Young Women Subjected to Nonconsensual Condom Removal: Prevalence,Risk Factors,and Sexual Self-Perceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate nonconsensual condom removal (NCCR), also termed “stealthing,” which involves a male partner removing a condom during sex without knowledge or consent. Young women (N = 364) provided self-report data on sociodemographic characteristics, NCCR experiences, and sexual self-perceptions. Almost 10% of the participants reported experiencing NCCR, with increased risk linked to nonheterosexuality, nonexclusive relationship status, and more sexual partners. Women with NCCR histories reported less confidence to refuse unwanted sexual advances and felt less in control of themselves as sexual beings. Together, the findings suggested NCCR is a somewhat common sexual risk behavior which may pose acute and sustained psychosexual harm to victims.

Keywords

nonconsensual condom removal stealthing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

B. L.

Cyranowski

J. M.

(1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079–1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1079

Arnett

J. J.

(2011). New horizons in research on emerging and young adulthood. In Booth

Brown

Landale

Manning

McHale

(Eds.), Early adulthood in a family context. National symposium on family issues (pp. 231–244). Springer.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia 2018.

Beasley

Schumacker

R. E.

(1995). Multiple regression approach to analysing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 79–93. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1005.9943797

Boeschen

L. A.

Koss

M. P.

Figueredo

A. J.

Coan

J. A.

(2001). Experiential avoidance and post-traumatic stress disorder: A cognitive mediational model of rape recovery. In Freyd

DePrince

(Eds.), Trauma and cognitive science: A meeting of minds, science, and human experience (pp. 211–245). Psychology Press.

Bonar

E. E.

Ngo

Q. M.

Philyaw-Kotov

M. L.

Walton

M. A.

Kusunoki

(2019). Stealthing perpetration and victimisation: Prevalence and correlates among emerging adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519888519

Brodsky

(2017). “Rape-adjacent”: Imaging legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 32, 183–210.

Buzwell

Rosenthal

(1996). Constructing a sexual self: Sexual self perceptions, sexual styles and sexual risk-taking in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 489–513.

Clough

(2018). Conditional consent and purposeful deception. Journal of Criminal Law, 82, 178–190. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022018319761687

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

11.

Criminal Law Reform Act 2019. (Singapore). https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts-Supp/15-2019/Published/20190604?DocDate=20190604

12.

Curtin

Ward

M. L.

Merriwether

Caruthers

(2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23, 48–62. http://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2010.524694

13.

Czechowski

Courtice

E. L.

Samosh

Davies

Shaughnessy

. (2019). “That’s not what was originally agreed to”: Perceptions, outcomes, and legal contextualization of non-consensual condom removal in a Canadian sample. PLOS ONE, 14, Article e0219297. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219297

14.

Dalgleish

(2004). Cognitive approaches to posttraumatic stress disorder: The evolution of mispresentational theorizing. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 228–260. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.228

15.

Davis

K. C.

Gulati

N. K.

Neilson

E. C.

Stappenbeck

C. A.

(2018). Men’s coercive condom use resistance: The roles of sexual aggression history, alcohol intoxication, and partner condom negotiation. Violence Against Women, 24, 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218787932

16.

Davis

K. C.

Logan-Greene

(2012). Young men’s use of aggressive tactics to avoid condom use: A test of a theoretical model. Social Work Research, 36, 223–231. http://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svs027

17.

Davis

K. C.

Stappenbeck

C. A.

Masters

N. T.

George

W. H.

(2019). Young women’s experiences with coercive and noncoercive condom use resistance: Examination of an understudied sexual risk behavior. Women’s Health Issues, 29, 231–237. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.01.005

18.

Dawson

S. J.

Huberman

J. S.

Bouchard

K. N.

McInnis

M. K.

Pukall

C. F.

Chivers

M. L.

(2019). Effects of individual difference variables, gender, and exclusivity of sexual attraction on volunteer bias in sexuality research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2403–2417. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1451-4

19.

Dijksta

M. T.

Homan

A. C.

(2016). Engaging in rather than disengaging from stress: Effective coping and perceived control. Frontiers in Psychology, 21, Article 1415. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01415

20.

Ebrahim

(2019). I’m not sure this is rape, but: An exposition of the stealthing trend. Reproductive Health in Sub-Saharan Africa, 9, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019842201

21.

Field

(2018). Discovering statistics using IMB SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

22.

Flack

W. F.

Jr. Caron

M. L.

Leinen

Breitenbach

K. G.

Barber

A. M.

Brown

E. N.

, et al. (2008). “The red zone”: Temporal risk for unwanted sex among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1177–1196. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508314308

23.

Flack

W. F.

Jr. Hansen

B. E.

Hopper

A. B.

Bryant

L. A.

Lang

K. W.

Massa

A. A.

Whalen

J. E.

(2016). Some types of hookups may be riskier than others for campus sexual assault. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8, 413–420. http://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000090

24.

Janoff-Bulman

Frieze

I. H.

(1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00138.x

25.

Katsampes

(2017). A rape by any other name: The problem of defining acts of protection deception and the university as a solution. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 23, 157–194.

26.

Katz

Schneider

M. E.

(2015). (Hetero)sexual compliance with unwanted casual sex: Associations with feelings about first sex and sexual self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 72, 451–461. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0467-z

27.

Kelley

E. L.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2015). Differential relationships between childhood and adolescent sexual victimisation and cognitive-affective sexual appraisals. Psychology of Violence, 5, 144–153. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038854

28.

Keshet

Gilboa-Schechtman

(2017). Symptoms and beyond: Self-concept among sexually assaulted women. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9, 545–552. http://doi/org/10.1037/tra0000222

29.

Kilimnik

C. D.

Boyd

Stanton

A. M.

Meston

C. M.

(2018). Identification of nonconsensual sexual experiences and the sexual self-schemas of women: Implications for sexual functioning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1633–1647. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1229-0

30.

Krahe

Berger

(2017). Longitudinal pathways of sexual victimization, sexual self-esteem, and depression in women and men. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 9, 147–155. http://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000198

31.

Larcombe

(2011). Falling rape conviction rates: (Some) feminist aims and measures of rape law. Feminist Legal Studies, 19, 27–45. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-011-9169-2

32.

Latimer

R. L.

Vodstrcil

L. A.

Fairley

C. K.

Cornelisse

V. J.

Chow

E. P.

Read

T. R.

Bradshaw

C. S.

(2018). Non-consensual condom removal, reported by patients at a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia. PLOS ONE, 13, Article e0209779. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209779

33.

Lévesque

Rousseau

(2019). Young women’s acknowledgment of reproductive coercion: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842169

34.

Measor

(2006). Condom use: A culture of resistance. Sex Education, 6, 393–402. http://doi.org/10.1080/14681810600982093

35.

Mellins

C. A.

Walsh

Sarvet

A. L.

Wall

Gilbert

Santeli

J. S.

, et al. (2017). Sexual assault incidences among college undergraduates: Prevalence and factors associated with risk. PLOS ONE, 12, Article e0186471. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186471

36.

Mengesha

Z. B.

Dune

T. M.

Perz

J. M.

(2016). Culturally and linguistically diverse women’s views and experiences of accessing sexual and reproductive health care in Australia: A systematic review. Sexual Health, 13, 299–310. http://doi.org/10.1071/SH15235

37.

Paat

Y. F.

Markham

C. M.

(2016). Young women’s sexual involvement in emerging adulthood. Social Work in Health Care, 55, 559–579. http://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2016.1199454

38.

Rosenthal

Moore

Flynn

(1991). Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1, 77–88. http://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450010203

39.

Rostosky

S. S.

Dekhtyar

Cupp

P. K.

Anderman

E. M.

(2008). Sexual self-concept and sexual self-efficacy in adolescents: A possible clue to promoting sexual health? Journal of Sex Research, 45, 277–286. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802204480

40.

Rothman

E. F.

Exner

Baughman

(2011). The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: A systematic review. Trauma Violence, & Abuse, 12, 55–66. http://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010390707

41.

Scott

K. D.

Graves

(2017). Sexual violence, consent, and contradictions: A call for communication scholars to impact sexual violence prevention. Pursuit—The Journal of Undergraduate Research at the University of Tennessee, 8, 169–174.

42.

Stanton

A. M.

Boyd

R. L.

Pulverman

Meston

C. M.

(2015). Determining women’s sexual self-schemas through advanced computerized text analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 46, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.003

43.

Stover

Rosen

J. E.

Carvalho

M. N.

Korenromp

E. L.

Friedman

H. S.

Cogan

Deperthes

(2017). The case for investing in the male condom. PLOS ONE, 12, Article e0177108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177108

44.

Tomsen

(2013). Homophobic violence and masculinities in Australia. In Magaraggia

Cherubini

(Eds.), Men against women: The roots of male violence (pp. 77–102). UTET University.

45.

Van Bruggen

L. K.

Runtz

M. G.

Kadlex

. (2006). Sexual revictimization: The role of sexual self-esteem and dysfunctional sexual behaviors. Child Maltreament, 11, 131–145. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077559505285780

46.

VanderDrift

L. E.

Agnew

C. R.

Harvey

S. M.

Warren

T. J.

(2013). Whose intentions predict? Power over condom use within heterosexual dyads. Health Psychology, 32, 1038–1046. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0030021

47.

Wilson

Shalley

(2018). Estimates of Australia’s non-heterosexual population. Australian Population Studies, 2, 26–38. http://www.australianpopulationstudies.org/index.php/aps/article/view/23

48.

Yeater

E. A.

McFall

R. M.

Viken

R. J.

(2011). The relationship between women’s response effectiveness and a history of sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 462–478. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510363425

49.

Zeanah

P. D.

Schwarz

J. C.

(1996). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Self-Esteem Inventory-Women. Assessment, 3, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1177/107319119600300101