Effects of Historical Coercive Control,Historical Violence,and Lawyer Representation on Post-Separation Male Partner Violence Against Mother Litigants Who Participated in Adversarial Family Court Proceedings
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2021
Effects of Historical Coercive Control,Historical Violence,and Lawyer Representation on Post-Separation Male Partner Violence Against Mother Litigants Who Participated in Adversarial Family Court Proceedings
The primary objective of this study was to test the effects of historical male partner violence and lawyer representation on post-separation male partner violence and coercive control against mother litigants participating in adversarial family court proceedings. Toward this end, staff at two women’s shelters administered a questionnaire to 40 former residents who met the sample selection criteria. Two findings are noteworthy. First, there was a decrease in mother litigant reports of post-separation physical violence requiring a visit to a hospital. Second, post-separation male partner coercive control “most/some of the time” was reported by 97.5% of all 40 separated mother litigants who also reported experiencing historical coercive control by their male partners. Recommendations and limitations are described in the final two pages.
AndersonK. L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15, 1444–1457.
2.
ArnoldG. (2009). A battered women’s movement perspective of coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15, 1432–1443.
3.
BeckC. J.RaghavanC. (2010). Intimate partner abuse screening in custody mediation: The importance of assessing coercive control. Family Court Review, 48, 555–565.
4.
BeckC. J.SalesB. D. (2001). Family mediation: Facts, myths and prospects. American Psychological Association.
5.
BemillerM. (2008). When battered mothers lose custody: A qualitative study of abuse at home and in the courts. Journal of Child Psychology, 5, 228–255.
6.
BerkR. A.NewtonP. J.Fenstmaker-BerkS. (1986). What a difference a day makes: An empirical study of the impact of shelters on battered women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 481–488.
7.
BlockC. (2000). The Chicago women’s health risk study of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaboratice research project. National Institute of Justice, Office of Research Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
BrowneA.WilliamsK. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 through 1987. Gender & Society, 7, 78–98.
9.
CampbellJ.WebsterD.GlassN. (2009). The danger assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 653–674.
10.
Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women. (1993). Changing the landscape: Ending the violence–achieving equality. Supply and Services.
11.
CohenJ.GershbainN. (2001). For the sake of fathers? Child custody reform and the perils of maximum contact. Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 19, 121–200.
12.
CrossP. (2012, September). It shouldn’t be this hard: A gender-based analysis of family law, family court and violence against women [Report]. Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre for Women and Children. http://lukesplace.ca/pdf/It_Shouldnt_Be_This_Hard.pdf
13.
CrossmanK. A.HardestyJ. L.RaffaelliM. (2016). He could scare me without laying a hand on me: Mothers’ experiences of non-violent coercive control during marriage and after separation. Violence Against Women, 22, 454–473.
DrewM. (2005). Lawyer malpractice and domestic violence: Are we revictimizing our victims?Family Law Quarterly, 39, 7–25.
16.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Coercive control in intimate partner violence: Towards a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743–757.
17.
EhrensaftM. K.MoffittT. E.CaspiA. (2004). Clinically abusive relationships in an unelected birth cohort: Men’s and women’s participation and development antecedents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 258–270.
EllisD. (2019). Preventing the violent victimization of mother litigants participating in contested custody and access proceedings. Department of Justice, Canada.
21.
EllisD.StucklessN.SmithC. (2015). Marital separation and lethal domestic violence. Routledge.
22.
FarmerA.TiefenthalerJ. (2003). Explaining the decline in domestic violence. Contemporary Economic Policy, 21, 158–172.
23.
FieldC. A.CaetanoR. (2005). Longitudinal model predicting mutual partner violence among White, Black and Hispanic couples in the United States general population. Violence and Victims, 20, 499–450.
24.
Government of Ontario. (2006). Children’s Law Reform Act.
25.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2008). Does controlling behavior predict physical aggression and violence between partners?Journal of Family Violence, 23, 539–548.
26.
HannaC. (2009). The paradox of progress: Translating Evan Stark’s coercive control into legal doctrine for abused women. Violence Against Women, 15, 1458–1476.
27.
Hannafort-AgorP.MottN. (2003). Research on self-represented litigation: Preliminary results and methodological considerations. Justice System Journal, 24, 163–181.
28.
HardestyJ. L.CrossmanK. A.HaselschwerdtM. L.RafaelliM.OgolskyB. G.JohnsonM. (2015). Towards a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violent types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 833–843.
29.
HardestyJ. L.GanongI. H. (2006). A grounded theory model of how women make custody decisions and manage co-parenting with abusive former husbands. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 2, 543–563.
30.
HarrellA.SmithB. E. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In BuzawaE.BuzawaC.G. (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 214–242). Sage.
31.
HarrisonC. (2008). Implacably hostile or appropriately protective? Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 381–405.
32.
HesterM.JonesC.WilliamsonE.FahmyE.FederG. (2017). Is it coercive controlling violence? A cross-sectional domestic violence and abuse survey of men attending general practice in England. Psychology of Violence, 7, 417–427.
33.
HoltV.KernickM. A.WolfM. E.RivaraF. P. (2003). Do protection orders effect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 16–21.
34.
HumphreysC.ThiaraR. (2002). Routes to safety: Protection issues facing abused women and children and the role of outreach services. Women’s Aid.
35.
JordanC. E.PritchardA.DuckettD.CharnigoR. (2010). Criminal responding among respondents to protective orders: Crime types and patterns that predict victim risk. Violence Against Women, 16, 1396–1411.
36.
KaciJ. H. (1994). Aftermath of seeking domestic violence protection orders: The victim perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 10, 204–219.
37.
KayeM.StubbsJ.TolmieJ. (2003, June). Negotiating child residence and contact arrangements against a background of domestic violence [Research Report]. Families, Law and Social Policy Unit, Socio-Legal Research Centre.
38.
KeilitzS. L. (1997). Domestic violence and child custody disputes: A resource handbook for judges and court managers. National Center for State Courts.
39.
KellyF. (2011). Enforcing a parent-child relationship at all cost? Supervised access order in Canadian courts. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 49, 277–309.
40.
KellyJ. B.JohnsonM. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46, 476–499.
41.
KernickM.Monary-ErnsdorffD.KoepsellJ. K.HoltV. L. (2005). Children in the cross-fire: Custody determination among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11, 991–1021.
42.
KleinA. R. (1996). Re-abuse in a population of court-restrained batterers. In BuzawaE.S.BuzawaC.G. (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 192–213). Sage.
43.
KnowltonA.CornettL.GeretyC. D.DrobinskeJ. (2016, June8). Cases without counsel: Research on experiences of self-representation in U.S. family courts [Report]. Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System.
44.
KothanC.RhodesK. V.WileyJ. A.FinkJ.OverholtS.DichterM. E.MarcusS. C.CeruliC. (2012). Protection orders against assault and injury: A longitudinal study of police-involved women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2845–2868.
45.
KuennenT. L. (2007). Analyzing the impact of coercion on domestic violence victims. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law and Justice, 22, 2–30e.
46.
LarocheD. (2005). Aspects of the consequences of domestic violence: Situational couple violence and intimate terrorism in Canada in 1999. Institut de la Statistique.
47.
LischickC. W. (1999). Divorce in the context of coercive control. In StarkE.BuzawaF. (Eds.), Violence against women in families and relationship (Vol. 2, pp. 191–224). Praeger.
48.
LoganT. K.WalkerR.ShannonL. (2008). Factors associated with separation and on-going violence among women with civil protection orders. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 377–385.
49.
MaccobyE.MnookinR. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of child custody. Harvard University Press.
50.
McFarlaneG. J.McFarlaneJ.MalechaA.FredlandN.SchultzP.WillsonP. (2001). Women in danger: Intimate partner violence experienced by women who qualify and do not qualify for a protection order. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 637–647.
51.
MonahanJ. (1975). The prediction of violence. In ChappellD.MonahanJ. (Eds.), Violence and criminal justice (pp. 15–32). D. C. Heath.
52.
MurphyE.GarveyN.TolmieJ. (2012). Gendered dynamics of power in disputes over the post-separation care of children. Violence Against Women, 8, 459–448.
53.
MurphyJ. (1993). Engaging with the state: The growing reliance on lawyers and judges to protect battered women. Journal of Gender and Social Policy, 11, 499–522.
54.
OrnsteinP.RickneJ. (2013). When does intimate partner violence continue after separation?Violence Against Women, 19, 617–633.
55.
PollemaL. (2007). Beyond the bounds of zealous advocacy: The prevalence of abusive legislation in family law and the need for tort remedies. University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review, 75, 1107–1138.
56.
PtacekJ. (1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. Northeastern University Press.
57.
RaftusZ. (2013). Shifting language and meanings between social science and the law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36, 359–389.
58.
RichardsL. (2009). Domestic abuse, stalking, harassment and honor based violence (DASH, 2009) risk identification and assessment and management model. Association of Police Officers (ACPO); Coordinated Action Against Domestic Abuse (CAADA).
59.
RiveraE.SullivanC. M.ZeoliA. M. (2012). Secondary victimization of abused mothers by family court mediators. Feminist Criminology, 7, 234–252.
60.
RoggeR. D.BradburyR. N. (1999). Til violence do us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes . Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 67, 340–351.
61.
Sharp-JeffsN.KellyL.KleinR. (2018). Long journeys toward freedom: The relationship between coercive control and space for action-measurement and emerging evidence. Violence Against Women, 24, 163–185.
62.
SonisJ.LangerM. (2008). Risk and protective factors for recurrent intimate partner violence in a cohort of low-income inner-city women. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 529–538.
63.
StarkE. (1995). Re-presenting woman battering: From battered woman syndrome to coercive control. Albany Law Review, 58, 973–1026.
64.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
TanhaM.BeckC. J.FigueredoA. J.RaghavanC. (2010). Sex differences in intimate partners violence and the use of coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1836–1854.
67.
TarkJ.KleckG.Roe-SepowitzG. (2008). Crime victimization and divorce. International Review of Victimology, 15, 1–17.
68.
TarrN. W. (2003). Civil orders for protection: Freedom or entrapment. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 11, 157–192.
69.
TolmieJ. R. (2018). Coercive control: To criminalize or not to criminalize?Criminology and Criminal Justice, 18, 50–66.
WalkerR.LoganT. K.JordanC. E.CampbellJ. C. (2004). An integrative review of separation in the context of victimization: Consequences and implications for women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 143–193.
72.
WatsonL. B.AncisJ. R. (2013). Power and control in the legal system: From marriage/relationships to divorce and custody. Violence Against Women, 19, 166–186.
73.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1994). Spousal homicide. Juristat Service Bulletin, 14, 1–14.
