Recounting an experience that he had while researching the drawing practice of a three-year-old student, Anna, the author of this article attempts to linger with those subtle yet potent values that he and she accumulated over time and that they elected to remember, curate, wield, and ultimately fashion toward one another in order to institute the kind of change, resistance, understanding, and affirmation that was desired from one moment to the next. In doing so, the author of this article leverages into play an incessant questioning of how and why one’s pedagogical composition materializes and the extent to which it concerns itself with everyday life.
DaviesB. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. London, England: Routledge.
7.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (2007). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
ElkinsJ. (1996). The object stares back: On the nature of seeing. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
10.
FoucaultM. (1985). The history of sexuality: The use of pleasure. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
11.
GaroianC. (2013). The prosthetic pedagogy of art: Embodied research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
HarawayD. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In GrossbergL.NelsonC.TreichlerP. (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York, NY: Routledge.
MalaguzziL. (1993). Your image of the child: Where education begins. Child Care Information Exchange, 3(94), 52-56.
15.
ManningE. (2012). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. London, England: SAGE.
17.
ReadingsB. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
SchulteC. M. (2013). Being there and becoming-unfaithful. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 14(SI 1.5). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v14si1/
19.
St. PierreE. A. (2012) Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 283-296.
20.
St. PierreE. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 223-227.
21.
Van ManenM. (1992). Reflectivity and the pedagogical moment: The normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 507-536.
22.
Van ManenM. (2008). Pedagogical sensitivity and teachers practical knowing-in-action. Peking University Education Review (1), 2-20.
23.
WhiteheadA. N. (1927). Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. New York, NY: Macmillan.
24.
WillsD. (1995). Prosthesis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
WilsonB. (1974). One view of the past and future of aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 8(3), 59-67.
