This essay presents our collective imagination of music-informed artful inquiry. Inspired by the notion that methodology can be a lifestyle choice and drawing on our experiences with collaborative music expression, we discuss three characteristics of artful thinking with/about/through music: transcendency through emotions and embodiment, connectivity for inclusivity and relationality, and resistance for reinventing decolonial beings and ethical relations. Building on these elements—and understanding artful thinking as a mode of inquiry—we attempt to envision thinking with music as artful inquiry guided by epistemological boundary-crossing, a relational ontology, and a commitment to decolonial possibilities.
BovedaM.BhattacharyaK. (2019). Love as de/colonial onto-epistemology: A post-oppositional approach to contextualized research ethics. The Urban Review, 51, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-00493-z
8.
BoyleD.Butler-KisberL. (2019). Musical memos in qualitative inquiry: Creating artful, embodied and salient reflections. The Qualitative Report, 24(2), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3504
ChangE. (2020). Researching as a critical secretary: A strategy and praxis for critical ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(10), 1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1702232
11.
ChenK. H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Duke University Press.
12.
ChowY. F.de KloetJ.SchmidtL. (2024). It’s my party: Tat Ming Pair and the postcolonial politics of popular music in Hong Kong. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6710-0
13.
ColeA. L.KnowlesJ. G. (2008). Arts-informed research. In KnowlesJ. G.ColeA. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 55–70). Sage.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1935). Does the Negro need separate schools?Journal of Negro Education, 4(3), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291871
17.
DuttaU. (2023). Reimagining the politics of belonging through counterstorytelling: A decolonial praxis of refusal and desire. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221118690
18.
FellezsK. (2019). Listen but don't ask question: Hawaiian slack key guitar across the Transpacific. Duke University Press.
19.
FinleyS. (2014). An introduction to critical arts-based research: Demonstrating methodologies and practices of a radical ethical aesthetic. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(6), 531–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708614548123
20.
FinleyS. (2018). Critical arts-based inquiry: Performances of resistance politics. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 561–575). Sage.
21.
FlintM. A.ToledoW. (2021). Beyond the visual: Artful inquiry in higher education journals 2000–2020. The Review of Higher Education, 45(2), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2021.0022
22.
FraleighS. H.HansteinP. (Eds.). (1998). Researching dance: Evolving modes of inquiry. University of Pittsburgh Press.
23.
FreemanM. (2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative research. Routledge.
GoodingE. D.YamaneM.SalterB. (2021). “People have courage!”: Protest music and indigenous movements. Comparative American Studies: An International Journal, 18(3), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2021.2008223
26.
GooleyD. (2011). The outside of “sitting in”: Jazz jam sessions and the politics of participation. Performance Research, 16(3), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2011.606024
27.
GouzouasisP. (2018). A/r/tographic inquiry in a new totality. In LeavyP. (Ed.), Handbook of arts-based research (pp. 233–246). The Guilford Press.
28.
hoʻomanawanuik. (2006). From ocean to O-shen: Reggae, rap, and hip hop in Hawaiʻi. In MilesT.HollandS. (Eds.), Crossing waters, crossing worlds: The African diaspora in Indian Country (pp. 273–308). Duke University Press.
KimJ. (2022). Settler Garrison: Debt imperialism, militarism, and transpacific imaginaries. Duke University Press.
31.
KruseN. B. (2018). The jumping flea diaspora: An ethnographic exploration of music and culture in a Hawaiian ‘ukulele club. Music Education Research, 20(5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2018.1516745
32.
KutschkeB.NortonB. (Eds.). (2013). Music and protest in 1968. Cambridge University Press.
33.
LeavyP. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. The Guilford Press.
34.
LeeS. Y.SonM.KimT.JungJ. K.JangS. B. (2024). Methodologizing transnationality: Relational writing as collective inquiry. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 24(2), 97–110.
35.
LevitinD. J. (2007). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. Plume.
36.
ManningE. (2016). Ten propositions for research-creation. In ColinN.SachsenmaierS. (Eds.), Collaboration in performance practice (pp. 133–141). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462466_7
37.
Marsilli-VargasX. (2022). Genres of listening: An ethnography of psychoanalysis in Buenos Aires. Duke University Press.
ShahjahanR. A. (2020, July16). What kind of “methodological lifestyle” do you want as a scholar?—Being lazy and slowing down. Being Lazy and Slowing Down—Be Mindful, Trust the Process, Let Go of Outcomes. https://lazyslowdown.com/methodological-lifestyle/
44.
ShannonD. B.TrumanS. E. (2020). Problematizing sound methods through music research-creation: Oblique curiosities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920903224
SilvaN. (2014). Ke kū‘ē kūpa‘a loa nei K/Mākou (We most solemnly protest): A memoir of 1998. In Goodyear-Ka‘ōpuaN. I.HusseyWrightE. K. (Eds.), A nation rising: Hawaiian movements for life, land, and sovereignty (pp. 303–311). Duke University Press.
47.
SimpsonA. (2014). Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Duke University Press.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research 4 (4th ed., pp. 611–626). Sage.
50.
SweetJ. D.NurminenE.Koro-LjungbergM. (2020). Becoming research with shadow work: Combining artful inquiry with research-creation. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3–4), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419857764
TraskH.-K. (1999). From a native daughter: Colonialism and sovereignty in Hawai’i (rev. ed.). University of Hawai’i Press.
53.
TrumanS. E. (2023). Undisciplined: Research-creation and what it may offer (traditional) qualitative research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221098380
54.
TuckE.McKenzieM. (2015). Relational validity and the “where” of inquiry: Place and land in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563809
55.
van VenrooijA.MillerC.SchmutzV. (2022). Race and genre ambiguity in the critical reception of popular music. Sociological Inquiry, 92(2), 568–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12470
56.
WalshD. (2012). Rez riddims: Reggae and American Indians. In HoffmanE. D. (Ed.), American Indians and popular culture: Literature, arts, and resistance (pp.241–254, Vol. 2). Praeger.
57.
WarrenC. A.HotchkinsB. K. (2015). Teacher education and the enduring significance of “false empathy.”Urban Review, 47(2), 266–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0292-7
