This article identifies practices in qualitative interviews that evoke research participant reflexivity and change. By engaging interviews in a dialogic manner, researchers can encourage participant perspective-taking and non-judgmental involvement that can lead to flickers of transformation. The study draws on empirical material from three different projects to locate critical incidents of dialogic interviewing. We propose a typology of dialogic interviewing strategies that accompany reflexivity—namely, (a) probing questions, (b) member reflections, and (c) counterfactual prompting. These strategies illustrate the transformative power of dialogic interviewing and serve as a guide for researchers who desire their interviews to not only be methods for gathering knowledge but also methods for intervention and critical reflection.
AshforthB. E.KrienerG. E. (1999). “How can you do it?”: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24, 413-434. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2202129
2.
BargeJ. K. (2002). Enlarging the meaning of group deliberation: From discussion to dialogue. In FreyL. R. (Eds.), New directions in group communication (pp. 159-177). London, England: SAGE.
3.
BloorM. (2001). Techniques of validation in qualitative research: A critical commentary. In EmersonR. M. (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 383-396). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
4.
BolerM. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BuberM. (1958). I and thou. New York, NY: Scribner.
6.
CormanS.TretheweyA.GoodallH. L.Jr. (2007). A 21st century model for communication in the global war of ideas: From simplistic influence to pragmatic complexity. Consortium for Strategic Communication. Retrieved from http://csc.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdf/114.pdf
7.
CunliffeA. L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56, 983-1003. doi:0.1177/00187267030568004
8.
CunliffeA. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40, 87-101. doi:10.1177/1350507608099315
9.
DenzinN. K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1, 23-46. doi:10.1177/146879410100100102
10.
DerridaJ. (1982). Margins of philosophy (BassA., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1972)
11.
ErardM. (2007). Um . . .: Slips, stumbles, and verbal blunders and what they mean. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
12.
FlechaA.PulidoC.ChristouM. (2011). Transforming violent selves through reflection in critical communicative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 246-255. doi:10.1177/1077800410397803
13.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory. London, England: Macmillan.
14.
GómezA.PuigvertL.FlechaR. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 235-245. doi:10.1177/1077800410397802
15.
GrossbergL. (1982). Does communication theory need intersubjectivity? Toward an immanent philosophy of interpersonal relations. In BurgoonM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 171-205). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
16.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2003). Postmodern interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
HolsteinJ.GubriumJ. (1997). Active interviewing. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 140-161). London, England: SAGE.
18.
HydeB.BinehamJ. L. (2000). From debate to dialogue: Toward a pedagogy of nonpolarized public discourse. The Southern Communication Journal, 65, 208-223. doi:10.1080/10417940009373168
19.
JohannessenR. L. (1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 373-382. doi:10.1080/00335637109383082
20.
KahanD. M.PetersE.DawsonE. C.SlovicP. (2013, September). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government (Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper 307). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2319992
21.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (2000). Participatory action research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567-605). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
StarbuckW. H.MillikenF. J. (1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In HambrickD.C. (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35–65). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
SunWolf. (2002). Getting to “Groupaha!”: Provoking creative processes in task groups. In FreyL. R. (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 203-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
TracyS. J. (2005). Locking up emotion: Moving beyond dissonance for understanding emotion labor discomfort. Communication Monographs, 72, 261-283. doi:10.1080/03637750500206474
32.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837-851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
33.
TracyS. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
TracyS. J.RiveraK. D. (2010). Endorsing equity and applauding stay-at-home moms: How male voices on work-life reveal aversive sexism and flickers of transformation. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 13-43. doi:10.1177/0893318909352248
35.
TracyS. J.TretheweyA. (2005). Fracturing the real-self ↔ fake self dichotomy: Moving toward “crystallized” organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 15, 168-195. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00331.x
36.
WatzlawickP.BavelasJ. B.JacksonD. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
37.
WayA. K. (2012). Apprentices & worker bees: Discursive constructions of youth’s work identity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
38.
WayD.TracyS. J. (2012). Conceptualizing compassion as recognizing, relating and (re)acting: A qualitative study of compassionate communication at hospice. Communication Monographs, 79, 292-315. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.697630
39.
WeickK. E. (1989). Organized improvisation: 20 years of organizing. Communication Studies, 40, 241-248. doi:10.1080/10510978909368277
40.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
WogelmuthJ. R.DonohueR. (2006). Toward an inquiry of discomfort: Guiding transformation in “emancipatory” narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 1022-1039. doi:10.1177/1077800406288629
