Case files can show how aggressors use different explanations to reduce the seriousness of their crime. We aimed to identify and categorize a 2016 Brazilian case file from a perpetrator of femicide, based on moral disengagement theory. Content analysis yielded 47 verbalized excerpts, with 70 disengagement occurrences. The most frequently used mechanisms throughout the aggressor's speeches consisted of moral justification and blaming the victim herself. Results indicated that he reduced the seriousness of the femicide and sought reduction of the consequences. We discuss how speeches in criminal cases can serve as a secondary source for producing data on violence.
AlexandraV. (2019). The role of social worldviews and self-control in moral disengagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 143(2019), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.012
2.
AndradeL. V. R.Matos AlmeidaM. M. (2017). A criminalização da violência contra as mulheres no Brasil: De “legítima defesa da honra” à violação dos direitos humanos [The criminalization of violence against women in Brazil: From “legitimate defense of honor” to the violation of human rights]. Revista Sociais e Humanas, 30(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5902/2317175827565
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications (vol. 1, pp. 45–96). Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
6.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
7.
BanduraA. (2004). The role of selective moral disengagement in terrorism and counterterrorism. In MogahaddamF. M.MarsellaA. J. (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychological roots, consequences and interventions (pp. 121–150). American Psychological Association.
8.
BanduraA. (2015). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers.
9.
BanduraA. (2016). Manual de modos de codificação do desengajamento moral [Manual of coding modes of moral disengagement]. In BanduraA.AzziR. G.TognettaL. R. P. (Eds.), Desengajamento moral: Teoria e pesquisa a partir da teoria social cognitiva (pp. 173–192). Mercado de Letras.
10.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
11.
BeirasA.BenevuttiM. P.ToneliM. J. F.CavalerC. M. (2020). Narrativas que naturalizam violências: Reflexões a partir de entrevistas com homens sobre violência de gênero [Narratives that naturalize violences: Reflections from interviews with men about gender violence]. INTERthessis, 17, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2020.e72407
12.
BeirasA.NascimentoM.IncrocciC. (2019). Programs for men who have used violence against women: An overview of interventions in Brazil. Saúde e Sociedade, 28(1), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902019170995
13.
BelknapJ.LarsonD.-L.AbramsM. L.GarciaC.Anderson-BlockK. (2012). Types of intimate partner homicides committed by women. Homicide Studies, 16(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767912461444V
14.
BenderA. K. (2017). Ethics, methods, and measures in intimate partner violence research: The current state of the field. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1382–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216658977
15.
BorgesL. S.AlencarH. M. D. (2009). Moralidade e homicídio: Um estudo sobre a ação do transgressor [morality and homicide: A study about the transgressor’s action]. Paidéia, 19(44), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2009000300003
16.
BrownridgeD. A.ChanK. L.Hiebert-MurphyD.RistockJ.TiwariA.LeungW. C.SantosS. C. (2008). The elevated risk for non-lethal post-separation violence in Canada: A comparison of separated, divorced, and married women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507307914
17.
BryantA. (2014). The grounded theory method. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 116–136). Oxford University Press.
18.
CampbellA.MuncerS. (1987). Models of anger and aggression in the social talk of women and men. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17(4), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1987.tb00110.x
19.
CampbellJ. C. (1992). If I can’t have you, no one can: Power and control in homicide of female partners. In RadfordJ.RussellD. E. H. (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman killing (pp. 1–29). Twayne.
20.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC.CampbellD.CurryM. A.GaryF.GlassN., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., Wilt, S. A., Manganello, J., Xu, X., Schollenberger, J., Frye, V., & Laughon, K. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93(7), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089
21.
CamposC. J. G. (2004). Método de análise de conteúdo: Ferramenta para a análise de dados qualitativos no campo da saúde [content analysis: A qualitative data analysis tool in health care]. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 57(5), 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672004000500019
22.
CamposC. J. G.TuratoE. R. (2009). Content analysis in studies using the clinical–qualitative method: Application and perspectives. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 17(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692009000200019
23.
ChughD.KernM. C.ZhuZ.LeeS. (2014). Withstanding moral disengagement: Attachment security as an ethical intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51(2014), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.005
24.
CorradiC.Marcuello-ServósC.BoiraS.WeilS. (2016). Theories of femicide and their significance for social research. Current Sociology, 64(7), 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115622256
25.
CostaN.GomesH.AlmeidaT.PinheiroR. S.AlmeidaC.GondimL.SilvaM.CamposR. S.SilvaS. M.LimaV. (2016). Violence against women: Can “jealousy” mitigate the significance of violence?Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 33(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752016000300015
26.
CuriaB. G.GonçalvesV. D.ZamoraJ. C.RuosoA.LigórioI. S.HabigzangL. (2020). Produções científicas brasileiras em psicologia sobre violência contra mulher por parceiro íntimo [Brazilian scientific productions in psychology on violence against women by intimate partner]. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 40(e189184), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703003189184
DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.SweitzerV. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374
29.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.StillmanT. F.GailliotM. T. (2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.005
30.
DeWallC. N.LynchK. R.RenzettiC. M. (2017). Love and hurt: Why we aggress against loved ones. In B. J. Bushman (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology. Aggression and violence: A social psychological perspective (pp. 259–274). Routledge.
31.
Di MarcoM. H. (2018). Life stories of men who have committed homicide in Buenos Aires, Argentina. European Journal of Public Health, 28(4), cky214.033. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky214.033
32.
Di MarcoM. H.EvansD. P. (2020). Society, her or me? An explanatory model of intimate femicide among male perpetrators in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Feminist Criminology, 15(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085120964572
33.
DobashR. E.DobashR. D. (2017). When women are murdered. In BrookmanF.MaguireE. R.MaguireM. (Eds.), The handbook of homicide (pp. 131–148). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924501.ch8
34.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (2011). What were they thinking? Men who murder an intimate partner. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210391219
35.
D’UrsoG.PetruccelliI.GrilliS.PaceU. (2019). Risk factors related to cognitive distortions toward women and moral disengagement: A study on sex offenders. Sexuality & Culture, 23(2), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9572-9
36.
FerreiraL. B.Bonfá-AraujoB. (2021). “Aggression and violence: A social psychological perspective”: Uma resenha [“Aggression and violence: A social psychological perspective”: A review]. Estudos & Pesquisas em Psicologia, 21(3).
37.
FosheeV. A.BaumanK. E.EnnettS. T.SuchindranC.BenefieldT.LinderG. F. (2005). Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program “Safe Dates” using random coefficient regression modeling. Prevention Science, 6(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0
38.
HayesB. E.MillsC. E.FreilichJ. D.ChermakS. M. (2017). Are honor killings unique? A comparison of honor killings, domestic violence homicides, and hate homicides by far-right extremists. Homicide Studies, 22(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767917736796
39.
HearnJ. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279069
40.
HochdornA.FaleirosV. P.CamargoB. V.CottoneP. F. (2016). Talking gender: How (con)text shapes gender–The discursive positioning of transgender people in prison, work and private settings. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(3–4), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1222923
41.
IglesiasF. (2008). Desengajamento moral [moral disengagement]. In BanduraA.AzziR. G.PolydoroS. (Eds.), Teoria social cognitiva: Conceitos básicos (pp. 165–176). Artmed.
Law n° 11.340, August 7th of 2006 [Lei n° 11.340, de 7 de agosto de 2006]. (2006). Cria mecanismos para coibir a violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, nos termos do § 8° do art. 226 da Constituição Federal, da Convenção sobre a Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação contra as Mulheres e da Convenção Interamericana para Prevenir, Punir e Erradicar a Violência contra a Mulher; dispõe sobre a criação dos Juizados de Violência Doméstica e Familiar contra a Mulher; altera o Código de Processo Penal, o Código Penal e a Lei de Execução Penal; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, 8 ago. 2006. Retrieved July 19, 2021, fromhttp://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11340.htm
45.
Law n° 13.104, March 9th of 2015 [Lei n° 13.104, de 9 de março de 2015]. (2015). Altera o art. 121 do Decreto-Lei n° 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 - Código Penal, para prever o feminicídio como circunstância qualificadora do crime de homicídio, e o art. 1° da Lei n° 8.072, de 25 de julho de 1990, para incluir o feminicídio no rol dos crimes hediondos. Diário Oficial da União, 10 mar. 2015. Retrieved July 19, 2021, fromhttp://www.planalto.gov.br/CCIVIL_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Lei/L13104.htm
46.
MedeirosC. R. D. O.SilveiraR. A. D.OliveiraL. B. D. (2018). Mitos no desengajamento moral: Retóricas da samarco em um crime corporativo [Myths on moral disengagement: Rhetoric from samarco in a corporate crime]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018160310
47.
MeneghelS. N.RosaB. A. R.CecconR. F.HirakataV. N.DanileviczI. M. (2017). Femicides: A study in Brazilian state capital cities and large municipalities. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 22(9), 2963–2970. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017229.22732015
NothaftR. J.BeirasA. (2019). What do we know about interventions with perpetrators of domestic and family violence?Revista Estudos Feministas, 27(3), e56070. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2019v27n356070
51.
OliveiraF. L.SilvaV. F. (2005). Processos judiciais como fonte de dados: Poder e interpretação [Lawsuits as data source: Power and interpretation]. Sociologias, 13(2005), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222005000100010
52.
OsofskyM. J.BanduraA.ZimbardoP. (2005). The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-4930-1
53.
PageT. E.PinaA. (2018). Moral disengagement and self-reported harassment proclivity in men: The mediating effects of moral judgment and emotions. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2018.1440089
54.
Rodriguez-MosqueraP.MansteadA. S.FischerA. H. (2002). The role of honour concerns in emotional reactions to offences. Cognition & Emotion, 16(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000167
55.
SaucierD. A.McManusJ. L. (2014). Men of honor: Examining individual differences in masculine honor beliefs. In J. Gelfer (Ed.), Masculinities in a global era (pp. 85–100). Springer.
56.
SerranG.FirestoneP. (2004). Intimate partner homicide: A review of the male proprietariness and the self-defense theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00107-6
57.
ShalviS.GinoF.BarkanR.AyalS. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414553264
58.
ShuL. L.GinoF.BazermanM. H. (2011). Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398138
59.
SilvaC. B. P.de OliveiraW. A.da SilvaJ. L.SilvaM. A. I. (2020). Bullying homofóbico e desengajamento moral: Quando a justificativa moral e a culpabilização dizem “presente” [Homophobic bullying and moral disengagement: When moral justification and guilty say “present”]. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 15(4), 2066–2077. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v15i4.13898
60.
StratmoenE.GreerM. M.MartensA. L.SaucierD. A. (2018). What, I′m not good enough for you? Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs and the endorsement of aggressive responses to romantic rejection. Personality and Individual Differences, 123(2018), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.018
61.
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
62.
TaylorA.LauroG.Murphy-GrahamE.PachecoT.Pacheco MontoyaD.AraújoD. (2017). Adolescent relationship violence in Brazil and Honduras. Promundo and InterAmerican Development Bank.
63.
TuratoE. R. (2011). Clarificando para o empreendimento da pesquisa clínico-qualitativa [Clarifying the clinical-qualitative research]. In E. R. Turato (Ed.), Tratado da metodologia da pesquisa clínico-qualitativa: Construção teórico-epistemológica, discussão comparada e aplicação nas áreas da saúde e humanas (pp. 245–303). Vozes.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
WenzelM.WoodyattL.McLeanB. (2020). The effects of moral/social identity threats and affirmations on psychological defensiveness following wrongdoing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 1062–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12378
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
