ŽeimėE.SlotkusP. Y.HeitmayerM.AluhD. O.PedrosaB.SilvaM.Santos-DiasM.CardosoG.Caldas-de-AlmeidaJ. M. (2024). Prevalence and acceptability of psychological and/or economic intimate partner violence, and utilization of mental health services by its survivors in Lithuania. Journal of Public Health, 46(2), e248–e257. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae015
50.
Halpern-MeekinS.ManningW. D.GiordanoP. C.LongmoreM. A. (2013). Relationship churning, physical violence, and verbal abuse in young adult relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01029.x
51.
HeiseL. (2011). What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. STRIVE Research Consortium, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/21062/
52.
*HerbertA.HeronJ.BarterC.SzilassyE.BarnesM.HoweL. D.FederG.FraserA. (2021). Risk factors for intimate partner violence and abuse among adolescents and young adults: Findings from a UK population-based cohort. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 176. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16106.3
53.
HeronR. L.EismaM.BrowneK. (2022). Why do female domestic violence victims remain in or leave abusive relationships? A qualitative study. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 31(5), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2021.2019154
54.
*HisasueT.KruseM.RaitanenJ.PaavilainenE.RissanenP. (2020). Quality of life, psychological distress and violence among women in close relationships: A population-based study in Finland. BMC Women’s Health, 20, 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00950-6
55.
*JeffreyN. K.BarataP. C. (2021). Intimate partner sexual violence among Canadian university students: Incidence, context, and perpetrators’ perceptions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 2123–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02006-8
56.
Jiménez-PicónN.Romero-MartínM.Romero-CastilloR.Palomo-LaraJ. C.Alonso-RuízM. (2023). Internalization of the romantic love myths as a risk factor for gender violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20(3), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00747-2
57.
JohnsonW. L.GiordanoP. C.ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A. (2015) The age-IPV curve: Changes in the perpetration of intimate partner violence during adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(3), 708–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0158-z
58.
KamimuraA.YoshihamaM.BybeeD. (2013). Trajectory of intimate partner violence and healthcare seeking over the life course: Study of Japanese women in the Tokyo metropolitan area, Japan. Public Health, 127(10), 902–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.06.003
59.
*KatsosK.SakelliadisE. I.ZorbaE.TsitsikaA.PapadodimaS.SpiliopoulouC. (2020). Intimate partner violence in Greece: A study of 664 consecutive forensic clinical examinations. Family Practice, 37(6), 801–806. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaa052
60.
KimJ.KweonY. (2022). Why do young men oppose gender quotas? Group threat and backlash to legislative gender quotas. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 47, 991–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12371.
61.
KnightK. E.MenardS.SimmonsS. B.BouffardL. A.OrsiR. (2016). Life course and intergenerational continuity of intimate partner aggression and physical injury: A 20-year study. Violence and Victims, 31(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00188
62.
KorkmazS.ÖverlienC.LagerlöfH. (2020). Youth intimate partner violence: Prevalence, characteristics, associated factors and arenas of violence. Nordic Social Work Research, 12(4), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1848908
63.
KosarS.MuruthiB.ShiversC.ZarateJ.ByronJ. (2023). Millennials and Generation Z: Men’s perspectives on hashtag feminism. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 31, 478–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265231175832
64.
KrausL.RoomR.LivingstonM.PennayA.HolmesJ.TörrönenJ. (2020). Long waves of consumption or a unique social generation? Exploring recent declines in youth drinking. Addiction Research & Theory, 28, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2019.1629426
65.
*KusunokiY.BevilacquaK.BarberJ. S. (2023). The dynamics of intimate relationships and violent victimization among young women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 3344–3372. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221106131
66.
LeenE.SorbringE.MawerM.HoldsworthE.HelsingB.BowenE. (2013). Prevalence, dynamic risk factors and the efficacy of primary interventions for adolescent dating violence: An international review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.015
67.
*LeiteF. M. C.AmorimM. H. C.WehrmeisterF. C.GiganteD. P. (2017). Violence against women, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Revista de Saude Publica, 51, 33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006815
68.
LiangW. (2024). The impact of social comparison processes on psychological well-being: how social media, self-evaluation, and education policies affect the mental health of gen-z students. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 8(06), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2024.v08i06.003
69.
*Lledo-RandoC.Perles-NovasF.San-Martin GarciaJ. (2023). Prevalence of psychological violence in young people in the South of Spain: Implications for prevention. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 17(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.7877
70.
LoxtonD.Dolja-GoreX.AndersonA. E.TownsendN. (2017). Intimate partner violence adversely impacts health over 16 years and across generations: A longitudinal cohort study. PLOS ONE, 12, e0178138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178138
71.
MachadoA.SousaC.CunhaO. (2024). Bidirectional violence in intimate relationships: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(2), 1680–1694. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231193440
72.
*MavrikiouP. M.ApostolidouM.ParlalisS. K. (2014). Risk factors for the prevalence of domestic violence against women in Cyprus. The Social Science Journal, 51(2), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.02.002
73.
McCoyJ.RahmanT.SomerM. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
74.
McGorryP. D.MeiC.DalalN.Alvarez-JimenezM.BlakemoreS. J.BrowneV.DooleyB.HickieI. B.JonesP. B.McDaidD.MihalopoulosC.WoodS. J.El AzzouziF. A.FazioJ.GowE.HanjabamS.HayesA.MorrisA.PangE.. . . KillackeyE. (2024). The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 11(9), 731–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00163-9
75.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
76.
*MoroskoskiM.BritoF. A. M. D.QueirozR. O.HigarashiI. H.OliveiraR. R. D. (2021). Aumento da violência física contra a mulher perpetrada pelo parceiro íntimo: Uma análise de tendência. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 26, 4993–5002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320212611.3.02602020
77.
MunnZ.MoolaS.LisyK.RiitanoD.TufanaruC. (2015). Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and incidence data. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000054
78.
NomamiukorF. O.WiscoB. E. (2024). Social media’s impact on rape myth acceptance and negative affect in college women: Examining the #MeToo and #HimToo movement. Violence Against Women, 30(6–7), 1498–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231181045
79.
*NyberghL.TaftC.EnanderV.KrantzG. (2013). Self-reported exposure to intimate partner violence among women and men in Sweden: Results from a population-based survey. BMC Public Health, 13, 845. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-845
80.
OffG.CharronN.AlexanderA. (2022). Who perceives women’s rights as threatening to men and boys? Explaining modern sexism among young men in Europe. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 909811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.909811
81.
OrtegaR.SánchezV. (2011). Juvenil dating and violence. In MonksC.CoyneI. (Eds.). Bullying in different contexts (pp. 113–136). Cambridge University Press.
82.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
86.
RenströmE.BäckH. (2024). Manfluencers and young men’s misogynistic attitudes: The role of perceived threats to men’s status. Sex Roles, 90, 1787–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01538-2
87.
RodríguezE.CalderónD.KuricS.SanmartínA. (2021). Barómetro Juventud y Género 2021: Identidades, representaciones y experiencias en una realidad social compleja. Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, Fad. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5205628
88.
RollèL.GiardinaG.CaldareraA. M.GerinoE.BrustiaP. (2018). When intimate partner violence meets same sex couples: A review of same sex intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506
89.
RowlandsI. J.HolderC.ForderP. M.HegartyK. L.DobsonA. J.LoxtonD. (2020). Consistency and inconsistency of young women’s reporting of intimate partner violence in a population-based study. Violence Against Women, 27, 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220908324
90.
Rubio-GarayF.López-GonzálezM. A.CarrascoM. Á.AmorP. J. (2017). The prevalence of dating violence: A systematic review. Papeles del Psicólogo, 38, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2017.2831
91.
Ruiz-PalominoE.Ballester-ArnalR.Giménez-GarcíaC.Gil-LlarioM. D. (2021). Influence of beliefs about romantic love on the justification of abusive behaviors among early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 92, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.09.001
92.
*Ruiz-PérezI.Escribà-AgüirV.Montero-PiñarI.Vives-CasesC.Rodríguez-BarrancoM. (2016). Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Spain: A national cross-sectional survey in primary care. Atención Primaria, 49(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2016.03.006
93.
Sánchez-PradaA.Delgado-AlvarezC.Bosch-FiolE.Ferreiro-BasurtoV.Ferrer-PerezV. A. (2020). Psychosocial implications of supportive attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women throughout the lifecycle. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6055. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176055
94.
Sanmartín OrtíA.Kuric KardelisS.Gómez MiguelA. (2022). La caja de la masculinidad: Construcción, actitudes e impacto en la juventud española [Masculinity box: Construction, attitudes and impact among Spanish youth]. Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, Fundación Fad Juventud. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7319236
95.
SantirsoA.F.ArrojoS. (2023). Violencia contra la mujer en las relaciones de pareja. In E. Gracia, and LilaM. (Eds.), Intervención social y comunitaria basada en la evidencia–. McGraw Hill.
96.
Sanz-BarberoB.CorradiC.Otero-GarcíaL.AyalaA.Vives-CasesC. (2018). The effect of macrosocial policies on violence against women: A multilevel study in 28 European countries. International Journal of Public Health, 63, 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1143-1
97.
*Sanz-BarberoB.PereiraP. L.BarrioG.Vives-CasesC. (2018). Intimate partner violence against young women: Prevalence and associated factors in Europe. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 72, 611–616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-209701
98.
Sanz-BarberoB.SaurinaC.SerraL.VicensG. R.CasanovasL. V. L.Otero-GarcíaL.José LópezM.PerezG.Vives-CasesC. (2021). Prevalence and associated factors with sexual violence victimisation youth before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study in Spain. BMJ Open, 11(11), e055227. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055227
99.
SardinhaL.Maheu-GirouxM.StöcklH.MeyerS. R.García-MorenoC. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. The Lancet, 26, 399(10327), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7
100.
*SignorelliM. C.de SouzaF. G.PinheiroR. V. B.JuniorValenteJ.AndreoniS.RezendeL. F. M. D.SanchezZ. V. D. M. (2023). Panorama of intimate partner violence against women in Brazil and its association with self-perception of health: Findings from a national representative survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13–14), 8453–8475. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231155141
101.
StonardK. E. (2021). The prevalence and overlap of technology-assisted and offline adolescent dating violence. Current Psychology, 40(3), 1056–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0023-4
102.
SzekeresH.ShumanE.SaguyT. (2020). Views of sexual assault following# MeToo: The role of gender and individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110203
TomaszewskaP.SchusterI. (2021). Prevalence of teen dating violence in Europe: A systematic review of studies since 2010. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20437
105.
TörrönenJ.RoumeliotisF.SamuelssonE.KrausL.RoomR. (2019). Why are young people drinking less than earlier? Identifying and specifying social mechanisms with a pragmatist approach. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 64, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.001
106.
UNESCO. (2009). World report: Investing in cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. UNESCO Publishing.
107.
Van LaarC.Van RossumA.Kosakowska-BerezeckaN.BongiornoR.BlockK. (2024). MANdatory-why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1263313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1263313
108.
*ViejoC.RincónP.Ortega-RuizR. (2018). Physical violence in young Chilean couples: Association with the relationship quality. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.021
109.
VoithL. A. (2019). Understanding the relation between neighborhoods and intimate partner violence: An integrative review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017717744
110.
WaltermaurerE. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012447699
WemrellM.LilaM.GraciaE.IvertA. K. (2020). The Nordic Paradox and intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) in Sweden: A background overview. Sociology Compass, 14, e12759. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12759
113.
WhiteS. J.SinJ.SweeneyA.SalisburyT.WahlichC.Montesinos GuevaraC. M.GillardS.BrettE.AllwrightL.IqbalN.KhanA.PerotC.MarksJ.MantovaniN. (2024). Global prevalence and mental health outcomes of intimate partner violence among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(1), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231155529
114.
WilsonI. M.GrahamK.TaftA. (2017). Living the cycle of drinking and violence: A qualitative study of women’s experience of alcohol-related intimate partner violence. Drug and Alcohol Review, 36(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12405
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018. Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization on behalf of the United Nations Inter-Agency Working Group on Violence Against Women Estimation and Data (UNICEF, UNFPA, UNODC, UNSD, UNWomen).
117.
YbarraM. L.EspelageD. L.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.KorchmarosJ. D.BoydD. (2016). Lifetime prevalence rates and overlap of physical, psychological, and sexual dating abuse perpetration and victimization in a national sample of youth. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0748-9
118.
YoshihamaM.GillespieB.HammockA. C.BelliR. F.TolmanR. M. (2005). Does the life history calendar method facilitate the recall of intimate partner violence? Comparison of two methods of data collection. Violence and Victims, 29(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/29.3.151
119.
ZahnR.LytheK. E.GethinJ. A.GreenS.DeakinJ. F. W.YoungA. H.MollJ. (2015). The role of self-blame and worthlessness in the psychopathology of major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 186, 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.001
120.
*ŽukauskienėR.KaniušonytėG.BakaitytėA.Truskauskaitė-KunevičienėI. (2021). Prevalence and patterns of intimate partner violence in a nationally representative sample in Lithuania. Journal of Family Violence, 36, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00126-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
