This article investigates the role of critical masculinity theory on the field of violence against women (VAW). We conduct a meta-analysis to discern which theories of masculinity have been used within the journal Violence Against Women over the past 25 years. This search revealed that many articles use masculinity concepts but do not always articulate explicit theories of masculinity. We review hegemonic masculinity and male peer support, two of the most commonly used theories of masculinity and violence. We then discuss new developments within masculinity scholarship, including theories of manhood acts, inclusive masculinity, and hybrid masculinity, and consider how these perspectives can enhance the already robust scholarship on masculinity and VAW.
AdelmanM. (2003). The military, militarism, and the militarization of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 1118-1152. doi:10.1177/1077801203255292
2.
AgnichL. E.HongJ. S.PegueroA. A. (2017). Gender-based violence in schools. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L.BergenR. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (3rd ed., pp. 159-186). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
3.
AndersonE. (2009). Inclusive masculinity theory. In AndersonE. (Ed.), Inclusive masculinity (pp. 93-101). New York: Routledge.
4.
AndersonK. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 655-669. doi:10.2307/353952
5.
BasileK. C. (2008). Histories of violent victimization among women who reported unwanted sex in marriages and intimate relationships: Findings from a qualitative study. Violence Against Women, 14, 29-52. doi:10.1177/1077801207311857
6.
BasileK. C.HallJ. E.WaltersM. L. (2013). Expanding resource theory and feminist-informed theory to explain intimate partner violence perpetration by court-ordered men. Violence Against Women, 19, 848-880. doi:10.1177/1077801213497105
7.
BoeringerS. B.ShehanC. L.AkersR. L. (1991). Social contexts and social learning in sexual coercion and aggression: Assessing the contribution of fraternity membership. Family Relations, 40, 58-64. doi:10.2307/585659
8.
BridgesT.PascoeC. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8, 246-258.
9.
BuschN. B.BellH.HotalingN.MontoM. A. (2002). Male customers of prostituted women: Exploring perceptions of entitlement to power and control and implications for violent behavior toward women. Violence Against Women, 8, 1093-1112. doi:10.1177/107780102401101755
10.
CahillS. (1989). Fashioning males and females: Appearance management and the social reproduction of gender. Symbolic Interaction, 12, 281-298.
11.
CallahanJ. L. (2009). Manifestations of power and control: Training as the catalyst for scandal at the United States air force academy. Violence Against Women, 15, 1149-1168. doi:10.1177/1077801209344341
12.
CaseyE. A.MastersN. T.BeadnellB.HoppeM. J.MorrisonD. M.WellsE. A. (2017). Predicting sexual assault perpetration among heterosexually active young men. Violence Against Women, 23, 3-27. doi:10.1177/1077801216634467
13.
CaseyE. A.SmithT. (2010). “How can I not?” Men’s pathways to involvement in anti-violence against women work. Violence Against Women, 16, 953-973. doi:10.1177/1077801210376749
14.
CepedaA.NowotnyK. M. (2014). A border context of violence: Mexican female sex workers on the U.S.–Mexico border. Violence Against Women, 20, 1506-1531. doi:10.1177/1077801214557955
15.
ChenP.-H.WhiteH. R. (2004). Gender differences in adolescent and young adult predictors of later intimate partner violence: A prospective study. Violence Against Women, 10, 1283-1301. doi:10.1177/1077801204269000
16.
Chesney-LindM. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women reaction essay. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 81-90.
17.
ChoiY.-P.CheungK.-L.CheungY.-W.DavidR. (2014). Bring the subjective back in: Resource and husband-to-wife physical assault among Chinese couples in Hong Kong. Violence Against Women, 20, 1428-1446. doi:10.1177/1077801214558950
18.
CollinsP.H. (2005). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
19.
CollinsP. H. (2008). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
20.
CondisM. (2018). Gaming masculinity: Trolls, fake geeks, and the gendered battle for online culture. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
21.
ConnellR. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829-859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639
23.
CrooksC. V.GoodallG. R.HughesR.JaffeP. G.BakerL. L. (2007). Engaging men and boys in preventing violence against women: Applying a cognitive-behavioral model. Violence Against Women, 13, 217-239. doi:10.1177/1077801206297336
24.
DallaR. L.MarchettiA. M.SechrestE. A.WhiteJ. L. (2010). “All the men here have the Peter Pan syndrome—They don’t want to grow up”: Navajo adolescent mothers’ intimate partner relationships—A 15-year perspective. Violence Against Women, 16, 743-763. doi:10.1177/1077801210374866
25.
DankwortJ.RauschR. (2000). Men at work to end wife abuse in Quebec: A case study in claims making. Violence Against Women, 6, 936-959. doi:10.1177/10778010022182227
26.
DasguptaS. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389. doi:10.1177/107780102237408
27.
DaviesS. (1996). Women, war, and the violence of history: An Australian perspective. Violence Against Women, 2, 359-377. doi:10.1177/1077801296002004002
28.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2017). Explaining campus violence against women: Unhealthy masculinity and male peer support. In KaukinenC.HughesM.Miller PowersR. (Eds.), Addressing violence against women on college campuses (pp. 65-77). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
29.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (1993). Male peer support and woman abuse: An expansion of DeKeseredy’s model. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 393-413. doi:10.1080/02732173.1993.9982041
30.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (2013). Male peer support and violence against women: The history and verification of a theory. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
31.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (2014). Male peer support theory. In CullenF. T.WilcoxP.LuxJ. L.JonsonC. L. (Eds.), Sisters in crime revisited: Bringing gender into criminology (1st ed., pp. 302-322). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D.AlviS. (2000). The role of profeminist men in dealing with woman abuse on the Canadian college campus. Violence Against Women, 6, 918-935. doi:10.1177/10778010022182218
33.
DemetriouD. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30, 337-361.
34.
DinesG. (1998). King Kong and the white woman: Hustler magazine and the demonization of black masculinity. Violence Against Women, 4, 291-307. doi:10.1177/1077801298004003003
35.
DobashR. E.DobashR. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
36.
DouglasU.BathrickD.PerryP. A. (2008). Deconstructing male violence against women: The men stopping violence community-accountability model. Violence Against Women, 14, 247-261. doi:10.1177/1077801207312637
37.
DragiewiczM.DeKeseredyW. S. (2012). Claims about women’s use of non-fatal force in intimate relationships: A contextual review of Canadian research. Violence Against Women, 18, 1008-1026. doi:10.1177/1077801212460754
38.
EzzellM. B. (2012). “I’m in control”: Compensatory manhood in a therapeutic community. Gender & Society, 26, 190-215.
39.
EzzellM. B. (2016). Healthy for whom?—Males, men, and masculinity: A reflection on the doing (and study) of dominance. In PascoeC. J.BridgesT. (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Identity, inequality, continuity and change (pp. 188-197). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
FidanA.BuiH. N. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women in Zimbabwe. Violence Against Women, 22, 1075-1096. doi:10.1177/1077801215617551
41.
FlakeD. F. (2005). Individual, family, and community risk markers for domestic violence in Peru. Violence Against Women, 11, 353-373. doi:10.1177/1077801204272129
42.
FlemingW. M.Wiersma-MosleyJ. D. (2015). The role of alcohol consumption patterns and pro-social bystander interventions in contexts of gender violence. Violence Against Women, 21, 1259-1283. doi:10.1177/1077801215592721
43.
FloodM. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities, 10, 339-359. doi:10.1177/1097184X06287761
44.
ForbesG. B.Adams-CurtisL. E.PakalkaA. H.WhiteK. B. (2006). Dating aggression, sexual coercion, and aggression-supporting attitudes among college men as a function of participation in aggressive high school sports. Violence Against Women, 12, 441-455. doi:10.1177/1077801206288126
45.
FranklinC. A.MenakerT. A. (2014). Feminism, status inconsistency, and women’s intimate partner victimization in heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 20, 825-845. doi:10.1177/1077801214543385
46.
FríasS. M.AngelR. J. (2012). Beyond borders: Comparative quantitative research on partner violence in the United States and Mexico. Violence Against Women, 18, 5-29. doi:10.1177/1077801212436420
47.
GageE. A. (2008). Gender attitudes and sexual behaviors: Comparing center and marginal athletes and nonathletes in a collegiate setting. Violence Against Women, 14, 1014-1032. doi:10.1177/1077801208321987
48.
GansenH. M. (2017). Reproducing (and disrupting) heteronormativity: Gendered sexual socialization in preschool classrooms. Sociology of Education, 90, 255-272. doi:10.1177/0038040717720981
49.
GidyczC. A.OrchowskiL. M.BerkowitzA. D. (2011). Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17, 720-742. doi:10.1177/1077801211409727
50.
GilbertP. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8, 1271-1300. doi:10.1177/107780102762478019
51.
GillamK.WoodenS. R. (2008). Post-princess models of gender: The new man in Disney/Pixar. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 36, 2-8.
52.
GillumT. L. (2008). The benefits of a culturally specific intimate partner violence intervention for African American survivors. Violence Against Women, 14, 917-943. doi:10.1177/1077801208321982
53.
GillumT. L.DiFulvioG. (2012). “There’s so much at stake”: Sexual minority youth discuss dating violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 725-745. doi:10.1177/1077801212455164
54.
GingD. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22, 638-657. doi:10.1177/1097184X17706401
55.
GiorgioG. (2002). Speaking silence: Definitional dialogues in abusive lesbian relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1233-1259. doi:10.1177/107780120200801005
56.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life (1st ed.). New York: Anchor Books.
57.
GondolfE. W. (2010). The contributions of Ellen Pence to batterer programming. Violence Against Women, 16, 992-1006. doi:10.1177/1077801210379330
58.
Gonzalez-GuardaR. M.VermeeschA. L.Florom-SmithA. L.McCabeB. E.PeragalloN. P. (2013). Birthplace, culture, self-esteem, and intimate partner violence among community-dwelling Hispanic Women. Violence Against Women, 19, 6-23. doi:10.1177/1077801212475336
59.
GoodeW. J. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 624-636. doi:10.2307/349435
60.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
61.
GreenK.Van OortM. (2013). “We wear no pants”: Selling the crisis of masculinity in the 2010 super bowl commercials. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38, 695-719. doi:10.1086/668618
62.
GruberJ.FineranS. (2016). Sexual harassment, bullying, and school outcomes for high school girls and boys. Violence Against Women, 22, 112-133. doi:10.1177/1077801215599079
63.
HamptonR.OliverW.MagarianL. (2003). Domestic violence in the African American community: An analysis of social and structural factors. Violence Against Women, 9, 533-557. doi:10.1177/1077801202250450
64.
HayesR. M.AbbottR. L.CookS. (2016). It’s her fault: Student acceptance of rape myths on two college campuses. Violence Against Women, 22, 1540-1555. doi:10.1177/1077801216630147
65.
HenryN.PowellA. (2015). Embodied harms: Gender, shame and technology facilitated sexual violence in cyberspace. Violence Against Women, 21, 758-779.
66.
HochschildA. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
67.
HunnicuttG. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553-573. doi:10.1177/1077801208331246
68.
KaninE. J. (1967a). An examination of sexual aggression as a response to sexual frustration. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 428-433. doi:10.2307/349577
69.
KaninE. J. (1967b). Reference groups and sex conduct norm violations. Sociological Quarterly, 8, 495-502. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1967.tb01085.x
70.
KanuhaV. K. (2013). “Relationships so loving and so hurtful”: The constructed duality of sexual and racial/ethnic intimacy in the context of violence in Asian and Pacific Islander lesbian and queer women’s relationships. Violence Against Women, 19, 1175-1196. doi:10.1177/1077801213501897
71.
KatzJ.HeisterkampH. A.FlemingW. M. (2011). The social justice roots of the mentors in violence prevention model and its application in a high school setting. Violence Against Women, 17, 684-702. doi:10.1177/1077801211409725
72.
KendallL. (2000). “Oh no! I’m a nerd!” Hegemonic masculinity on an online forum. Gender & Society, 14, 256-274.
73.
KimmelM. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363. doi:10.1177/107780102237407
74.
KimmelM. S. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men (1st Repr. ed.). New York: Harper Perennial.
75.
KimmelM. S. (2012). The gender of desire: Essays on male sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press.
76.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514-551.
77.
MahlstedtD. L.WelshL. A. (2005). Perceived causes of physical assault in heterosexual dating relationships. Violence Against Women, 11, 447-472. doi:10.1177/1077801204273298
78.
MalamuthN. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962.
79.
MalamuthN. (1998). The confluence model as an organizing framework for research on sexually aggressive men: Risk moderators, imagined aggression, and pornography consumption. In GreenR. G.DonnersteinE. (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 229-245). New York: Academic Press.
80.
MartinP. Y. (1998). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Reflections on Connell’s masculinities. Gender & Society, 12, 472-474. doi:10.1177/089124398012004008
81.
MartinP. Y. (2016). The rape prone culture of academic contexts: Fraternities and athletics. Gender & Society, 30, 30-43. doi:10.1177/0891243215612708
82.
MasonR.HymanI.BermanH.GurugeS.KanagaratnamP.ManuelL. (2008). “Violence is an international language”: Tamil women’s perceptions of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 1397-1412. doi:10.1177/1077801208325096
83.
McCormackM.AndersonE. (2014). The influence of declining homophobia on men’s gender in the United States: An argument for the study of homohysteria. Sex Roles, 71, 109-120. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0358-8
84.
McDuie-RaD. (2012). Violence against women in the militarized Indian frontier: Beyond “Indian culture” in the experiences of ethnic minority women. Violence Against Women, 18, 322-345. doi:10.1177/1077801212443114
85.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization of theory (1st ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
86.
MessnerM. A. (1993). “Changing men” and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22, 723-737.
87.
MessnerM.A. (2016). Forks in the road of men’s gender politics: Men’s rights vs. feminist allies. International Journal for Crime, Justice, and Social Democracy, 5, 6-20.
88.
MessnerM. A.MontezdeOcaJ. (2005). The male consumer as loser: Beer and liquor ads in mega sports media events. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1879-1909. doi:10.1086/427523
89.
MessnerM. A.SaboD. F. (1994). Sex, violence & power in sports: Rethinking masculinity. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
90.
Mikel BrownL.Chesney-LindM.SteinN. (2007). Patriarchy matters: Toward a gendered theory of teen violence and victimization. Violence Against Women, 13, 1249-1273. doi:10.1177/1077801207310430
91.
MitchellK. S.FreitagJ. L. (2011). Forum theatre for bystanders: A new model for gender violence prevention. Violence Against Women, 17, 990-1013. doi:10.1177/1077801211417152
92.
MoeA. M.BellM. P. (2004). Abject economics: The effects of battering and violence on women’s work and employability. Violence Against Women, 10, 29-55. doi:10.1177/1077801203256016
93.
MoraR. (2012). “Do it for all your pubic hairs!” Latino boys, masculinity, and puberty. Gender & Society, 26, 433-460.
94.
MorrisE. (2012). Learning the hard way: Masculinity, place, and the gender gap in education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
95.
NashS. T. (2005). Through black eyes: African American women’s constructions of their experiences with intimate male partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11, 1420-1440. doi:10.1177/1077801205280272
96.
NguyenD.ParkhillM. R. (2014). Integrating attachment and depression in the confluence model of sexual assault perpetration. Violence Against Women, 20, 994-1011. doi:10.1177/1077801214546233
97.
Parra-CardonaJ. R.Escobar-ChewA. R.HoltropK.CarpenterG.GuzmánR.HernándezD., et al. (2013). “En el Grupo Tomas Conciencia (In group you become aware)”: Latino immigrants’ satisfaction with a culturally informed intervention for men who batter. Violence Against Women, 19, 107-132. doi:10.1177/1077801212475338
98.
PascoeC. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school (1st ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
99.
PascoeC. J. (2015). Manhood acts: Gender and the practices of domination by Michael Schwalbe. Social Forces, 94(4), e114. doi:10.1093/sf/sou135
100.
PascoeC. J.HollanderJ. A. (2016). Good guys don’t rape: Gender, domination, and mobilizing rape. Gender & Society, 30, 67-79. doi:10.1177/0891243215612707
101.
PenceE.PaymarM. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.
102.
PeraltaR. L.TuttleL. A.SteeleJ. L. (2010). At the intersection of interpersonal violence, masculinity, and alcohol use: The experiences of heterosexual male perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 16, 387-409. doi:10.1177/1077801210363539
103.
PhillipsB.PhillipsD. A. (2010). Learning from youth exposed to domestic violence: Decentering DV and the primacy of gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 16, 291-312. doi:10.1177/1077801209359193
104.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.
105.
RosenL. N.KaminskiR. J.ParmleyA. M.KnudsonK. H.FancherP. (2003). The effects of peer group climate on intimate partner violence among married male U.S. army soldiers. Violence Against Women, 9, 1045-1071. doi:10.1177/1077801203255504
106.
RydstrømH. (2003). Encountering “hot” anger: Domestic violence in contemporary Vietnam. Violence Against Women, 9, 676-697. doi:10.1177/1077801203009006004
SchrockD. P.PadavicI. (2007). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity in a batterer intervention program. Gender & Society, 21, 625-649.
109.
SchrockD. P.SchwalbeM. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277-295.
110.
SchwalbeM. (2005). Identity stakes, manhood acts, and the dynamics of accountability. In DenzinN. (Ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction: Vol. 28. Studies in symbolic interaction (pp. 65-81). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. doi:10.1016/S0163-2396(04)28010-3
111.
SchwalbeM. (2014). The masculinities industry. In SchwalbeM. (Ed.), Manhood acts: Gender and the practices of domination (pp. 26-50). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
112.
SchwartzM. D.DeKeseredyW. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113.
SchwartzM. D.NogradyC. A. (1996). Fraternity membership, rape myths, and sexual aggression on a college campus. Violence Against Women, 2, 148-162. doi:10.1177/1077801296002002003
114.
SnowD. A.AndersonL. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336-1371. doi:10.2307/2779840
StorerH. L.CaseyE. A.CarlsonJ.EdlesonJ. L.TolmanR. M. (2016). Primary prevention is? A global perspective on how organizations engaging men in preventing gender-based violence conceptualize and operationalize their work. Violence Against Women, 22, 249-268. doi:10.1177/1077801215601247
117.
TangS.-K.WongD.CheungM.-C. (2002). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8, 968-996. doi:10.1177/107780102400447096
118.
TownsA. J.TerryG. (2014). “You’re in that realm of unpredictability”: Mateship, loyalty, and men challenging men who use domestic violence against women. Violence Against Women, 20, 1012-1036. doi:10.1177/1077801214546232
119.
VaccaroC. A.SchrockD. P.McCabeJ. M. (2011). Managing emotional manhood: Fighting and fostering fear in mixed martial arts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 414-437. doi:10.1177/0190272511415554
120.
VieraitisL. M.WilliamsM. R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities: A racially disaggregated analysis. Violence Against Women, 8, 35-63. doi:10.1177/10778010222182937
121.
WangT.ParishW. L.LaumannE. O.LuoY. (2009). Partner violence and sexual jealousy in China: A population-based survey. Violence Against Women, 15, 774-798. doi:10.1177/1077801209334271
122.
WeissK. (2009). “Boys will be boys” and other gendered accounts: An exploration of victims’ excuses and justifications for unwanted sexual contact and coercion. Violence Against Women, 15, 810-834.
WilkinsA. C. (2009). Masculinity dilemmas: Sexuality and intimacy talk among Christians and Goths. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34, 343-368. doi:10.1086/591087
125.
WilmerdingE.Knuth-BouraceeM.EdlesonJ. L. (2018). Reflections on Jackson Katz and the MVP program. Violence Against Women, 24, 1794-1801. doi:10.1177/1077801217753324
