This article draws on the articulation of a value for reflexivity that has accumulated within qualitative methods debates in the past decade. It demonstrates how reflexivity is interwoven with the concept of ethical mindfulness. The argument has developed from a consideration of the ethical dilemmas that were a salient aspect of an ongoing research relationship with children and young people during an unusually long longitudinal study, undertaken from the time the 10 participants were aged three to seventeen. The study explores the ongoing creation of a personal self during this time and draws on a range of ethnographic methods. The author focuses on two aspects of the “ethics in practice” that imbued her research relationships: the gaining and maintaining of consent, and the matching of methods to children’s interests. The author makes a series of recommendations about how to do reflexivity, incorporating a set of guidelines for informed consent with children. The author concludes that reflexivity and ethical mindfulness are interdependent concepts, an understanding that is particularly valuable for child-focused researchers.
AldersonP. (1995). Listening to children: Children, ethics and social research. Barkingside, UK: Barnardo’s.
2.
AtkinsonP. (1990). The ethnographic imagination: Textual construction of reality. London: Routledge.
3.
BarkerJ.WellerS. (2003). “Is it fun?” Developing children-centred research methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1), 33-58.
BroomA.HandK.ToveyP. (2009). The role of gender, environment, and individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(1), 51-65.
10.
BrownJ. (2006). Reflexivity in the research process: Psychoanalytic observations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(3), 181-197.
11.
CoffeyA. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: SAGE.
12.
ConnollyA. (2008). Challenges of generating qualitative data with socially excluded young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(3), 201-214.
13.
ChristensenP.JamesA. (2000). Research with children. Perspectives and practices. London: Falmer.
14.
DoucetA.MauthnerN. (2002). Knowing responsibly: Linking ethics, research practice and epistemology. In MauthnerM.BirchM.JessopJ.MillerT. (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 123–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
EllingsonL. L. (1998) “Then you know how i feel”: Empathy, identification and reflexivity in fieldwork (pp. 123–145). Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 492-514.
16.
EllisC. (2007). Telling Secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3-29.
17.
EpsteinD. (1998). “Are you a girl or are you a teacher?” The least adult role in research about gender and sexuality in primary school. In WalfordG. (Ed.), Doing research about education (pp. 27–41). London: Falmer.
18.
EtheringtonK. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 598-616.
19.
GallagherM. (2009). Ethics. In TisdalK. M.DavisJ. M.GalagherM. (Eds.), Researching with children and young people (pp. 11–64). London: SAGE.
20.
GreeneS.HoganD. (2005). Researching children’s experience: Approaches and methods. London: SAGE.
21.
GuilleminM.GillamL. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 261-280.
22.
HardingS. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In AlcoffL.PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York: Routledge.
23.
HollandJ. (2007). Emotions and research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(3), 195-209.
24.
HollandJ.ThomsonR.HendersonS. (2006). Qualitative longitudinal research: A discussion paper (Families and Social Capital, ESRC Research GroupWorking Paper No. 21). Swindon, UK: ESRC.
25.
HuntJ. (1989). Psychoanalytic aspects of fieldwork. London: SAGE.
26.
KleinmanS.CoppM. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
27.
LangfordW.LewisC.SolomonY.WarinJ. (2001). Understanding families? Closeness, authority and independence in mothers, fathers and 11-16 year olds. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
28.
LewisR. (2009). Recruiting parents and children into a research project: A qualitative exploration of families’ decision-making processes. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(50), 405-419.
29.
LewisV.KellettM.RobinsonC.FraserA.DingS. (2004). The reality of research with children and young people. London: SAGE.
30.
LewisA.LindsayG. (Eds.). (1999). Researching children’s perspectives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
31.
LincolnY. S. (2010). “What a long, strange trip it’s been . . .”: Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 3-9.
32.
LindsayG. (2000). Researching children’s perspectives: Ethical issues. In LewisA.LindsayG. (Eds.), Researching children’s perspectives (pp. 3–20). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33.
LuceyH. (2001). Working with emotions. In WalkerdineV.LuceyH.MelodyJ. (Eds.), Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class (pp. 83–107). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
34.
MacbethD. (2001). On “reflexivity’ in qualitative research: Two readings and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 35-68.
35.
MauthnerN. S.DoucetA. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37, 413-431.
36.
MorganD. H. (1981). Men, masculinity and the process of sociological enquiry. In RobertsH. (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 83–113). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
37.
NichollsR. (2009). Research and indigenous participation: Critical reflexive methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(2), 117-126.
38.
NutbrownC. (Ed.). (2002). Research studies in early childhood education. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
39.
O’KaneC. (2000). The development of participatory techniques: Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In ChristensenP.JamesA. (Eds.), Research with children (pp. 136–159). London: Falmer.
40.
Raphael ReedL. (1996). Educational research in Britain: Power and method. Paper presented at BERA 1996, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
41.
ReinharzS. (1997). Who am I? The need for a variety of selves in the field. In HertzR. (Ed.), Reflexivity and voice (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
RenoldE.HollandS.RossN. J.HillmanA. (2008). “Becoming participant”: Problematizing “informed consent” in participatory research with young people in care. Qualitative Social Work, 7, 427.
Siraj-BlatchfordI.Siraj-BlatchfordJ. (2001). “An ethnographic approach to researching young children’s learning.” In MacNaughtonG.RolfeS. A.Siraj-BlatchfordI. (Eds.), Doing early childhood research. International perspectives and practice (pp. 193–207). Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
45.
SmithJ. A.EatoughV. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In LyonsE.CoyleA. (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35–50). London: SAGE.
46.
SpenderD. (1981). Men’s studies modified: Impact of feminism on the academic disciplines. New York, NY: Elsevier.
47.
StanleyL.WiseS. (2002). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. London: Routledge.
48.
SwainJ. (2006). An ethnographic approach to researching children in junior school. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(3), 199-213.
49.
ThomsonR.PlumridgeL.HollandJ. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: A developing methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 6(3), 185-187.
50.
ThorneB. (1980). “You still takin’ notes?” Fieldwork and problems of informed consent. Social Problems, 27(3), 284-297.
51.
TisdallK. M.DavisJ. M.GalagherM. (2009). Researching with children and young people. London: SAGE.
52.
WalkerdineV.LuceyH.MelodyJ. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
53.
WarinJ. (2010). Stories of self: Tracking children’s identity and wellbeing through the school years. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
54.
WarinJ.SolomonY.LewisC. (2007). Swapping stories, comparing plots: Representing multiple perspectives in family interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 121-134.
55.
WarinJ.SolomonY.LewisC.LangfordW. (1999). Fathers, work, and family life. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
