In this essay, I describe the possibilities afforded by initial encounters with the post qual, namely through exploring the speculative and shifting from a scholastic mode of reporting toward one of being and experimenting that more closely resembles the experience of living. I trace the relief from reductionism brought by the embracing of live methods and speculative middles, and the reinvigoration that arrives with an agentic responsibility to make space in academia for a dynamic and imaginative inclusion.
AdamsE.StP. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 611–626.
2.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
3.
BerloD. K. (1960). Interaction: The goal of interpersonal communication. In BerloD. K. (Ed.), The process of communication (pp. 109–111). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4.
DeLandaM.ProteviJ.ThanemT. (2013). Deleuzian interrogations: A conversation with Manuel DeLanda and John Protevi. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 3(4), 65–88.
5.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
6.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus (MassumiB., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
7.
HallE. T. (1989). Beyond culture. Anchor. (Original work published 1976)
8.
JacksonA. Y. (2017). Thinking without method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666–674.
9.
ManningE. (2018). What things do when they shape each other [Manuscript in preparation].
10.
MarkL. (2017, July). The construction of narrative schema in acculturation and third culture building [Paper presentation]. Benedictine University at Mesa’s First International, Interdisciplinary Conference, “Identity Negotiations,”Mesa, AZ, United States.
11.
MarkL. (2019). An exploratory study of part time minorities: Finding home as a minority member. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 48, 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2019.1602071
12.
MazzeiL. A. (2003). Inhabited silences: In pursuit of a muffled subtext. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 355–368.
13.
MazzeiL. A. (2004). Silent listenings: Deconstructive practices in discourse-based research. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 26–34.
14.
McCormackD. (2013). Refrains for moving bodies: Experience and experiment in affective spaces. Duke University Press.
15.
MorrisM. (1998). Too soon too late: History in popular culture (Vol. 22). Indiana University Press.
16.
SeigworthG. J. (2000). Banality for cultural studies. Cultural Studies, 14(2), 227–268.
17.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. E. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in) tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 203–214.
18.
WellsT.MarkL.SandovalJ. (2019). Affect, space and the everyday: A reconsideration of waste in academic inquiry. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 19, Article 3.
19.
WilliamsJ. (2003). Gilles Deleuze’s “Difference and repetition”: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh University Press.
