Songspirals bring Country into existence. Co-authored by a more-than-human, Yolŋu-led collaboration, this article centers Yolŋu understandings of time and place and elaborates on our work together through a spiral-based framework. Our Indigenous and Country-led Collective nourishes and shares some Yolŋu understandings of songspirals to enable, enrich, and awaken Country; to challenge and expand Western academic frameworks; and to contribute toward more responsive relationships between people and places. To sing or keen the spirals now means the ongoing creation of place and people—an emergent, more-than-human creativity that literally creates and re-creates existence. Songspirals are more-than-human processes that need active engagement to nourish positive relationships and to heal damaged ones. Songspirals are a keening/singing, of, with, by, for, and as Country.
Bawaka Country including BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.Ganambarr-StubbsM.GanambarrB.MaymuruD.LloydK.WrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.HodgeP. (2018). Meeting across ontologies: Grappling with an ethics of care in our human-more-than-human collaborative work. In HaladayJ.HicksS. (Eds.), Narratives of educating for sustainability in unsustainable environments (pp. 219–243). Michigan State University Press.
4.
Bawaka Country includingSuchet-PearsonS.LloydK.WrightS.BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.Ganambarr-StubbsM.GanambarrB.MaymuruD.DaleyL.TofaM.HammerselyL. (in press). Bala ga’ lili: Communicating, relating and co-creating balance through relationships of reciprocity. Social and Cultural Geography.
5.
Bawaka Country including Suchet-PearsonS.WrightS.LloydK.BurarrwangaL. (2013). Caring as country: Towards an ontology of co-becoming in natural resource management. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 54(2), 185–197.
6.
Bawaka Country includingSuchet-PearsonS.WrightS.LloydK.BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.Ganambarr-StubbsM.GanambarrB.MaymuruD.SweeneyJ. (2016a). Co-becoming time/s: Time/s-as-telling-as-time/s. In ThorpeJ.RutherfordS.SandbergL. A. (Eds.), Methodological challenges in nature-culture and environmental history research (pp. 81–92). Routledge.
7.
Bawaka Country includingWrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.LloydK.BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR. (2016b). Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. Progress in Human Geography, 40(4), 455–475.
8.
Bawaka Country includingWrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.LloydK.BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.Ganambarr-StubbsM.GanambarrB.MaymuruD.GrahamM. (2019). Everything is love: Mobilising knowledges, identities, and places as Bawaka. In GombayN.Palomino-SchalschaM. (Eds.), Indigenous places and colonial spaces (pp. 51–71). Routledge.
9.
BellA. (2008). Recognition or ethics?Cultural Studies, 22(6), 850–869.
10.
BowC.NorringtonL.VerranH.ChristieM. (2020). Working with multiple knowledges in Australia’s top end. Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts, 26, 2–5.
11.
BriggM. (2016). Engaging Indigenous knowledges: From sovereign to relational knowers. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 45(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2016.5
12.
BurarrwangaL.MaymuruD.GanambarrB.WrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.LloydK. (2008). Weaving lives together at Bawaka: North East Arnhem Land. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle.
13.
CarreñoG. S. (2016). Places are kin: Food, cohabitation, and sociality in the Southern Peruvian Andes. Anthropological Quarterly, 89, 813–840. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2016.0048
14.
ChristieM. (2006). Transdisciplinary research and Aboriginal knowledge. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 35, 78–89.
15.
ConranM. (2011). They really love me!Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1454–1473.
16.
DaigleM. (2016). Awawanenitakik: The spatial politics of recognition and relational geographies of Indigenous self-determination. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 60(2), 259–269.
Gay’wu Group of Women, BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.Ganambarr-StubbsM.GanambarrB.MaymuruD.WrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.LloydK. (2019). Songspirals: Sharing women’s wisdom of Country through songlines. Allen & Unwin.
GrahamM. (1999). Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 3(2), 105–118.
HartM. A.StrakaS.RoweG. (2017). Working across contexts: Practical considerations of doing Indigenist/anti-colonial research. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416659084
24.
HernandezK. J.RubisJ. M.TheriaultN.ToddZ.MitchellA.CountryB.BurarrwangaL.GanambarrR.Ganambarr-StubbsM.GanambarrB.MaymuruD. (2020). The creatures collective: Manifestings. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), 838–863.
25.
HowittR. (2020). New Indigenous geographies. Geographical Research, 58(1), 107–114.
26.
Hughes-WarringtonM.MartinA. (2022). Big and little histories: Sizing up ethics in historiography. Routledge.
27.
HuntD. (2018). “In search of our better selves”: Totem transfer narratives and Indigenous futurities. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 42(1), 71–90.
28.
JáureguiC. A. (2016). Going native, going home: Ethnographic empathy and the artifice of return in Cabeza de Vaca’s Relación. Colonial Latin American Review, 25(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2016.1205246
29.
KanngieserA.ToddZ. (2020). From environmental case study to environmental kin study. History and Theory, 59(3), 385–393.
30.
KwaymullinaA. (2008). Introduction: A land of many countries. In MorganS.MiaT.KwaymullinaB. (Eds.), Heartsick for country: Stories of love spirit and creation (p. 5). Freemantle Press.
31.
KwaymullinaA. (2016). Research, ethics and Indigenous peoples: An Australian Indigenous perspective on three threshold considerations for respectful engagement. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(4), 437–449.
32.
LloydK.WrightS.Suchet-PearsonS.BurarrwangaL.HodgeP. (2012). Weaving lives together: Collaborative fieldwork in North East Arnhem Land, Australia / L’entrelacement des vies: Les pratiques collaboratives sur le terrain dans le Nord-Est de la terre Arnhem, Australie. Annales de Geographie, 121, 513–524.
33.
MartinK. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Post Pressed.
34.
MoralesS. (2018). Locating oneself in one’s research: Learning and engaging with law in the Coast Salish world. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 30(1), 144–168.
35.
NgurraD.DaddL.GlassP.ScottR.GrahamM.JudgeS.HodgeP.Suchet-PearsonS. (2019). Yanama budyari gumada: Reframing the urban to care as Darug Country in Western Sydney. Australian Geographer, 50(3), 279–293.
36.
RogersJ. (2018). Photostory and relatedness methodology: The beginning of an Aboriginal-Kanaka Maoli research journey (part one). Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 3–16.
37.
RoseD. B. (1996). Nourishing terrains: Australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Australian Heritage Commission.
38.
RoseD. B. (2002). Indigenous ecologies and an ethic of connection. In LowN. (Ed.), Global ethics and environment (pp. 189–201). Routledge.
39.
RoseD. B. (2007). Fiona Magowan, “Melodies of mourning: Music & emotion in Northern Australia.”Australian Humanities Review, 42, 431–445.
40.
RubisJ. M.TheriaultN. (2020). Concealing protocols: Conservation, Indigenous survivance, and the dilemmas of visibility. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(7), 962–984.
41.
SimpsonA. (2007). On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, “voice” and colonial citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue, 9, 67–80.
42.
SmithA. S.SmithN.DaleyL.WrightS.HodgeP. (2021). Creation, destruction, and COVID: Heeding the call of country, bringing things into balance. Geographical Research, 59(2), 160–168.
43.
SmithA. S.SmithN.WrightS.HodgeP.DaleyL. (2020). Yandaarra is living protocol. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(7), 940–961.
44.
TallBearK. (2014). Standing with and speaking as faith: A feminist-indigenous approach to inquiry. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), 1–7.
45.
TheriaultN.LeducT.MitchellA.RubisJ. M.Jacobs GaehowakoN. (2020). Living protocols: Remaking worlds in the face of extinction. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(7), 893–908.
46.
ToddZ. (2018). Refracting the state through human-fish relations. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 7(1), 60–75.
47.
TuckE.Gaztambide-FernándezR. A. (2013). Curriculum, replacement, and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(1), 72–89.
48.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
49.
TynanL. (2021). What is relationality? Indigenous knowledges, practices and responsibilities with kin. Cultural Geographies, 28(4), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740211029287
50.
TynanL.BishopM. (2019). Disembodied experts, accountability and refusal: An autoethnography of two (ab)Original women. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 217–231.
51.
VizenorG. (Ed.). (2008). Survivance: Narratives of native presence. University of Nebraska Press.
52.
WattsV. (2013). Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (First woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 20–34.
53.
WhiteheadA. N. (1978). Process and reality. The Free Press.
54.
WhyteK. P. (2018). Indigenous science (fiction) for the anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 224–242.
55.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
56.
WrightS. (2018). When dialogue means refusal. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(2), 128–132.
