This literature review demonstrates that conducting and writing critical poetic inquiry research helps develop research representation, writing, and communication toward new understandings of phenomena—especially in research areas examining issues related to identity. Toward these ends, we first briefly describe philosophies and theories underlying poetic inquiry, beginning with a contrast between traditional research philosophies and those originating critical poetic inquiry. Then, we elaborate six specific benefits of critical poetic inquiry (i.e., representation, accessibility, nuance, pattern recognition, high-level thinking, and healing) with examples from across several research fields. Finally, we imagine additional possible benefits of poetic inquiry for further exploration in future research, making recommendations for specific topics and development of critical poetic inquiry processes, theory, and ethics.
ChambersL. A. (2023). Listen to her: Re-finding culturally responsive poetic inquiry as home knowing for women of African descent. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 1133–1154.
CollierJ.Jr.CollierM. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. University of New Mexico Press.
9.
Connor-GreeneP. A.MurdochJ. W.YoungA.PaulC. (2005). Poetry: It’s not just for English class anymore. Teaching of Psychology, 32(4), 215–221.
10.
CuttsQ. M. (2020). More than craft and criteria: The necessity of ars spirituality in (Black women’s) poetic inquiry and research poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 908–919.
DavisC. (2021). Sampling poetry, pedagogy, and protest to build methodology: Critical poetic inquiry as culturally relevant method. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 114–124.
13.
EdwardsR.WellerS. (2012). Shifting analytic ontology: Using I-poems in qualitative longitudinal research. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 202–217.
14.
FaulknerS. L. (2005). Method: Six poems. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 941–949.
15.
FaulknerS. L. (2007). Concern with craft: Using ars poetica as criteria for reading research poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 218–234.
16.
FaulknerS. L. (2014). Family stories, poetry and women’s work: Knit four, frog one [Poems]. Springer.
17.
FaulknerS. L. (2017a). Faulkner writes a middle-aged Ars Poetica. In Butler-KisberL.Guiney YallopJ. J.StewartM.WiebeS. (Eds.), Poetic inquiries of reflection and renewal (pp. 147–152). MacIntyre Purcell Publishing.
18.
FaulknerS. L. (2017b). Poetic inquiry: Poetry as/in/for social research. In LeavyP. (Ed.), The handbook of arts-based research (pp. 208–230). Guilford Press.
19.
FaulknerS. L. (2018). Crank up the feminism: Poetic inquiry as feminist methodology. Humanities, 7(3), Article 85.
20.
FitzpatrickE.FitzpatrickK. (2020). What poetry does for us in education and research. In FitzpatrickE.FitzpatrickK. (Eds.), Poetry, method and education research: Doing critical, decolonising and political inquiry (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
21.
FitzpatrickE.FitzpatrickK. (2014). Disturbing the divide: Poetry as improvisation to disorder power relationships in research supervision. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(1), 50–58.
22.
FitzpatrickK.FitzpatrickE. (2015). “Since feeling is first”: Poetry and research supervision. In EmeraldE.RinehartR. E.GarciaA. (Eds.), Global south ethnographies: Minding the senses (pp. 59–70). Brill.
23.
FloresT. (1982). Field poetry. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 7(1), 16–22.
24.
FurmanR. (2004). Using poetry and narrative as qualitative data: Exploring a father’s cancer through poetry. Families, Systems, & Health, 22(2), 162–170.
25.
Godfrey-SmithP. (2010). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
26.
LahmanM. K.GeistM. R.RodriguezK. L.GragliaP. E.RichardV. M.SchendelR. K. (2010). Poking around poetically: Research, poetry, and trustworthiness. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(1), 39–48.
27.
LahmanM. K.RichardV. M. (2014). Appropriated poetry: Archival poetry in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(3), 344–355.
28.
LahmanM. K.RichardV. M.TemanE. D. (2019). Ish: How to write poemish (research) poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(2), 215–227.
29.
LahmanM. K.RodriguezK. L.RichardV. M.GeistM. R.SchendelR. K.GragliaP. E. (2011). (Re)Forming research poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(9), 887–896.
30.
LugonesM. (1987). Playfulness, “world”-travelling, and loving perception. Hypatia, 2(2), 3–19.
31.
MachadoS. (2016). Faggot speaks: A poetic inquiry into the experience of antigay mistreatment and sexual prejudice. Art/research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 65–87.
32.
McAllisterÁ.BrownN. (2023). Competition and collaboration in higher education: An (auto)ethnographic poetic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–7.
33.
MeyerE. J. (2008). “Who we are matters”: Exploring teacher identities through found poetry. LEARNing Landscapes, 2(1), 195–210.
PaivaD. (2020). Poetry as a resonant method for multi-sensory research. Emotion, Space and Society, 34, 1–7.
37.
PatrickL. D. (2016). Found poetry: Creating space for imaginative arts-based literacy research writing. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65(1), 384–403.
38.
PrendergastM. (2009). “Poem is what?” Poetic inquiry in qualitative social science research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(4), 541–568.
39.
PrendergastM. (2015). Poetic inquiry, 2007–2012: A surrender and catch found poem. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(8), 678–685.
40.
RathJ. (2001). Representing feminist educational research with/in the postmodern: Stories of rape crisis training. Gender & Education, 13(2), 117–136.
41.
RicciR. J. (2003). Autoethnographic verse: Nicky’s boy: A life in two worlds. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 591–596.
42.
RichardsonL. (1993). Poetics, dramatics, and transgressive validity: The case of the skipped line. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 695–710.
