The authors highlight a community’s response to women’s use of force, detail aspects of intervention strategies, and introduce a conceptual model representing the women’s change process. In doing so, they encourage community partnerships, continued intervention innovation, and further research. Their observations suggest an intervention philosophy and approach that women have described as one of personal “renewal.” The community’s experiences are notable in light of national efforts to effectively meet the needs of female survivors of intimate partner violence who have used force.
AndersonK. L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15, 1444-1457.
2.
ArnoldG.AkeJ. (2013). Reframing the narrative of the battered women’s movement. Violence Against Women, 19, 557-578.
3.
Batterer Intervention Services Coalition of Michigan. (2010, November). National conference—“When she hits him: Why gender and context matter.” Retrieved from http://www.biscmi.org/wshh/
4.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31-48.
5.
BuiH. N.MorashM. (1999). Domestic violence in the Vietnamese immigrant community: An exploratory study. Violence Against Women, 5, 769-795.
6.
BurkC. (2004). Advocacy model language vs. criminal legal system language handout. Northwest network of bisexual, trans, lesbian & gay survivors of abuse. Seattle, WA: Northwest Network.
7.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
8.
DasguptaS. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of force in their intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389.
9.
DichterM. E. (2013). They arrested me—and I was the victim: Women’s experience with getting arrested in the context of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 23, 81-98.
10.
FrasierP. Y.SlattL.KowlowitzV.GlowaP. T. (2001). Using the stages of change model to counsel victims of intimate partner violence. Patient Education & Counseling, 43, 211-217.
11.
GilfusM. (1999). The price of the ticket: A survivor-centered appraisal of trauma theory. Violence Against Women, 5, 1238-1257.
12.
HouseE. (n.d.). When women use force: An advocacy guide to understanding this issue and conducting an assessment with individuals who have used force to determine their eligibility for services from a domestic violence agency. Ann Arbor, MI: Domestic Violence Project/SAFE House. Retrieved from http://csswashtenaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/wwuferinhouse.pdf
13.
LaranceL. Y. (2006). Serving women who use force in their intimate heterosexual relationships: An extended view. Violence Against Women, 12, 622-640.
14.
LaranceL. Y. (2007). When she hits him: Why the institutional response deserves reconsideration. Violence Against Women Newsletter: Prosecuting Attorney’s Association of Michigan, 5(4), 11-19.
15.
LaranceL. Y.CapeJ. K.GarvinD. J. H. (2012). Meridians for incarcerated women: Facilitator manual. Ann Arbor, MI: Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County.
16.
LaranceL. Y.DasguptaS. D. (Guest Eds.). (2012). Contemporary issues regarding battered women’s use of nonfatal force in their intimate heterosexual relationships [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 18, 1004-1007.
17.
LaranceL. Y.Hoffman-RuzickaA.ShivasJ. B. (2009). VISTA program curriculum: An extended view of serving women who use force. Morristown, NJ: Jersey Center for Nonviolence.
18.
LaranceL. Y.PorterM. L. (2004). Observations from practice: Support group membership as a process of social capital formation among female survivors of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 676-690.
19.
MillerS. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
20.
MillerS. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s use of violence in relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21.
MillerS. L.GregoryC.IovanniL. (2005). One size fits all? A gender-neutral approach to a gender-specific problem: Contrasting batterer treatment programs for male and female offenders. Criminal Justice Review, 16, 336-359.
22.
MillerS. L.MeloyM. L. (2006). Women’s use of force: Voices of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 89-115.
23.
MorashM. (2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
24.
PenceE.DasguptaS. D. (2006). Re-examining “battering”: Are all acts of violence against intimate partners the same?Duluth, MN: Praxis International.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrated model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 276-288.
27.
ProchaskaJ. O.NorcrossJ. C.DiClementeC. C. (1994). Changing for good: A revolutionary six-stage program for overcoming bad habits and moving your life positively forward. New York: Avon Books.
28.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29.
RenzettiC. M. (1999). The challenges to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In LambS. (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 42-56). New York: New York University Press.
30.
RichieB. (2000). A Black feminist reflection on the antiviolence movement. Signs, 24, 1133-1137.
31.
RoyD. (2012). South Asian battered women’s use of force against intimate male partners: A practice note. Violence Against Women, 18, 1108-1118.
32.
SaundersD. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense?Victims and Violence, 1, 47-60.
33.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
YalomI. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
35.
YoshihamaM. (1999). Domestic violence against women of Japanese descent in Los Angeles: Two methods of estimating prevalence. Violence Against Women, 5, 869-897.
