This article brings psychosocial methods into conversation with methodological and ethical debates arising from the reuse of qualitative research material, and with issues of ethnographic practice. Our empirical grounding came from the psychosocial technique of reading research texts aloud in a group, listening in an affectively attuned way, and sharing our responses. The texts we revisited—infant observation notes of interactions between a young mother and her baby—were originally gathered for the Becoming a Mother project. We identified affectively dense and compelling episodes in the data and, as we detail with examples, examined the textual sources of the experienced meanings and affects that these events evoked in group members. We discuss the epistemological and ethical complexities and challenges of this approach to the archiving and reuse of qualitative empirical material and show how the process of slow, affectively attuned reading of field notes and interviews may enrich qualitative research practices.
AndrewsM. (2008). Never the last word: Revisiting data. In AndrewsM.SquireC.TamboukouM. (Eds.), Doing narrative research (pp. 86-101). London, UK: SAGE.
2.
BereswillM.MorgenrothC. (2010). The depth hermeneutic approach in cultural and media analysis: A conversation with Ulrike Prokop. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 15, 302-314.
3.
BereswillM.MorgenrothC.RedmanP. (2010). Alfred Lorenzer and the depth hermeneutic method. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 15, 221-250.
4.
BickE. (1964). Notes on infant observation in psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 45, 628-645.
5.
ClarkeS.HoggettP. (2009). Researching beneath the surface: A psycho-social approach to research practice and method. In ClarkeS.HoggettP. (Eds.), Researching beneath the surface: Psycho-social research methods in practice (pp. 1-26). London, UK: Karnac.
6.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
CvetkovichA. (2003). An archive of feelings: Trauma, sexuality and lesbian public cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
EmersonR. M. (2007). Key incidents. In SealeC.GoboG.GubriumJ. F.SilvermanD. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 427-442). London, UK: SAGE.
10.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
EvansT.ThaneP. (2006). Secondary analysis of Dennis MarsdenMothers Alone. Methodological Innovations Online, 1(2). Retrieved from http://erdt.plymouth.ac.uk/mionline/public _html/viewarticle.php?id=31
12.
FreshwaterH. (2003). The allure of the archive. Poetics Today, 24, 729-758.
13.
FroshS.BaraitserL. (2008). Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 13, 346-365.
HammersleyM. (2010). Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues. Sociological Research Online, 15(1), 5.
16.
HemmingsC. (2005). Invoking affect. Cultural Studies, 19, 548-567.
HollwayW. (2008). The importance of relational thinking in the practice of psycho-social research: Ontology, epistemology, methodology, and ethics. In ClarkeS.HoggettP.HahnH. (Eds.), Object relations and social relations (pp. 137-162). London, UK: Karnac.
20.
HollwayW. (in press). Infant observation: Opportunities, threats, challenges. Journal of Infant Observation.
MorgenrothC. (2010). The research relationship, enactments and “countertransference” analysis: On the significance of scenic understanding. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 15, 267-280.
27.
NielsenH. B. (1995). Seductive texts with serious intentions. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 4-12.
28.
OgdenT. H. (1998). A question of voice in poetry and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67, 426-448.
29.
OgdenT. H. (1999). “The music of what happens” in poetry and psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80, 979-994.
30.
OgdenT. H. (2004). On holding and containing, being and dreaming. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 1349-1364.
31.
OgdenT. H. (2009). Rediscovering psychoanalysis: Thinking and feeling, learning and forgetting. London, UK: Routledge.
32.
PossickC. (2009). Reflexive positioning in a politically sensistive situation: Dealing with the threats of researching the West Bank Settler experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 859-875.
RicoeurP. (1991). What is a text? In ValdesM. J. (Ed.), A Ricoeur reader: Reflections and imaginations (p.195-199). New York, NY: Harvester/Wheatsheaf. (Original work published 1970)
35.
RiessmanC. K. (2004). A thrice told tale: new readings of an old story. In HurwitzB.GreenhalghT.SkultansV. (Eds.), Narrative research in health and illness (pp. 309-324). London, UK: Blackwell.
36.
RosaldoR. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
RosenthalG. (1998). The holocaust in three generations: Families of victims and perpetrators of the Nazi regime. London, UK: Cassells.
38.
SanjekR., (Ed.). (1990). Fieldnotes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
SteedmanC. (2002). Dust: The archive and cultural history. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41.
UrwinC. (2007). Doing infant observation differently? Researching the formation of mothering identities in an inner London borough. International Journal of Infant Observation and its Applications, 10, 239-252.
42.
UrwinC.SternbergJ. (Eds.). (2011). Infant observation and research: Emotional processes in everyday lives. London, UK: Karnac.
43.
WalkerdineV.LuceyH.MelodyJ. (2001). Growing up girl: Psycho-social explorations of gender and class. London, UK: Palgrave.
44.
WengrafT. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: SAGE.
45.
WetherellM. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London, UK: SAGE.
46.
WinnicottD. W. (1956). Primary maternal preoccupation. In Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis (pp. 300-305). London, UK: Hogarth.
