Brush and Miller have provided an astute critique of “gender-transformative” antiviolence programming, encouraging us to take more seriously the effects of history, gender, and social structure. In this commentary, we extend their analysis in four directions by highlighting the everydayness of gendered violence, the relationship between masculinity and social legibility, the seductive rewards of masculine conformity, and the way norms are enforced through nets of accountability. We elaborate on the model provided by women’s empowerment self-defense training to suggest a potential way forward for these programs.
CookK. J. (2006). Doing difference and accountability in restorative justice conferences. Theoretical Criminology, 10, 107-124.
4.
CorbettK. (2001). Faggot = loser. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 2, 3-28.
5.
DworkinA. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Perigee.
6.
HeritageJ. (1983). Accounts in action. In GilbertG. N.AbellP. (Eds.), Accounts and action (pp. 117-131). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
7.
HollanderJ. A. (2001). Vulnerability and dangerousness: The construction of gender through conversation about violence. Gender & Society, 15, 83-109.
8.
HollanderJ. A. (2013). “I demand more of people”: Accountability, interaction, and gender change. Gender & Society, 27, 5-29.
9.
HollanderJ. A. (2018). Interactional accountability. In RismanB. J.FroyumC.ScarboroughW. J. (Eds.), The handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 173-184). New York: Springer.
10.
HongJ. S.EspelageD. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 311-322.
11.
JacksonS. (1998). Heterosexuality and feminist theory. In RichardsonD. (Ed.), Theorising heterosexuality (pp. 21-38). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12.
KehilyM. J.NayakA. (1997). “Lads and laughter”: Humour and the production of heterosexual masculinities. Gender and Education, 9, 69-87.
13.
LehneG. (1998). Homophobia among men: Supporting and defining the male role. In KimmelM.MessnerM. (Eds.), Men’s lives (pp. 237-249). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
MacKinnonC. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
MajorsR.BillsonJ. M. (1993). Cool pose: The dilemma of Black manhood in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
McCaugheyM. (1997). Real knockouts: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University Press.
17.
McCormackM. (2012). The declining significance of homophobia: How teenage boys are redefining masculinity and heterosexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
MehanH.WoodH. (1975). The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley.
19.
MunschC. L.GruysK. (2018). What threatens, defines: Tracing the symbolic boundaries of contemporary masculinity. Sex Roles, 79, 375-392.
20.
MunschC. L.WillerR. (2012). The role of gender identity threat in perceptions of date rape and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 18, 1125-1146.
21.
PascoeC. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.
23.
SchwalbeM. (2005). Identity stakes, manhood acts, and the dynamics of accountability. Studies in Symbolic Intraction, 28, 65-81.
24.
SchwalbeM. (2016). Overcoming aprocessual bias in the study of inequality: Parsing the capitalist interaction order. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 46, 95-122.
25.
SchwalbeM.GodwinS.HoldenD.SchrockD.ThompsonS.WolkomirM. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419-452.
26.
SchwalbeM.ShayH. (2014). Dramaturgy and dominance. In McLeodJ.LawlerE. J.SchwalbeM. (Eds.), Handbook of the social psychology of inequality (pp. 155-180). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
27.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
WillerR.RogalinC. L.ConlonB.WojnowiczM. T. (2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980-1022.
