This article explores the author’s practice observations while working with women who use force (WWUF) in their intimate heterosexual relationships. The VISTA Program’s approach to assessment, education and support, and advocacy frames a description of the impact services have had on the lives of WWUF. By contextualizing a woman’s experiences, with the aid of the ecological nested model, VISTA staff tailor services to member needs. This article’s purpose is to provide an extended view of serving WWUF, one grounded in a “healing place” approach that builds on traditional survivors support group strengths and is distinctly different from batterers’ intervention.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
2.
Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y., & Thelen, R. E. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3, 462-481.
3.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
4.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Recent advances in research on the ecology of human development. In Development as action in context: Problem behavior and normal youth development (pp. 287-309). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
5.
Dasgupta, S. D. (1999). Just like men? A critical view of violence by women. In M. Shepard & E. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389.
7.
Edelson, J. L. (1998). Fact & fantasy: Violent women: Social service agencies have a responsibility to know the difference. Minnesota Center Against Domestic Violence and Abuse. Retrieved May 14, 2004, from http://www.mincava.umn.edu/documents/factfantasy/factfantasy.html
8.
Fiebert, M. (1997). Annotated bibliography: References examining assaults by women on their spouses/partners. Sexuality and Culture, 1, 273-286.
9.
Gutierrez, L. (1990). Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective. Social Work, 35, 149-153.
10.
Hamberger, L. K. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their contexts. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 1, 117-129.
11.
Hamberger, L. K., & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implications for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 124-137.
12.
House, E. (2001). When women use force: An advocacy guide to understanding this issue and conducting an assessment with individuals who have used force to determine their eligibility for services from a domestic violence agency. Reprinted by the National Clearinghouse for the Defense of Battered Women, Philadelphia, PA.
13.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
14.
Larance, L. Y., & Porter, M. L. (2004). Observations from practice: Support group membership as a process of social capital formation among female survivors of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 676-690.
15.
Lischick, C. W. (1999). Coping and related characteristics delineating battered women’s experiences in self-defined, difficult/hurtful dating relationships: A multicultural study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark.
16.
Martin, E. M. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
17.
Miller, J. B. (1991). The construction of anger in women and men. In J. V. Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s growth in connection (pp. 181-196). New York: Guilford.
18.
Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
19.
Osthoff, S. (2002). But, Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit. Violence Against Women, 8, 1521-1544.
20.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense?Violence and Victims, 1, 47-58.
21.
Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424-1448.
22.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston: South End.
23.
Stark, E. (1995). Re-presenting woman battering: From battered woman’s syndrome to coercive control. Albany Law Review, 58, 959-1306.
24.
Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
25.
UNIFEM. (2003). Not a minute more: Ending violence against women. Retrieved August 8, 2004, from http://www.unifem.org
26.
Worcester, N. (2001). Women who use force in heterosexual domestic violence: Putting the context (back in) the picture. Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence, 20(1), 2-2.
27.
Worcester, N. (2002). Women’s use of force: Complexities and challenges of taking the issue seriously. Violence Against Women, 8, 1390-1415.
