Using a mixed-methods triangulation approach we piloted the Composite Abuse Scale—Brazilian version (CAS-Brazil) at the House of the Brazilian Woman of Curitiba among 62 survivors of intimate partner violence and four professionals serving survivors to assess its feasibility for use. Quantitative data were tabulated using descriptive statistics while qualitative data were recorded, coded, and thematically analyzed. Four qualitative domains emerged: (a) conceptual understanding; (b) item definitions; (c) women's experiences; and (d) professionals’ perspectives. Comprehension of the CAS-Brazil appeared high across participants from diverse backgrounds. Professionals viewed it as highly feasible for use in Brazilian cross-sectoral services to support survivor decision-making.
AlmeidaJ.RochaR.SignorelliM.SilvaV.PradoS.EvansD. (2020). The house of the Brazilian woman: Impacts of a cross-sectoral public health policy for abused women. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Suppl 5), v882. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.945
BottS.GuedesA.Ruiz-CelisA. P.MendozaJ. A. (2021). Intimate partner violence in the Americas: A systematic review and reanalysis of national prevalence estimates. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health, 45(e34), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.34
4.
Brasil. Lei n° 11.340, de 7 de agosto de 2006 [Law number 11.340,August 7, 2006]. Cria mecanismos para coibir a violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, nos termos do § 8° do art. 226 da Constituição Federal, da Convenção sobre a Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação contra as Mulheres e da Convenção Interamericana para Prevenir, Punir e Erradicar a Violência contra a Mulher; dispõe sobre a criação dos Juizados de Violência Doméstica e Familiar contra a Mulher; altera o Código de Processo Penal, o Código Penal e a Lei de Execução Penal; e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2006/Lei/L11340.htm
5.
Brasil. Lei n° 13.104, de 9 de março de 2015 [Law number 13.104, March 9, 2015]. Altera o art. 121 do Decreto-Lei n° 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 - Código Penal, para prever o feminicídio como circunstância qualificadora do crime de homicídio, e o art. 1° da Lei n° 8.072, de 25 de julho de 1990, para incluir o feminicídio no rol dos crimes hediondos. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13104.htm
Burjalés-MartíM. D.Rigol-CuadraM. A.Anguiano-CarrascoC.Martorell-PovedaA.Jiménez-HerreraM. F.Fuentes-PumarolaC.Rodríguez-MartínD.Galbany-EstraguésP.Ballester-ferrandoD. (2018). Scale for the study of nursing students’ perception of intimate partner violence: Adaptation and validation. Nurse Education Today, 65(June 2017), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.025
8.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD. W.GlassN. (2009). The danger assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317180
9.
CasesC. V.DomínguezJ. T.PortiñoM. C.Espinar-RuizE.Gil-GonzálezD. M.GoicoleaI. (2015). Validación de la versión española del cuestionario PREMIS. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 89(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-57272015000200006
Escriba-AgüirV.Ruiz-PerezI.ArtazcozL.Martin-BaenaD.Royo-MarquesM.Vanaclocha-EspíM. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the “abuse assessment screen” among pregnant women. Public Health Nursing, 33(3), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12232
12.
EvansD. P.Xavier HallC. D.da RochaR. W. G.PradoS. M.SignorelliM. C. (2022). These questions have everything that happens to me: Analysis of a femicide risk assessment tool for abused women in Brazil. Journal of Family Violence, 37, 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1
13.
EvansM.GregoryA.FederG.HowarthE.HegartyK. (2015). Even ‘daily’ is not enough: How well do we measure domestic violence and abuse?—A think-aloud study of a commonly used self-report scale. Violence and Victims, 31(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00024
14.
FisherJ.TranT. D.BiggsB.TranT. (2014). Validation of the intimate bonds measure for women who are pregnant or have recently given birth in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 6(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12011
15.
Ford-GilboeM.WathenC. N.VarcoeC.MacMillanH. L.Scott-StoreyK.MantlerT.HegartyK.PerrinN. (2016). Development of a brief measure of intimate partner violence experiences: The composite abuse scale (revised)-short form (CASR-SF). BMJ Open, 6(12), e012824. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012824
16.
GarbinC. A.DiasI. d.RovidaT. A.GarbinA. J. (2015). Challenges facing health professionals in the notification of violence: Mandatory implementation and follow-up procedures. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 20(6), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015206.13442014
17.
Garcia-MorenoC.JansenH. A.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. H.; Team, W. H. O. M. S. on W. H., & against Women Study, D. V. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8
18.
GattegnoM. v.WilkinsJ. D.EvansD. P. (2016). The relationship between the Maria da Penha law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0428-3
19.
HasselmannM. H.ReichenheimM. E. (2003). Adaptação transcultural da versão em português da Conflict Tactics Scales Form R (CTS-1), usada para aferir violência no casal: Equivalências semântica e de mensuração. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 19(4), 1083–1093. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2003000400030
20.
HegartyK.BushR.SheehanM. (2005). The composite abuse scale: Further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence and Victims, 20(5), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.2005.20.5.529
21.
HegartyK.SheehanM.SchonfeldC. (1999). A multidimensional definition of partner abuse: Development and preliminary validation of the composite abuse scale. Journal of Family Violence, 14(4), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022834215681
22.
HegartyK.ValpiedJ. (2013). Composite abuse scale manual. Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne.
KwarambaT.YeJ. J.ElahiC.LunyeraJ.OliveiraA. C.CalvoP. R. S.deAndradeL.VissociJ. R. N.StatonC. A. (2019). Lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in an urban Brazilian city: A cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE, 14(11), e0224204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224204
25.
LiamputtongP. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Oxford University Press.
26.
LoxtonD.PowersJ.FitzgeraldD.ForderP.AndersonA.TaftA.HegartyK. (2013). The community composite abuse scale: Reliability and validity of a measure of intimate partner violence in a community survey from the ALSWH. J Womens Health, Issues Care, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9795.1000115
27.
MacMillanH. L.WathenC. N.JamiesonE.BoyleM.McNuttL.WorsterA.LentB., & WebbM. (2006). Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings. Jama, 296(5), 530. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.5.530
28.
MandersO.Xavier HallC.VertamattiM.EvansD.CampbellJ. (2022). “We need to use words that we’d use in Brazil, right?” A community-based content validation of a translated femicide risk assessment instrument. Violence Against Women, 28(11), 2889–2908. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211051397
29.
MinayoM. C. d. S.AssisS. G.SouzaE. R. (2005). Avaliação por triangulação de métodos: Abordagem de programas sociais [Evaluation by triangulation of methods: Social programs approach]. Fiocruz.
PhillippiJ.LauderdaleJ. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
32.
RaftopoulosM.MorleyJ. (2020). Ecocide in the Amazon: The contested politics of environmental rights in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(10), 1616–1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1746648
33.
ReichenheimM. E.MoraesC. L.HasselmannM. H. (2000). Equivalência semântica da versão em português do instrumento Abuse Assessment Screen para rastrear a violência contra a mulher grávida. Revista de Saúde Pública, 34(6), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102000000600008
34.
RochaR. W. G.OliveiraD. C.LiebelV. A.PalluP.HegartyK.SignorelliM. C. (2022). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the composite abuse scale into Brazilian Portuguese. Revista de Saúde Pública, 56(98), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004196
35.
RochaR. W. G.OliveiraD. C.LiebelV. A.PalluP.HegartyK. L.SignorelliM. C. (2021). Protocol for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a questionnaire: The composite abuse scale (CAS) into Brazilian Portuguese. Violence Against Women, 28(5), 1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211013901
36.
SantosK. d. S.RibeiroM. C.de QueirogaD. E. U.da SilvaI. A. P.FerreiraS. M. S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 25(2), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018
37.
SchraiberL. B.D’OliveiraA. F.França-JuniorI.DinizS.PortellaA. P.LudermirA. B.ValençaO.CoutoM. T. (2007). Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in regions of Brazil. Revista de Saude Publica, 41(5), 797–807. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923901
38.
SchraiberL. B.LatorreM. d. R. D. O.França JrI.SegriN. J.D’OliveiraA. F. P. L. (2010). Validade do instrumento WHO VAW STUDY para estimar violência de gênero contra a mulher. Revista de Saúde Pública, 44(4), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000400009
39.
SignorelliM.TaftA.GartlandD.HookerL.McKeeC.MacMillanH.BrownS.HegartyK. (2022). How valid is the question of fear of a partner in identifying intimate partner abuse? A cross-sectional analysis of four studies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), 2535–2556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934439
40.
SignorelliM. C.de SouzaF. G.Pinheiro JuniorR. V. B.ValenteJ.AndreoniS.RezendeL. F. M. d.SanchezZ. V. D. M. (2023a). Panorama of intimate partner violence against women in Brazil and its association with self-perception of health: Findings from a national representative survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13–14), 8453–8475. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231155141
41.
SignorelliM. C.SilvaV. L. C.PradoS. M.EvansD. P.GlassN. (2023b). Feasibility of an online-based safety decision aid for Brazilian women living with intimate partner violence: Findings from participatory-action research in a one stop center. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00409-2
42.
SundborgE.TörnkvistL.WändellP.Saleh-StattinN. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation of an intimate partner violence questionnaire. Clinical Nursing Research, 21(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773812436374
ThompsonM. P.BasileK. C.HertzM. F.SitterleD. (2006). Measuring intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration: A compendium of assessment tool. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11402
45.
VargasJ. H. C. (2005). Genocide in the African diaspora: United States, Brazil, and the need for a holistic research and political method. Cultural Dynamics, 17(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374005061991
46.
VelosoM. M.MagalhãesC. M.Dell'AglioD. D.CabralI. R.GomesM. M. (2013). Notification of violence as a strategy for health surveillance: Profile of a metropolis in Brazil. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 18(5), 1263–1272. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000500011
47.
VergneC. d. M.VilhenaJ. d.ZamoraM. H.RosaC. M. (2015). A palavra é … genocídio: A continuidade de práticas racistas no Brasil. Psicologia & Sociedade, 27(3), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-03102015v27n3p516
WHO. (2016). Ethical and safety recommendations for intervention research on violence against women: Building on lessons from the WHO publication “Putting women first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women”. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/251759/9789241510189-eng.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
