The article presents a notion of “analyzing in the present” as a source of inspiration in analyzing qualitative research materials. The term emerged from extensive listening to interview recordings during everyday commuting to university campus. Paying attention to the way different parts of various interviews conveyed diverse significance to the listening researcher at different times became a method of continuously opening up the empirical material in a reflexive, breakdown-oriented process of analysis. We argue that situating analysis in the present of analyzing emphasizes and acknowledges the interdependency between researcher and researched. On this basis, we advocate an explicit “open-state-of mind” listening as a key aspect of analyzing qualitative material, often described only as a matter of reading transcribed empirical materials, reading theory, and writing. The article contributes to an ongoing methodological conversation problematizing the notion of “data” and the use of “data-reliant” methods of analysis.
AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2011). Qualitative research and theory development: Mystery as method. London, England: SAGE.
2.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BirdC. M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 226-248. doi:10.1177/1077800404273413
4.
BrinkmannS. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in everyday life: Working with everyday life materials. London, England: SAGE.
5.
BrinkmannS. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 720-725.
6.
Cooper-ThomasH. D.BurkeS. E. (2012). Newcomer proactive behavior: Can there be too much of a good thing? In WanbergC. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 56-77). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
DaftR. L.WeickK. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
8.
EliasN. (2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations (DunningE.GoudsblomJ.MennellS., Eds.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (This edition first published 1994)
9.
FeldmanD. C. (2012). The impact of socializing newcomers on insiders. In WanbergC. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 215-229). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
FenwickT.EdwardsR.SawchukP. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
11.
FlahertyM.FineG. A. (2001). Present, past, and future: Conjugating George Herbert Mead’s perspective on time. Time & Society, 10, 147-161.
12.
FlyvbjergB. (2011). Case study. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 301-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
GriffinD. (2002). The emergence of leadership: Linking self-organization and ethics. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
14.
HansenT.LevineJ. M. (2009). Newcomers as change agents: Effects of newcomers’ behavioral style and teams’ performance optimism. Social Influence, 4, 46-61.
15.
HasseC. (2011). Kulturanalyse i organisationer. Begreber, metoder og forbløffende læreprocesser [Culture analysis in organizations. Concepts, methods and surprising processes of learning]. Copenhagen, DK: Samfundslitteratur.
16.
JegatheesanB. I. (2005). I see the stars: An autoethnographer speaks on fieldwork and flashbacks. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 667-688. doi:10.1177/1077800405276810
17.
JoasH. (2005). The creativity of action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (This edition first published 1996)
18.
LapadatJ.LindsayA. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 64-86.
19.
LaveJ.KvaleS. (1995). What is anthropological research? An interview with Jean Lave by Steiner Kvale. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 219-228.
20.
LevineJ. M.ChoiH.-S.MorelandR. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In PaulusP. B.NijstadB. A. (Eds.), Group creativity, innovation through collaboration (pp. 202-224). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (MorrisC. W., Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
MeadG. H. (2002). The philosophy of the present. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1932)
23.
MowlesC. (2011). Rethinking management: Radical insights from the complexity sciences. Farham, UK: Gower.
24.
PeliasR. J. (2013). Writing into position: Strategies for composition and evaluation. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (4th ed., pp. 547-568). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
PeräkyläA.RuusuvuoriJ. (2011). Analyzing talk and text. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 529-543). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
RevsbækL. (2011). Medarbejderintroduktion–Et bidrag til organisatorisk innovation [Employee induction: A contribution to organizational innovation]. In StegeagerN.LaursenE. (Eds.), Organisationer i bevægelse. Copenhagen, DK: Samfundslitteratur.
27.
RevsbækL. (2013a). Modtagelsessamspillets lokale økologi [The ecology of entry]. Academic Quarter, Humanistic Leadership Research, 6, 175-186.
28.
RevsbækL. (2013b, February). Researching organizational entry from a perspective of newcomer innovation. Conference paper, the annual DGfE Commission of Organizational Education Conference, Marburg, Germany.
29.
RevsbækL. (2014). Adjusting to the Emergent. A process theory perspective on organizational socialization and newcomer innovation. Aalborg, DK: Aalborg University Press.
30.
RichardsonL.St. PierreE. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
SaksA. M.GrumanJ. A. (2012). Getting newcomers on board: A review of socialization practices and introduction to socialization resources theory. In WanbergC. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
SpringsteenB. (1987). Tunnel of Love [Studio album]. New York, NY: CBS Records.
33.
StaceyR. (2012). Tools and techniques of leadership and management: Meeting the challenge of complexity. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
34.
StaceyR. D. (2010). Complexity and organizational reality: Uncertainty and the need to rethink management after the collapse of investment capitalism (2nd ed.). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
35.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189.
36.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-625). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
TanggaardL. (2013). Troubling methods in qualitative inquiry and beyond. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 1-99.
38.
TilleyS. A. (2003). “Challenging” research practices: Turning a critical lens on the work of transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 750-773. doi:10.1177/1077800403255296
39.
TurnerJ. H. (1987). Toward a sociological theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 52, 15-27.
40.
Van MaanenJ.ScheinE. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
