Drawing on in-depth interviews with mothers who were abused by intimate partners, we argue that mothering can be a source of empowerment that helps battered women both care for their children and survive and assert themselves. Women in the study sample described a violation of some aspect of their mothering as the reason they left their partners. However, narrative analysis exposed contradictions in participants’ stories, revealing multiple factors that shaped their decisions to leave. Although motherhood was significant for the women who participated in the study, it was not their only motivation for ending their relationships with abusive partners.
AbelE. K.NelsonM. K. (Eds.). (1990). Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
ArendellT. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1192-1207.
3.
BancroftL.SilvermanJ. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BassinD.HoneyM.KaplanM. M. (Eds.). (1994). Representations of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
ButlerJ. (1997). The psychic life of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
CampbellJ. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359, 1331-1336.
7.
CharmazK. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 675-694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
ChaseS. E.RogersM. F. (2001). Mothers and children: Feminist analyses and personal narratives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CollC. G.SurreyJ. L.WeingartenK. (Eds.). (1998). Mothering against the odds: Diverse voices of contemporary mothers. New York: Guilford Press.
11.
CollinsK. S.SchoenCJosephS.DuchonL.SimantovE.YellowitzM. (1999). Health concerns across a woman’s lifespan: The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women’s Health. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
12.
CollinsP. H. (1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In GlennE. N.ChangG.ForceyL. R. (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 45-65). New York: Routledge.
13.
ConnellyC. D.NewtonR. R.LansverkJ.AaronsG. A. (2000). Assessment of intimate partner violence among high-risk postpartum mothers: Concordance of clinical measures. Women’s Health, 1, 21-37.
14.
DeVoeE.SmithE. (2003). Don’t take my kids: Barriers to service delivery for battered mothers and their young children. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 3, 277-294.
15.
EdlesonJ. (2001). Studying the co-occurrence of child maltreatment and domestic violence in families. In Graham-BermannS. A.EdlesonJ. L. (Eds.), Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention, and social policy (pp. 91-110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fleck-HendersonA. (2000). Domestic violence in the child protection system: Seeing double. Children and Youth Services, 22, 333-354.
18.
GerstelN.GrossH. E. (1995). Gender and families in the United States: The reality of economic dependence. In FreemanJ. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (5th ed., pp. 97-127). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
19.
GlennE. N. (1994). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. In GlennE. N.ChangG.ForceyL. R. (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 1-29). New York: Routledge.
20.
GlennE. N.ChangG.ForceyL. R. (Eds.). (1994). Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency. New York: Routledge.
21.
Graham-BermannS. A.EdlesonJ. L. (Eds.). (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention, and social policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (1987). The private image: Experiential location and method in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, 773-786.
23.
HaysS. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
HoldenG. W.GeffnerR. A.JourilesE. (Eds.). (1998). Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied Issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
JohnsonM. M. (1988). Strong mothers, weak wives: The search for gender equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
KolboJ. R.BlakelyE. H.EngelmanD. (1996). Children who witness domestic violence: A review of empirical literature. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 281-293.
27.
LapierreS. (2008). Mothering in the context of domestic violence: The pervasiveness of a deficit model of mothering. Child and Family Social Work, 13, 454-463.
28.
LosekeD. (1992). The battered woman and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
McMahonM. (1995). Engendering motherhood: Identity and self-transformation in women’s lives. New York: Guilford Press.
OkunL. (1986). Woman abuse: Facts replacing myths. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
PeledE.GilI. B. (2011). The mothering perceptions of women abused by their partner. Violence Against Women, 17, 457-479.
33.
PulidoM. L.GuptaD. (2002). Protecting the child and the family: Integrating domestic violence screening into a child advocacy center. Violence Against Women, 8, 917-933.
34.
RadfordL.HesterM. (2001). Overcoming mother blaming? Future directions for research on mothering and domestic violence. In Graham-BermannS. A.EdlesonJ. L. (Eds.), Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention, and social policy (pp. 135-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
RiessmanC. K. (2002). Analysis of personal narratives. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 695-710). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RobertsD. E. (1999). Mothers who fail to protect their children: Accounting for private and public responsibility. In GlennE. N.ChangG.ForceyL. R. (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 31-49). New York: Routledge.
39.
RuddickS. (1982). Maternal thinking. In ThorneB.YalomM. (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 76-94). New York: Longman.
40.
SchechterS. (1988). Building bridges between activists, professionals, and researchers. In YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 299-312). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of intimate partner violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
42.
VeroffJ.ChadihaL.LeberD.SutherlandL. (1993). Affects and interactions in newlyweds’ narratives: Black and White couples compared. Journal of Narrative Life History, 3, 361-390.
43.
VillaniS. L.RyanJ. E. (1997). Motherhood at the crossroads: Meeting the challenge of a changing role. New York: Insight Books.
44.
ZaretskyE. (1976). Capitalism, the family, and personal life. New York: Harper & Row.
