As two (ab)Original women, we consider how a relational approach to the literature review can reflect our broader Indigenous and decolonizing research methodologies. In our research training, we have been exposed to dominant literature review models that advocate for researchers to “identify the gaps” and “occupy a territory,” a process (and vernacular) that feels at odds with Indigenous, relational, and decolonizing principles. We intend to apply the teachings we have learned from Indigenous scholars to the literature review process by proposing a reframing of the literature review, to one that is relational.
Absolon (Minogiizhigokwe)K. E. (2011). Kaandossiwin: How we come to know. Fernwood.
2.
AhenakewC. (2016). Grafting Indigenous ways of knowing onto non-Indigenous ways of being: The (underestimated) challenges of a decolonial imagination. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2016.9.3.323
BattisteM. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations Education: A Literature Review with recommendations. National Working Group on Education and the Minister of Indian Affairs Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC).
6.
Bawaka Country, WrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.LloydK.BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.. . . GrahamM. (2018). Everything is love: Mobilising knowledges, identities, and places as Bawaka. In GombayN.Palomino-SchalschaM. (Eds.), Indigenous places and colonial spaces: The politics of intertwined relations (pp. 51–71). Routledge.
7.
BishopM. (2020). Epistemological violence and Indigenous autoethnographies. In StanleyP. (Ed.), Critical autoethnography and intercultural education: Emerging voices (pp. 19–32). Routledge.
8.
BishopM. (2021a). A rationale for the urgency of Indigenous education sovereignty: Enough’s enough. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48(3), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00404-w
9.
BishopM. (2021b). “Don’t tell me what to do” encountering colonialism in the academy and pushing back with Indigenous autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(5), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1761475
BlairN. (2015). Privileging Australian Indigenous knowledge: Sweet potatoes, spiders, waterlilys, and brick walls. Common Ground.
12.
BrymanA. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
13.
BundaT. (2018). The raced space of learning and teaching: Aboriginal voices speak back to the university. In VassG.MaxwellJ.RudolphS.GulsonK. (Eds.), The relationality of race in education research (pp. 85–96). Routledge.
14.
ChilisaB. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. SAGE.
15.
CoramS. (2008). “Mainstreaming” Indigenous inequality as disadvantage and the silencing of “race” in Australian social, educational and vocational training policy. Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association, 4(1), 1–13.
CzuyK.HogarthM. (2019). Circling the square: Indigenizing the dissertation. Emerging Perspectives, 3(1), 1–16.
18.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies. SAGE.
19.
FoleyD. (2018). Indigenous methodology: Is it invented or is it legitimate?Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, 21(3), 20–38.
20.
FredericksB. L.ClaphamK.BainbridgeR.CollardL.AdamsM.BessarabD.. . . DanielsC. (2014). “Ngulluck Katitj Wah Koorl Koorliny/Us mob going along learning to research together”: Drawing on action research to develop a literature review on Indigenous gendered health and wellbeing. Action Learning Action Research Journal, 20(2), 89–113.
21.
GreenS.Russ-SmithJ.TynanL. (2018). Claiming the space, creating the future. Australian Journal of Education, 62(3), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944118802594
22.
HogarthM. (2017). Speaking back to the deficit discourses: A theoretical and methodological approach. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(1), 21–34.
23.
KovachM. E. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
24.
KwaymullinaA. (2016). Research, ethics and Indigenous peoples: An Australian Indigenous perspective on three threshold considerations for respectful engagement. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(4), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.20507/AlterNative.2016.12.4.8
25.
LeeE. (2016). Aboriginal cultural heritage protection in Tasmania: The failure of rights; the restorative potential of historical resilience. In McGrathP. F. (Ed.), Right to protect sites: Indigenous heritage management in the era of native title (pp. 315–341). AIATSIS Research.
26.
MartinK. L. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for Indigenous and Indigenist re-search. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838
27.
MartinK. L. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Post Pressed.
28.
McKinleyE.SmithL. T. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of Indigenous education. Springer.
29.
MooneyJ.RileyL.BlacklockF. (2018). Yarning up: Stories of challenges and success. Australian Journal of Education, 62(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944118803403
30.
Moreton-RobinsonA. (2013). Towards an Australian Indigenous women’s standpoint theory. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(78), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2013.876664
31.
RigneyL.-I. (1999). Internationalization of an Indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review, 14(2), 109–121.
32.
ShayM. (2021). Extending the yarning yarn: Collaborative Yarning Methodology for ethical Indigenist education research. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 50(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2018.25
33.
ShottonH. J.TachineA. R.NelsonC. A.MinthornR. Z.WatermanS. J. (2018). Living our research through Indigenous scholar sisterhood practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417744578
34.
SimpsonL. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.
35.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
36.
TallbearK. (2016). Dear Indigenous studies, it’s not me, it’s you: Why I left and what needs to change. In Moreton-RobinsonA. (Ed.), Critical Indigenous studies: Engagements in first world locations (pp. 69–82). The University of Arizona Press.
37.
tebrakunna country, & LeeE. (2019). “Reset the relationship”: Decolonising government to increase Indigenous benefit. Cultural Geographies, 26(4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474019842891
38.
ToddZ. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124
39.
TuckE.McKenzieM. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
40.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265
41.
TynanL. (2020). Thesis as kin: Living relationality with research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 16(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120948270
42.
TynanL. (2021). What is relationality? Indigenous knowledges, practices and responsibilities with kin. Cultural Geographies, 28(4), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740211029287
43.
VassG. (2015). Putting critical race theory to work in Australian education research: “We are with the garden hose here.”The Australian Educational Researcher, 42(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0160-1
44.
WestE. G. (2000). An alternative to existing Australian research and teaching models—The Japanangka teaching and research paradigm—An Australian aboriginal model [Doctoral thesis]. Southern Cross University.
45.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
YunkaportaT.MoodieD. (2021). Thought ritual: An Indigenous data analysis method for research. In McKennaT.MoodieD.OnestaP. (Eds.), Indigenous knowledges: Privileging our voices (pp. 87–96). Brill.
