This article recounts the authors’ experiences at the Authentic Voices of America summer camp for severely disabled youths who are learning to become more proficient at using computerized communication devices to speak. The five-day camp was founded by Jon Feucht, who also uses a device and continues to serve as its director. In the summer of 2011, Feucht invited sociologist Ron Berger to attend the camp as part of a collaborative research project about Feucht’s life story. This article is written in Berger’s voice, but includes excerpts from Feucht’s “Straight Talks” that he gave at the camp as well as his views about living with a severe disability. By way of conclusion, insights from critical disability studies and crip theory are also considered.
BakerB. (2005). Let’s not go back to the Flintstones. Speak Up,20(2), 13. Retrieved from www.ussaac.org
3.
BarnesC.MercerG. (2001). Disability culture: Assimilation or inclusion? In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 515-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BarnesC.SheldonA. (2010). Disability, politics and poverty in a majority world context. Disability and Society, 25, 771-782.
5.
BergerR. J. (2003). Pushing forward: Disability, basketball, and me. Qualitative Inquiry,10, 794-810.
6.
BergerR. J. (2009). Hoop dreams on wheels: Disability and the competitive wheelchair athlete. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BuryM. (2000). On chronic illness and disability. In BirdC. E.ConradP.FremontA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of medical sociology (5th ed., pp. 173-183). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
CaetonD. A. (2011). Choice of a lifetime: Disability, feminism, and reproductive rights. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(1). Retrieved from www.dsq-sds.org
9.
ClarkeK.McConachieH.PriceK.WoodP. (2001). Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 107-115.
10.
DealM. (2003). Disabled people’s attitudes toward other impairment groups: A hierarchy of impairments. Disability and Society, 18, 897-910.
11.
FeuchtJ. (2003). The tan car. Parker, CO: Profitable.
12.
FeuchtJ. (2005a). In the camp of depression (interview by R. Ellenson). Speak Up, 20(2), 13. Retrieved from www.ussaac.org
13.
FeuchtJ. (2005b). Straight talks from my desk. Parker, CO: Profitable.
14.
FladJ.BergerR. J.FeuchtJ. (2011). Can you hear me now? Augmentative communication, methodological empowerment, and the life story of Jon Feucht. Disability Studies Quarterly. 31(4).
15.
GilsonS. F.DePoyE. (2000). Multiculturalism and disability: A critical perspective. Disability and Society, 15, 207-217.
16.
GlennE. N. (2010). Forced to care: Coercion and caregiving. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HarrisJ. (2010). The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disability and Society, 25, 427-439.
18.
HillK.RomichB. (2002). A rate index for augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Speech Technology, 5, 57-64.
19.
HodgeS. (2007). Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disability and Society, 22, 457-471.
20.
HughesB.PatersonK. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability and Society, 12, 325-340.
21.
JacobsB.DrewR.OgletreeB. T.PierceK. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) for adults with severe aphasia: Where we stand and how we can go further. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1231-1240.
22.
JuetteM.BergerR. J. (2008). Wheelchair warrior: Gangs, disability, and basketball. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
23.
KittayE. F.KittayE. K. (Eds.). (2002). The subject of care: Feminist perspectives on dependency. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
LaskerJ. P.BedrosianJ. L. (2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 141-153.
25.
LitvakS.EndersA. (2001). Support systems: The interface between individuals and environments. In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies. (pp. 711-733) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
McRuerR. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.
27.
McRuerR. (2010). Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence. In DavisL. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (3rd ed.) (pp. 383-392). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
MeyerM. H. (Ed.). (2000). Care work: Gender, class, and the welfare state. New York, NY: Routlege.
29.
MillerF.BachrachS. J. (1995). Cerebral palsy: A complete guide for caregiving. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
MillerN. B.SammonsC. C. (1999). Everybody’s different: Understanding and changing our reactions to disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
31.
National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1999). Bridges to student success: Exemplary programs. Washington, DC: NASPA.
32.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
PapadimitriouC. (2001). From dis-ability to difference: Conceptual and methodological issues in the study of physical disability. In ToombsS. K. (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 475-492). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
34.
PapadimitriouC. (2008). The “I” of the beholder: Phenomenological seeing in disability research. Sport, Ethics, and Philosophy, 2, 216-233.
35.
PincusF. L. (2011). Understanding diversity: An introduction to class, race, gender, sexual orientation and disability (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
36.
RaineyS. S. (2011). Love, sex and disability: The pleasures of care. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
37.
SaxtonM. (1998). Disability rights and selective abortion. In SolinerR. (Ed.), Abortion wars: A half-century of struggle,1950-2000 (pp. 374-393). Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
SchrinerK. (2001). A disability studies perspective on employment issues and policies for disabled people: An international view. In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 642-662). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
ShakespeareT. (2010). The social model of disability. In DavisL. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 266-273). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
ShapiroJ. P. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Times Books.
41.
SherryM. (2004). Overlaps and contradictions between queer theory and disability studies. Disability and Society, 19, 769-783.
42.
SiebersT. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
43.
Texas Statewide Leadership for Autism. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication. Texas guide for effective teaching: Augmentative and alternative communication. Retrieved from www.txautism.net
44.
ThomasC. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability and Society, 19, 569-583.
45.
WeissG. (1999). Body images: Embodiment as intercorporeality. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
WendellS. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York, NY: Routledge.
