The U.S. legal system reproduces asymmetric power dynamics within abusive relationships. Existing research fails to delineate how civil protection orders increase mother-survivors’ vulnerability to continued abuse. Interviews with mother-survivors yielded three themes regarding the ways abusers used children and legal proceedings to maintain power over women: (1) litigation abuse, (2) continued coercive control/harassment, and (3) deliberate sabotage/evading parental responsibilities. Findings illustrate the interconnectedness of abusers’ tactics and systemic barriers that jeopardize mother-survivors’ and children's well-being. Recommendations for improving legal system responses include implementing early intervention programs to support families, expanding IPV/A legislation to include coercive control, and increasing training for judges.
BeebleM. L.BybeeD.SullivanC. M. (2007). Abusive men’s use of children to control their partners and ex-partners. European Psychologist, 12(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.1.54
BroughtonS.Ford-GilboeM.VarcoeC. (2024). Understanding what shapes the priorities of women who are mothering in the context of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33(4), 1520–1532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16976
7.
BudigM. J.EnglandP. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657415
8.
CampbellE. (2017). How domestic violence batterers use custody proceedings in family courts to abuse victims, and how courts can put a stop to it. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 24(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.5070/L3241036415
9.
CarcirieriA. T.Fleury-SteinerR. E.MillerS. L. (2019). Hate the players, or the game? The role of court mediators and hearing officers in the civil protection order process. Violence and Victims, 34(4), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-18-00011
10.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
11.
CoyM.ScottE.TweedaleR.PerksK. (2015). “It’s like going through the abuse again”: Domestic violence and women and children’s (un)safety in private law contact proceedings. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 37(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2015.1004863
12.
CrossmanK. A.HardestyJ. L.RaffaelliM. (2016). “He could scare me without laying a hand on me”: Mothers’ experiences of nonviolent coercive control during marriage and after separation. Violence Against Women, 22(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215604744
13.
DeKeseredyW. S.DragiewiczM.SchwartzM. D. (2017). Abusive endings: Separation and divorce violence against women. University of California Press.
14.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11-12), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6
15.
ElizabethV. (2017). Custody stalking: A mechanism of coercively controlling mothers following separation. Feminist Legal Studies, 25(10), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9349-9
16.
ElizabethV.GaveyN.TolmieJ. (2012). “He’s just swapped his fists for the system”: The governance of gender through custody law. Gender & Society, 26(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211434765
FleuryR. E.SullivanC. M.BybeeD. I. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence: Women's experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6(12), 1363–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022183695
19.
FogartyA.WoolhouseH.GialloR.WoodC.KaufmanJ.BrownS. (2021). Mothers’ experiences of parenting within the context of intimate partner violence: Unique challenges and resilience. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21-22), 10564–10587. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626051988386
20.
GoldfarbS. F. (2008). Reconceiving civil protection orders for domestic violence: Can law help end the abuse without ending the relationship?Cardozo Law Review, 29(4), 1487–1551.
21.
GoodmarkL. (2023). Why centering the family court system won't decrease criminalization of intimate partner violence–and why that's a problem. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 30, 56–66.
22.
GreesonM. R.KennedyA. C.BybeeD. I.BeebleM.AdamsA. E.SullivanC. (2014). Beyond deficits: Intimate partner violence, maternal parenting, and child behavior over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1-2), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9658-y
23.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.
24.
GutowskiE.GoodmanL. A. (2020). “Like i’m invisible”: IPV survivor-mothers’ perceptions of seeking child custody through the family court system. Journal of Family Violence, 35(5), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00063-1
25.
GutowskiE. R.GoodmanL. A. (2023). Coercive control in the courtroom: The legal abuse scale (LAS). Journal of Family Violence, 38, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00408-3
26.
HambergerL. K.LarsenS. E.LehrnerA. (2017). Coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.003
27.
HardestyJ. L. (2002). Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting: An integrative review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(5), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780120200800505
28.
HarpK. L. H.OserC. B. (2016). Factors associated with two types of child custody loss among a sample of African American mothers: A novel approach. Social Science Research, 60, 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.007
29.
HarseyS.FreydJ. J. (2020). Deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender (DARVO): What is the influence on perceived perpetrator and victim credibility?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 29(8), 897–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2020.1774695
30.
HarseyS. J.ZurbriggenE. I.FreydJ. J. (2017). Perpetrator responses to victim confrontation: DARVO and victim self-blame. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(6), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1320777
31.
HaselschwerdtM. L.HardestyJ. L.HansJ. D. (2011). Custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic violence allegations during divorce: Feminist and family violence perspectives. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1694–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370599
32.
HaselschwerdtM. L.HardestyJ. L.ParkS. Y.WardJ. (2020). Civil court responses to IPV and child custody: The role of custody evaluators. In Fleury-SteinerR. E.HefnerM. K.MillerS. L. (Eds.), Civil court responses to intimate partner violence and abuse (pp. 115–138). Cognella.
33.
HayesB. (2012). Abusive men’s indirect control of their partner during the process of separation. Journal of Family Violence, 27(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9428-2
34.
HefnerM. K.BaboololA.Fleury-SteinerR. E.MillerS. L. (2021). Mediating justice: Women’s perceptions of fairness in the civil protection order process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7-8), 3331–3352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518775749
35.
HefnerM. K.MillerS. L.Fleury-SteinerR. E. (2022). Legal consciousness and intimate partner violence: Survivors’ perceptions of protection order violations. Journal of Family Violence, 37, 1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00336-8
36.
Heward-BelleS. (2017). Exploiting the ‘good mother’ as a tactic of coercive control: Domestically violent men’s assaults on women as mothers. Affilia, 32(3), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109917706935
HoltS. (2017). Domestic violence and the paradox of post-separation mothering. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 2049–2067. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw162
39.
JeffriesS. (2016). In the best interests of the abuser: Coercive control, child custody proceedings and the “expert” assessments that guide judicial determinations. Laws, 5(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5010014
40.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press.
41.
KatzE.NikupeteriA.LaitinenM. (2020). When coercive control continues to harm children: Post-separation fathering, stalking and domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 29(4), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2611
42.
LuxG.GillS. (2021). Identifying coercive control in Canadian family law: A required analysis in determining the best interests of the child. Family Court Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 59(4), 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12540
43.
MeierJ. S. (2009). A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. Journal of Child Custody, 6(3-4), 232–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379410903084681
44.
MeierJ. S. (2020). U.S. Child custody outcomes in cases involving parental alienation and abuse allegations: What do the data show?Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1701941
45.
MillerD. J. (1979). Joint custody. Family Law Quarterly, 13(3), 345–412.
46.
MillerS.HefnerM. K.Fleury-SteinerR. (Feb/March 2023). Challenge of “paper abuse” continue in legal proceedings. Domestic Violence Report, 28(3), 39.
47.
MillerS. L.ManzerJ. L. (2021). Safeguarding children’s well-being: Voices from abused mothers navigating their relationships and the civil courts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9-10), 4545–4569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791599
48.
MillerS. L.SmolterN. L. (2011). “Paper abuse”: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012114072
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
51.
PtacekJ. (2023). Feeling trapped: Social class and violence against women. University of California Press.
52.
RichardsT. N.GoverA. R.TudorA. (2021). A nation-wide assessment of empowerment among states’ personal protective order statutes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9-10), 4876–4898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518794511
53.
SaffrenJ. (2021). Coercive control is finally engrained in American law. Domestic Violence Report, 26(4), 49.
54.
SaundersD. G.FallerK. C.TolmanR. M. (2011). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge and custody-visitation recommendations. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238891.pdf
55.
ScottE. S.EmeryR. E. (2014). Gender politics and child custody: The puzzling persistence of the best-interest standard. Law and Contemporary Problems, 77(1), 69–108.
56.
SpearmanK. J.HardestyJ. L.CampbellJ. (2023). Post-separation abuse: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(4), 1255–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15310
57.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
58.
StarkD.ChoplinJ.WellardS. (2019). Properly accounting for domestic violence in child custody cases: An evidence-based analysis and reform proposal. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 26(1), 1–119. https://doi.org/10.36641/mjgl.26.1.properly
TarrN. W. (2003). The cost to children when batterers misuse orders for protection statutes in child custody cases. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 13(1), 35–80.
61.
ThiaraR.HumphreysC. (2017). Absent presence: The ongoing impact of men’s violence on the mother-child relationship. Child and Family Social Work, 22(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12210
62.
TuttyL. M.NixonK. L.RadtkeL. H. (2024). “I worry about my kids’ safety when they visit”: Mothers’ perceptions of father/child post-separation contact in the context of IPV. Violence Against Women, 31(5), 1150–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231225232
63.
TuttyL. M.RadtkeH. L.NixonK. L. (2023). “He tells people that I am going to kill my children”: Post-separation coercive control in men who perpetrate IPV. Violence Against Women, 30(11), 2853–2876. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231166408
64.
WardD. (2015). In her own words: Recognizing and preventing abusive litigation against domestic violence survivors. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 14(2), 429–464.
65.
WildeS.SheeranN.DouglasH. (2024). The psychological impact on mothers who have experienced domestic violence when navigating the family court system: A scoping review. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 31, 764–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2023.2214927
