Post qualitative research is an idea for which the time has come. How long will this last? These pages represent a tentative exploration of the (im)possibilities of post qualitative research.
AdamoS.ZanfabroG. (2019). Altre storie = Other stories: parole e immagini per raccontare le migrazioni del presente. [Words and Imagis to tell contemporary migrations]. Forum.
2.
BenozzoA. (2018). Postructuralism. In CassellC.CunliffeA.GrandyG. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research methods in business and management (pp. 86–101). SAGE.
3.
BenozzoA.BellH.Koro-LjungbergM. (2013). Moving between nuisance, splinters and secrets as data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487878
4.
BenozzoA.CareyN.CozzaM.ElmenhorstC.FairchildN.Koro-LjungbergM.TaylorC. A. (2019). Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: Post-qualitative re-turnings. Gender, Work and Organization, 26, 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12260
5.
BenozzoA.Koro-LjungbergM.CareyN. (2016). Post/authorship: Five or more IKEA customers in search of an author. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415622490
6.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy?Columbia University Press.
7.
FairchildN. (2017). Segments and stutters: Early years teachers and becoming-professional. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18, 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117731023
8.
GagliardiP. (1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565–580). SAGE.
9.
GherardiS. (2019). If we practice posthumanist research, do we need gender anymore?Gender, Work and Organizations, 26, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12328
10.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2009). Voice in qualitative research: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research. Routledge.
11.
Koro-LjungbergM.CareyN.BenozzoA. (2016, June28–July1). “Post-qualitative” methodologies (of difference) [Conference session]. 9th Biennial Gender, Work and Organization Conference at Keele University, Newcastle, UK.
PillowW. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
17.
RipamontiS.ScarattiG. (2015). Safety learning, organizational contradictions and the dynamics of safety practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27, 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2014-0007
18.
SaidE. (2000). The art of displacement: Mona Hatoum’s logic of irreconcilables. In HatoumM.SaidE.WagstaffS. (Eds.), Mona Hatoum: The entire world as a foreign land (pp. 7–17). Tate Gallery Pub.
19.
ScheurichJ. J. (1995). A postmodernist critique of research inter-viewing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080303
20.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237278
21.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (4th ed., pp. 447–479). SAGE.
