In this article, I present insurgent poetry as a way to decolonize ethnographic knowing. I argue that insurgent poetry tethered to grassroots struggles represents a critical site for decolonizing relationships in activist ethnography. My activist ethnographic work takes place alongside, and in solidarity with Miya communities in Northeast India, who have been disenfranchised and face persecution and statelessness. Presenting poems that effervesced in relation to “fieldwork,” I theorize poetry as a decolonial enactment: a form of witnessing that resists a disciplining colonial gaze and creates possibilities for decolonial onto-epistemic rupture/reorientation; in doing so, allowing for radical relationality and reciprocal knowing.
AlfredG. R. (2005). Wasase: Indigenous pathways of action and freedom. Broadview Press.
2.
Angel-AjaniA. (2006). Expert witness: Notes towards revisiting the politics of listening. In SanfordV.Angel-AjaniA. (Eds.), Engaged observer: Anthropology, advocacy, and activism (pp. 76–89). Rutgers University Press.
3.
AnzaldúaG. E. (2002). (Un)natural bridges, (un)safe spaces. In AnzaldúaG. E.KeatingA. (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 1–5). Routledge.
4.
AtallahD. G. (In Press). Reflections on radical love and rebellion: Towards decolonial solidarity in community psychology praxis. In KessiS.SufflaS.SeedatM. (Eds.), Decolonial enactments in community psychology. Springer Series in Community Psychology.
BellD. (2011). Ode to the downpressor: A psychological portrait of racism, classism, and denial in (post) colonial Jamaica [Dissertation, Pacifica Graduate Institute].
10.
BulhanH. A. (1985). Frantz Fanon and the psychology of oppression. Plenum Press.
11.
ConnellR. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2), 210–223.
12.
de Sousa SantosB. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
13.
DuttaU. (2015). The long way home: The vicissitudes of belonging and otherness in Northeast India. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 161–172.
14.
DuttaU. (2017). The everyday and the exceptional: Rethinking gendered violence and human rights in Garo Hills, India. In GrabeS. (Ed.), Women’s human rights: A social psychological perspective on resistance, liberation, and justice (pp. 179–204). Oxford University Press.
15.
DuttaU. (2020, February). Who is Indian? Implications of the National Register of Citizens and the Citizenship Amendment Act. Invited panel at India Conference at Harvard, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
16.
DuttaU. (In press). Decentering “community” in community psychology: Towards radical relationality and resistance. In KessiS.SufflaS.SeedatM. (Eds.), Decolonial enactments in community psychology. Springer Series in Community Psychology.
17.
DuttaU.SonnC. C.LykesM. B. (2016). Situating and contesting structural violence in community-based research and action. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2(2), 1–20.
18.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
19.
FaulknerS. (2007). Concern with craft: Using ars poetica as criteria for reading research poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 218–234.
20.
FelmanS.LaubD. (1992). Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. Taylor & Francis.
21.
HatleyJ. (2012). Suffering witness: The quandary of responsibility after the irreparable. SUNY Press.
22.
HirshfieldJ. (1997). Nine gates: Entering the mind of poetry. HarperCollins.
23.
HussainS. M. (2018). Poetry will belong. RLFPA Editions.
24.
JonesS. H. (1998). Turning the kaleidoscope, re-visioning an ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(3), 421–441.
KerkettaJ. (2018). Land of the roots. Bharatiya Jnanpith.
27.
KhatunS. (2018). Australianama: The South Asian Odyssey in Australia. Oxford University Press.
28.
LahmanM. K.GeistM. R.RodriguezK. L.GragliaP. E.RichardV. M.SchendelR. K. (2010). Poking around poetically: Research, poetry, and trustworthiness. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(1), 39–48.
29.
LordeA. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. The Crossing Press Feminist Series. Ten Speed Press.
30.
LugonesM. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.
31.
MalkkiL. (1997). News and culture: Transitory phenomena and the fieldwork tradition. In GuptaA.FergusonJ. (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 86–101). Duke University Press.
Martín-BaróI. (1996). Writings for a liberation psychology. Translated by AronA.CorneS. Harvard University Press.
34.
Minh-haT. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Indiana University Press.
35.
MoragaC. (2011). A Xicana codex of changing consciousness: Writings, 2000–2010. Duke University Press.
36.
MoragaC. (2015). Catching fire: Preface to the fourth edition. In MoragaC.AnzaldúaG. (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (4th ed.). (pp. 15– 26). SUNY Press.
37.
MoralesA. L. (1998). Medicine stories: History, culture, and the politics of integrity. South End Press.
38.
MurshidN. (2016). Assam and the foreigner within: Illegal Bangladeshis or Bengali Muslims?Asian Survey, 56(3), 581–604.
39.
OliverK. (2001). Witnessing: Beyond recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
40.
PérezE. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Indiana University Press.
41.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.
Reyes CruzM. (2008). What if I just cite Graciela? Working toward decolonizing knowledge through a critical ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(4), 651–658.
44.
RichardsonL. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). SAGE.
45.
RichardsonL. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. Rutgers University Press.
46.
RoweA. C.TuckE. (2017). Settler colonialism and cultural studies: Ongoing settlement, cultural production, and resistance. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(1), 3–13.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428.
51.
TuckE.McKenzieM. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
52.
UreñaC. (2016). Loving from below: Of (De)colonial love and other demons. Hypatia, 32(1), 86–102.
53.
VillenasS. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711–732.
54.
WatkinsM. (2015). Psychosocial accompaniment. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 324–341.
55.
WilsonS. (2001). What is an Indigenous research methodology?Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 175–179.
56.
WolfingerN. H. (2002). On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background expectancies. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 85–93.
