This article is an analysis of “relation” in qualitative research. The analysis emerges from consideration of feminist philosophies of ethics and epistemologies, including Code's moral epistemology, and exemplars of qualitative research by Duneier and Lather and Smithies. The central argument of the article is that the quality of qualitative research reflects the quality of relation developed between the researcher and researched as “knowing subjects.” The article shows the implications of a turn to relation as following these themes: the commitment to knowing to care, engendering multiple relations, illusions of closeness, and representation of relational knowing.
Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York: Routledge.
2.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
3.
Duneier, M. (1992). Slim's table: Race, respectability and masculinity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
5.
Egan, G. (1986). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6.
Fine, M. (1991). Framingdropouts:Notes on the politics of an urbanpublichigh school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Gunzenhauser, M. G. (1999). Knowledge claims and ethical commitments: Toward a moral epistemology for critical ethnography in education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
9.
Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2003). Solidarity and risk in Welch's feminist ethics. In E. S. Fletcher (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2002: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 101-109). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
10.
Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2004). Promising rhetoric for postcritical ethnography. In G. W. Noblit, S. Y. Flores, & E. G. Murillo, Jr. (Eds.), Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique (pp. 77-94). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11.
Haig-Brown, C. (1995). Taking control: Power and contradiction in first nations adult education. Vancouver, WA: UBC Press.
12.
Howe, K. R. (1998). The interpretive turn and the new debate in education.Educational Researcher, 27(8), 13-20.
13.
Hoy, D. C. (2004). Critical resistance: From poststructuralism to post-critique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 279-313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern.New York: Routledge.
16.
Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
Levinson, B. A. (1998). (How) can a man do feminist ethnography of education?Qualitative Inquiry, 4(3), 337-370.
18.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
MacLeod, J. (1995). Ain’t no makin’it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20.
Marcus, G. (1995). The redesign of ethnography after the critique of its rhetoric. In R. F. Goodman & W. R. Fisher (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge: Reflections across the disciplines (pp. 103-121). Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
Noblit, G. W. (1999). The possibilities of postcritical ethnographies: An introduction to this issue.Educational Foundations,13(1), 3-6.
22.
Noblit, G. W., Flores, S. Y., & Murillo, E. G., Jr. (Eds.). (2004). Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
23.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Quantz, R. (1992). On critical ethnography (with some postmodern considerations). In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Goetz (Eds.), The handbookof qualitative research in education(pp. 447-505). San Diego: Academic Press.
25.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge.
26.
Smith, J. K., & Deemer, D. K. (2003). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitativematerials (2nded., pp. 427-457). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Sommer, D. (1994). Resistant texts and incompetent readers.Poetics Today,15(4), 523-551.
28.
Sommer, D. (2000). Attitude, its rhetoric. In M. Garber, B. Hanssen, & R. L. Walkowitz (Eds.), The turn to ethics (pp. 201-220). New York: Routledge.
29.
Spivak, G. C. (1988).Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
30.
St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
31.
Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Verducci, S. (1999). Moral empathy: The necessity of intersubjectivity and dialogic confirmation. In S. Tozer (Ed.), Philosophy of education 1998: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 335-343). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
34.
Welch, S. D. (2000). A feminist ethic of risk (other feminist voices). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
35.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
