We meditate on and talk/write about issues that arose for us during the Post Philosophy series, specifically engaging with a topic entangled within each presentation, “the new.” Quandaries that emerged for us include the post philosophical raison d’être for the new, the possibility and nature of the post philosophical new, and its ethical, ontological, and epistemological consequences. Taking the form of conversation, we provide tracings of our collaboration, with its multiple, complex plug-in points, hauntological connections, and missed calibrations—an agencement set in motion by this series as a minor gesture and fueled by our thinking-with the work of the presenters.
Bridges-RhoadsS.Van CleaveJ. (2013). Writing the torment: Aporetic data and the possibility of justice. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487872
5.
DerridaJ. (2016). Of grammatology (SpivakG. C., Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1974)
6.
De VilliersP. Y. (2010). The everyday wife. Modjaji Books.
7.
Fontanella-NothomO. (2021). “Ethical viewing practices”: First-graders experiencing racism in Let the Children March. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 70(1), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211036198
8.
HarawayD. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
9.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
10.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412471510
11.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2017). Thinking with theory: A new analytic for qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 717–737). SAGE.
12.
KoroM. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Routledge.
13.
KressG. (1995). Writing the Future: English and the making of a culture of innovation. Nate.
14.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
15.
KubyC.Fontanella-NothomO. (2018). (Re)imagining writers and writing: The end of the book and the beginning of writing. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336918786257
16.
KuntzA. M. (2021). Standing at one’s post: Post-qualitative inquiry as ethical enactment. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420932599
17.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
20.
ManningE. (2020). For a pragmatics of the useless. Duke University Press.
21.
NewfieldD.ByrneD. (2020). Towards decolonising poetry in education: The ZAPP project. Education as Change, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/7723
22.
NewfieldD.MaungedzoR. (2006). Mobilising and modalising poetry in a Soweto classroom. English Studies in Africa, 49(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138390608691344
23.
NewfieldD.SteinP. (2000). The Multiliteracies Project: South African teachers respond. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 292–310). Routledge.
24.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). Routledge.
25.
SpectorK.GuyotteK. W. (2019). Abductions. In KubyC. R.SpectorK.ThielJ. J. (Eds.), Posthumanism and literacy education: Knowing/becoming/doing literacies (pp. 214–227). Routledge.
26.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. Routledge.
27.
SteinP.NewfieldD. (2004). Shifting the gaze in South African classrooms: New pedagogies, new publics, new democracies. Thinking Classroom, 5(1), 28–36.
28.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616638694
University of Chicago, Division of the Humanities. (2021, November11). Danziger lecture 2021 with Judith Butler [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPMIrMkggmA
