Supporting Rape Survivors Through the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme: An Exploration of English and Welsh Independent Sexual Violence Advisors’ Experiences
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2018
Supporting Rape Survivors Through the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme: An Exploration of English and Welsh Independent Sexual Violence Advisors’ Experiences
English and Welsh responses to rape have long been critically examined, leading to attempted improvements in the criminal justice system. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS) and the difficulties applying it to rape. To begin addressing this gap, researchers interviewed three, and qualitatively surveyed 22, Independent Sexual Violence Advisors. The findings suggest that CICS may not only reinforce rape myths and disadvantage vulnerable survivors, but is also a source of validation and contributes to survivor justice. The study, while exploratory, therefore, highlights the need for further discussion about rape survivor compensation.
AciernoR.ResnickH. S.FloodA.HolmesM. (2003). An acute post-rape intervention to prevent substance use and abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1701-1715.
2.
BairdV.RadfordJ. (2011, November). Compensation matters: How the CICA responds to applications from victims of rape. Paper Presented at the Fifth North East Conference on Sexual Violence, University of Durham.
3.
BohnerG.ReinhardM. A.RutzS.SturmS.KerschbaumB.EfflerD. (1998). Rape myths as neutralising cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men’s self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
4.
BrienenM. E. I.HoegenE. H. (2000). Victims of crime in 22 European jurisdictions: The implementation of recommendation 85 (11) of the Council of Europe on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Productions.
5.
BrymanA. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BuckK. (2005). State compensation to crime victims and the principle of social solidarity. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 13, 148-178.
7.
BurrowesN. (2013). Responding to the challenge of rape myths in court: A guide for prosecutors. London, England: NB Research.
8.
Committee of Public Accounts. (2008). Compensating victims of violent crime: Fifty-fourth report of session 2007-08. London, England: HMSO.
9.
CopsD.PleysierS. (2014). Usual suspects, ideal victims and vice versa: The relationship between youth offending and victimisation and the mediating influence of risky lifestyles. European Journal of Criminology, 11, 361-378.
10.
Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. (n.d.). Reporting the crime of violence to police or other authorities. London, England: Ministry of Justice.
11.
Crown Prosecution Service. (2013). Charging perverting the course of justice and wasting police time in cases involving allegedly false rape and domestic violence allegations. London, England: Crown Prosecution Service Equality & Diversity Unit.
12.
CurtisS.GeslerW.SmithG.WashburnS. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1001-1014.
13.
Department for Work & Pensions. (2015). Jobseekers allowance. London, England: Author.
14.
DinosS.BurrowesN.HammondK.CunliffeC. (2015). A systematic review of juries’ assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making?International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43, 36-49.
15.
EllisonL.MunroV. (2013). Better the devil you know? “Real rape” stereotypes and the relevance of a previous relationship in (mock) juror deliberations. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 17, 299-322.
16.
FeldthusenB.HankivskyO.GreavesL. (2000). Therapeutic consequences of civil actions for damages and compensation claims by victims of sexual abuse. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 12, 66-116.
17.
FelsonR. B.ParéP. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597-610.
18.
FrewinK.PondR.TuffinK. (2009). Sexual abuse, counselling and compensation: Discourses in New Zealand newspapers. Feminism & Psychology, 29, 29-47.
19.
GoboG. (2007). Sampling, representativeness and generalisability. In SealeC.GoboG.GubriumJ.SilvermanD. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 405-426). London, England: Sage.
20.
The Havens. (2010). Wake up to rape: Research summary report. London, England: Author.
21.
HM Government. (2011). Government response to the Stern review. London, England: Cabinet Office.
22.
Home Office. (2013). Overview of sexual offending in England & Wales. London, England: Author.
23.
JordanJ. (2012). Silencing rape, silencing women. In BrownJ.WalklateS. (Eds.), Handbook on sexual violence (pp. 253-286). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
24.
KellyL. (2010). The (in)credible words of women: False allegations in European rape research. Violence Against Women, 16, 1345-1355.
25.
KunstM.KosterN.van HeugtenJ. (2015). Performance evaluations and victim satisfaction with state compensation for violent crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1-18.
26.
LangevinL. (2010). The Quebec Crime Victims Compensation Act: When the clock is ticking against victims of intra-familial sexual abuse. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 22, 485-504.
27.
LeaS.FalconeA.DoyleK.ReardonS. (2015). An audit of independent sexual violence advisors in England and Wales. London, England: Kings College London & Lime Culture CIC.
28.
McGlynnC.DownesJ.WestmarlandN. (2017). Seeking justice for survivors of sexual violence: Recognition, voice and consequences. In KeenanM.ZinsstagE. (Eds.), Sexual violence and restorative justice: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions (pp. 179-191). London, England: Routledge.
29.
MiersD. (2013). Offender and state compensation for victims of crime: Two decades of development and change. International Review of Victimology, 20, 145-168.
30.
MiersD. (2014). Compensating deserving victims of crime: The 2012 Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. Legal Studies, 34, 242-278.
31.
MiersD. (2016). State compensation for victims of crime. In VanfraechemI.PembertonA.NdahindaF. (Eds.), Justice for victims: Perspectives on Rights, transitions and reconciliations (pp. 105-139). London, England: Routledge.
New Zealand Government. (2016). Victims’ information. Available from www.victimsinfo.govt.nz
36.
PayneS. (2009). Rape victim experience review. London, England: Home Office.
37.
PettiforT. (2015, February15). Rape victims’ compensation cut because of past offence such as using mobile phone while driving. The Mirror. Retrieved from www.mirror.co.uk/news
38.
RenzettiC. (2009). Intimate partner violence and economic disadvantage. In StarkE.BuzawaE. (Eds.), Violence against women in families and relationships (pp. 73-92). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
39.
RistovskiA.WertheimE. (2005). Investigation of compensation source, trait empathy, satisfaction with outcome and forgiveness in the criminal context. Australian Psychologist, 40, 63-69.
40.
RoseM. P.NadlerJ.ClarkJ. (2006). Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims. Law and Human Behaviour, 30, 203-219.
41.
SandersonC. (2006). Counselling adult survivors of child sexual abuse. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
42.
SeearK.FraserS. (2014). The addict as victim: Producing the “problem” of addiction in Australian victims of crime compensation laws. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 826-835.
43.
SmithO. (2014). Observing justice: Court responses to rape and sexual assault (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from EThOS database, University of Bath. (uk.bl.ethos.642019)
44.
SmithO.SkinnerT. (2012). Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault. Feminist Criminology, 7, 298-326.
45.
SmithO.SkinnerT. (2016). How rape myths are used and challenged in rape and sexual assault trials. Social & Legal Studies, 26, 441-466.
46.
SternV. (2010). The Stern review. London, England: Home Office.
47.
TemkinJ.KrahéB. (2008). Sexual assault & the justice gap: A question of attitude. Oxford, UK: Hart.
48.
Thomson Reuters Foundation. (2015). Compensation schemes: Comparative report on national State compensation schemes. London, England: TRUSTLaw.
49.
TurveyB. E.McGrathM. (2011). False allegations of sexual assault. In SavinoJ.TurveyB. (Eds.), Rape investigation handbook (2nd ed., pp. 269-292). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
50.
WeissK. G. (2010). Too ashamed to report: Deconstructing the shame of sexual victimization. Feminist Criminology, 5, 286-310.
51.
WheatcroftJ. M.WalklateS. (2014). Thinking differently about “false allegations” in cases of rape: The search for truth. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3, 239-248.
