This paper unsettles the easy optimism and moral aesthetics that can domesticate arts-based research into consumable, uplifting products. Drawing on profane methodologies and artists who have jolted us, we embrace irreverence, obscenity, and the “fuck it” aesthetic—not as nihilism, but as a method to question what is obscured when inquiry is aestheticized as moral good, empowerment, or evocative transformation. We argue that arts-based research risks becoming methodological word-art—superficially disruptive yet institutionally safe—where beauty substitutes for ethics and aesthetic cues replace accountability. Profaning becomes a methodological stance that refuses tidy resolution, resists redemptive outputs, and remains with mess, failure, and unresolved tensions. Profaning artful inquiry is an ethic of discomfort, an invitation to fuck around and find out what research might be when stripped of redemptive sheen.
BagleyC.Castro-SalazarR. (2024). Whose side are we on? Toward an emancipatory ethic in critical arts-based research. Qualitative Inquiry, 31(10), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241288600
2.
BaroneT. J.EisnerE. W. (2011). Arts based research. Sage.
3.
BensonK. E.Heiden-RootesK. M. (2025). Intersectional scholar advocacy in a shifting United States political landscape. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 17(4), 864–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70024
4.
BerlantL. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
5.
BowersA. (2007). The weight of relevance, still life of the AIDS memorial quilt in storage [colored pencil drawing]. Artist.
BurkeE. (2015). A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful: With an introductory discourse concerning taste (2nd revised ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1757)
8.
Cahnmann-TaylorM. (2008). Four guiding principles for arts-based research practice. In Cahnmann-TaylorM.SiegesmundR. (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (2nd ed., pp. 247–258). Routledge.
ChakravartyD.StandishC. (2024). Consumption as changemaking and producers as artists: Theorizing alt-profit corporations from a transnational feminist perspective. Meridians, 23(2), 332–359. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/943231
11.
ChiltonG.LeavyP. (2020). Arts-based research: Merging social research and the creative arts. In LeavyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 601–632). Oxford University Press.
CoemansS.HannesK. (2017). Researchers under the spell of the arts: Two decades of using arts-based methods in community-based inquiry with vulnerable populations. Educational Research Review, 22, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003
DugganJ.DunneS.O’DonnellD. (2025). Participating in the impasse? The cruel optimism of the youth participatory democratic project fantasy. Qualitative Research, 25(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241306217
16.
EdwardsJ.GraulundR. (2013). Grotesque. Routledge.
17.
FinleyS. (2008). Arts- based research. In KnowlesJ. G.ColeA. (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 71–81). Sage.
18.
FinleyS. (2017). Critical arts-based inquiry. Performances of resistance politics. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 561–575). Sage.
19.
FlamJ. (Ed.). (1996). Robert Smithson: The collected writings. University of California Press.
20.
GallopJ. (1988). Thinking through the body. Columbia University Press.
21.
GoopyS.KassanA. (2019). Arts-based engagement ethnography: An approach for making research engaging and knowledge transferable when working with harder-to-reach communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918820424
KingS. (2006). Pink Ribbons, Inc: Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropy. University of Minnesota Press.
27.
KornbluhA. (2024). Immediacy: Or, the style of too late capitalism. Verso Books.
28.
KoroM.WolgemuthJ. (2022). Methodologies for the apocalypse: Unthinking the thinkable. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(6), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221142805
29.
KreikemeierA. (2021). Youth research in community settings: Inspiring social engagement through critical pedagogy, collaboration, and arts-based research. Teachers College Record, 123(11), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221087301
30.
LeavyP. (2020). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. The Guilford Press.
31.
LeavyP. (Ed.). (2017). Handbook of arts-based research. The Guilford Press.
RiceC.BaileyK. A.CookK. (2022). Mobilizing interference as methodology and metaphor in disability arts inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(3–4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211046249
WolgemuthJ. R.JordanL. S. (2024). Critical qualitative inquiry: An optimistic counter in/to a conservative backslide. International Review of Qualitative Research, 17(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447241245110
44.
WolgemuthJ. R.Koro-LjungbergM.BarkoT. (2019). (In defense of) pedagogies of obscenity. Power and Education, 12(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743819850853 (Original work published 2020)
