Although researchers and practitioners have established that men and women use force in their intimate heterosexual relationships for very different reasons, there is a dearth of information regarding the events that surrounds women’s arrests and subsequent court orders to anti-violence intervention programming. This information is fundamental to improving Criminal Legal System (CLS) and community-partner understanding of and response to intimate partner violence (IPV). The authors meet this need by analyzing 208 women’s descriptions of their arrests and subsequent court order to intervention programs for using force. From these, the authors frame nine categorical descriptions of women’s actions. The descriptions and categories highlight areas for CLS and community-partners’ growing understanding of this complex issue.
AndersonK. L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 14, 1444-1457.
2.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
AsmusM. E. (2004). At a crossroads: Developing a prosecution response to battered women who fight back. Duluth, MN: Praxis International.
4.
BallanM. S.FreyerM. B. (2012). Self-defense among women with disabilities: An unexplored domain in domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 18, 1083-1107.
5.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31-48.
6.
BrushL. D. (2011). Poverty, battered women, and work in U.S. public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BuiH. N.MorashM. (1999). Domestic violence in the Vietnamese immigrant community: An exploratory study. Violence Against Women, 5, 769-795.
8.
Chesney-LindM. (1988). Doing feminist criminology. The Criminologist, 13, 16-17.
9.
Chesney-LindM. (2002). Imprisoning women: The unintended victims of mass imprisonment. In MauerM.Chesney-LindM. (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 79-94). New York, NY: The New Press.
10.
Chesney-LindM.IrwinK. (2008). Beyond bad girls: Gender, violence, and hype. New York: Routledge.
11.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1251-1299.
12.
DasguptaS. D. (1999). Just like men? A critical view of violence by women. In ShepardM. F.PenceE. L. (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DasguptaS. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389.
14.
DichterM. E. (2013). “They arrested me—and I was the victim”: Women’s experiences with getting arrested in the context of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 23, 81-98.
DunfordF.HuizingaD.ElliottD. S. (1989). The Omaha domestic violence experiments (Final report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
17.
FriezeI. H. (1983). Investigating the causes and consequences of marital rape. Signs, 8, 532-553.
18.
GardnerD. (2007). Victim-defendants in mandated treatment: An ethical quandary. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(3-4), 75-93.
19.
GilfusM. (1999). The price of the ticket: A survivor-centered appraisal of trauma theory. Violence Against Women, 5, 1238-1257.
20.
GoettingA. (1999). Getting out: Life stories of women who left abusive men. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
GoodmarkL. (2008). When is a battered woman not a battered woman? When she fights back. 20 Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 75, 75-129.
22.
HambyS. (2014). Battered women’s protective strategies: Stronger than you know. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
HardingS. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method. In HardingS. (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24.
HavilandM.FryeV.RajahV.ThukralJ.TrinityM. (2001). The family protection and domestic violence intervention act of 1995: Examining the effects of mandatory arrest in New York City. New York: Urban Justice Center.
25.
HenningK.FederL. (2004). A comparison of men and women arrested for domestic violence: Who presents the greater threat?Journal of Family Violence, 19, 69-80.
26.
HesterM. (2012). Portrayal of women as intimate partner domestic violence perpetratorsViolence Against Women, 18(9), 1067-1082.
27.
HirschelJ. D.HutchinsonI. W.IIIDeanC.KelleyJ. J.PesackieC. E. (1990). Charlotte spouse assault replication project: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
28.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018.
29.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322-349.
30.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M.XuY. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20, 186-207.
31.
KleinA. R. (2004). The criminal justice system response to domestic violence. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
32.
LambS. (1996). The trouble with blame: Victims, perpetrators, & responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LaranceL. Y. (2006). Serving women who use force in their intimate heterosexual relationships: An extended view. Violence Against Women, 12, 622-640.
34.
LaranceL. Y. (2007, Winter). When she hits him: Why the institutional response deserves reconsideration. Violence Against Women Newsletter: Prosecuting Attorney’s Association of Michigan, 5(4), 11-19.
35.
LaranceL. Y. (2012). Commentary on Wilson, Woods, Emerson and Donenberg: The necessity for practitioner vigilance in assessing the full context of an individual’s life experiences. Psychology of Violence: Special Issue on Interconnections Among Different Types of Violence, 2, 208-210.
36.
LaranceL. Y. (2015). A practitioner’s response to: “Addressing violence by female partners is vital to prevent or stop violence against women: Evidence from the multisite batterer intervention evaluation,” by Murray Straus. Violence Against Women, 20, 889-899.
37.
LaranceL. Y.Hoffman-RuzickaA.ShivasJ. B. (2009). Vista: A program for women who use force. Morristown, NJ: Jersey Center for Nonviolence.
38.
LaranceL. Y.MillerS. L. (2015). Finding the middle ground: Reimagining responses to women’s use of force. University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review, 5, 437-443.
39.
LaranceL. Y.RoussonA. (2016). Facilitating change: A process of renewal for women who have used force in their intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 22, 876-891.
40.
McMahonM.PenceE. (2003). Making social change: Reflections on individual and institutional advocacy with women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 1, 47-74.
41.
MillerS. L. (1989). Unintended side effects of pro-arrest policies and their race and class implications for battered women: A cautionary note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 299-316.
42.
MillerS. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
43.
MillerS. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s violence in relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44.
MorashM. (2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
45.
O’DellA. (2009). Why do police arrest victims of domestic violence? The need for comprehensive training and investigative protocols. In McCloskeyK. A.SitakerM. H. (Eds.), Backs against the wall: Battered women’s resistance strategies (pp. 49-86). New York: Routledge.
46.
OsthoffS. (2002). But, Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit. Violence Against Women, 8, 1521-1544.
PenceE.ConnellyL.ScaiaM. (2011). Turning points: A nonviolence curriculum for women. Grand Rapids, MN: Domestic Violence Turning Points. Retrieved from http://dvturningpoints.com/products
51.
PenceE.DasguptaS. D. (2006). Re-examining “battering”: Are all acts of violence against intimate partners the same?Duluth, MN: Praxis International.
PotterH. (2008). Battle cries: Black women and intimate partner violence. New York: New York University Press.
54.
RajanM.McCloskeyK. A. (2007). Victims of intimate partner violence: Arrest rates across recent studies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15, 3-4, 27-52.
55.
RenzettiC. M. (1999). The challenges to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In LambS. (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 42-56). New York: New York University Press.
56.
RichieB. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.
57.
RichieB. E. (2000). A Black feminist reflection on the antiviolence movement. Signs, 25, 1133-1137.
58.
RichieB. E. (2015). Reimagining the movement to end gender violence: Anti-racism, prison abolition, women of color feminisms, and other radical visions of justice (Transcript). University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review, 5, 257-273.
59.
RistockJ. (2002). No more secrets: Violence in lesbian relationships. New York: Routledge.
60.
RoyD. (2012). South Asian battered women’s use of force against intimate male partners: A practice note. Violence Against Women, 18(9), 1108-1118.
61.
SaundersD. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1424-1448.
62.
SchechterS. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston, MA: South End Press.
63.
ShermanL. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
64.
ShermanL. W.BerkR. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
65.
SmithD. E. (1989). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
66.
SokoloffN. (Ed.). (2005). Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
67.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
StrausM. A. (2014). Addressing violence by female partners is vital to prevent or stop violence against women: Evidence from the multisite batterer intervention evaluation. Violence Against Women, 20, 889-899.
69.
SwanS. C.GamboneL.Lee Van HornM.SnowD.SullivanT. (2012). Factor structures for aggression and victimization among women who used aggression against male partners. Violence Against Women, 18, 1045-1066.
70.
SwanS. C.SnowD. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286-319.
71.
SwanS. C.SnowD. L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among abused women who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75-109.
72.
ValliR. (2007). Resistance as edgework in violent intimate relationships of drug-involved women. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 196-213.
73.
WestC. M. (2002). Battered, black, and blue: An overview of violence in the lives of Black women. Women & Therapy, 25(3/4), 5-27.
74.
WestC. M. (2009). “Sorry, we have to take you in”: Black battered women arrested for intimate partner violence. In McCloskeyK. A.SitakerM. H. (Eds.), Backs against the wall: Battered women’s resistance strategies (pp. 87-112). New York: Routledge.
75.
WorcesterN. (2002). Women’s use of force: Complexities and challenges of taking the issue seriously. Violence Against Women, 8, 1390-1415.
76.
YoshihamaM. (1999). Domestic violence against women of Japanese descent in Los Angeles: Two methods of estimating prevalence. Violence Against Women, 5, 69-897.
