Throughout the United States, hundreds of thousands of sexual assault kits (SAKs) have not been submitted by the police for forensic DNA testing, which raises complex issues regarding how victims ought to be notified about what happened to their kits. In this project, we evaluated a victim-centered, trauma-informed victim notification protocol that was implemented in Detroit, Michigan. Most victims (84%) did not have a strong negative emotional reaction to notification, and most (57%) decided to reengage with the criminal justice system. Victims of nonstranger sexual assaults were less likely to reengage postnotification compared with victims of stranger rape.
BeebeJ. (2001). Rapid assessment process: An introduction. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
2.
BeebeJ. (2014). Rapid qualitative inquiry: A field guide to team-based assessment (2nd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
3.
ButlerJ. M. (2005). Forensic DNA typing: Biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
4.
CampbellR. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 68, 702-717.
5.
CampbellR.DworkinE.Fehler-CabralG. (2009). An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women’s mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 225-246.
6.
CampbellR.FeeneyH.Fehler-CabralG.ShawJ.HorsfordS. (2017). The national problem of untested sexual assault kits (SAKs): Scope, causes, and future directions for research, policy, and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 363-376. doi: 10.1177/1524838015622436.
7.
CampbellR.Fehler-CabralG.HorsfordS. (2017). Creating a victim notification protocol for untested sexual assault kits: An empirically-supported planning framework. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 13, 3-13.
8.
CampbellR.Fehler-CabralG.PierceS. J.SharmaD.BybeeD.ShawJ.et al. (2015). The Detroit sexual assault kit (SAK) action research project (ARP) (NIJ 2011-DN-BX-0001) (NCJRS Document No. 248680). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
9.
CampbellR.GreesonM. R.Fehler-CabralG. (2013). With care and compassion: Adolescent sexual assault victims’ experiences in Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 9, 68-75.
10.
CampbellR.ShawJ.Fehler-CabralG. (2015). Shelving justice: The discovery of thousands of untested rape kits in Detroit. City & Community, 14, 151-166.
11.
CampbellR.TownsendS. M. (2011). Defining the scope of sexual violence. In RenzettiC.EdlesonJ.BergenR. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 95-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
ChenY.UllmanS. E. (2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 16, 262-279.
13.
DavidsonE. J. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Department of Justice. (2013). A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations: Adults & adolescents (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
15.
EvergreenS. D. H. (2014). Presenting data effectively: Communicating your findings for maximum impact. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
FelsonR. B.ParéP. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597-610.
17.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6-38.
18.
FryD. A.MessingerA. M.RickertV. I.O’ConnorM. K.PalmettoN.LesselH.DavidsonL. L. (2013). Adolescent relationship violence: Help-seeking and help-giving behaviors among peers. Journal of Urban Health, 91, 320-334.
19.
GarsonG. D. (2012). Measures of association. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates.
20.
GreenwoodD. J.LevinM. (2006). Introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
HendersonS.SegalE. H. (2013). Visualizing qualitative data in evaluation research. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013, 53-71.
22.
Human Rights Watch. (2009). Testing justice: The rape kit backlog in Los Angeles city and county. New York: Author.
23.
Human Rights Watch. (2010). “I used to think the law would protect me” Illinois’s failure to test rape kits. New York: Author.
24.
Human Rights Watch. (2013). Capitol offense: Police mishandling sexual assault cases in the District of Columbia. New York: Author.
25.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559-604). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
KitchenC. M. R. (2009). Nonparametric vs. parametric tests of location in biomedical research. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 147, 571-572.
27.
KlofasJ.HippleN. K.McGarrellE. (Eds.). (2010). The new criminal justice: American communities and the changing world of crime control. New York: Routledge.
28.
KossM. P.FigueredoA. J. (2004). Change in cognitive mediators of rape’s impact on psychosocial health across 2 years of recovery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1063-1072.
MartinC. E.HoustonA. M.MmariK. N.DeckerM. R. (2012). Urban teens and young adults describe drama, disrespect, dating violence and help-seeking preferences. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 957-966.
31.
MartinP. Y. (2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. New York: Routledge.
32.
Michigan Domestic and Sexual Violence Prevention and Treatment Board. (2011). The 400 project report. Lansing, MI: Author.
33.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
National Center on Domestic Violence, Trauma & Mental Health. (2011). Creating trauma-informed services: Tipsheet series. Chicago, IL: Author.
35.
National Institute of Justice. (2010). Solicitation: Strategic approaches to sexual assault kit (SAK) evidence: An action research project (SL #000947). Washington, DC: Author.
36.
ParnisD.DuMontJ. (2006). Symbolic power and the institutional response to rape: Uncovering the cultural dynamics of a forensic technology. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 43, 73-93.
37.
PattersonD.CampbellR. (2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191-205.
38.
PettM. A. (1997). Nonparametric statistics for health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Sexual Violence Justice Institute. (2008). Becoming victim centered. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault (MNCASA).
40.
ShawJ. L.CampbellR.CainD. (2016). The view from inside the system: How police explain their response to sexual assault. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58, 446-462.
41.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
SteenkampM. M.DicksteinB. D.Salters-PedneaultK.HofmannS. G.LitzB. T. (2012). Trajectories of PTSD symptoms following sexual assault: Is resilience the modal outcome?Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25, 469-474.
43.
StromK. J.HickmanM. J. (2010). Unanalyzed evidence in law-enforcement agencies: A national examination of forensic processing in police departments. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 381-404.
44.
ZinzowH. M.ResnickH. S.BarrS. C.DanielsonC. K.KilpatrickD. G. (2012). Receipt of post-rape medical care in a national sample of female victims. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 183-187.
