This article is derived from a webinar series conversation titled, “Post Philosophies and the Doing of Inquiry.” During the webinar panelists were asked to respond to four questions:
1. How does your philosophical approach influence your ways of doing inquiry?
2. What does this philosophical approach make thinkable or possible for inquiry?
3. What are your perspectives on methodology(ies) and/or methods? How do you envision that in your approaches to doing inquiry?
4. What mechanisms could be put in place at universities to help supervisors and/or committees support students doing post philosophy inspired ways of inquiring?
FoucaultM. (1983). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In: DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., p. 231). University of Chicago Press.
2.
KuntzA. M. (2015). The responsible methodologist. Routledge.
3.
KuntzA. M. (2019). Qualitative inquiry, cartography, and the promise of material change. Routledge.
4.
KuntzA.M. (2020). Standing at one’s post: Post-qualitative inquiry as ethical enactment. Qualitative Inquiry, 27, 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420932599
5.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.
