Focus groups are a useful method for sociological research because the sociable interaction that is generated can yield rich insight into people’s life worlds. This is because the nature of the talk that is generated in focus groups is a mixture of personal beliefs and available collective narratives that are further flavored by the local circumstances of participants’ lives. The interactions between participantsin focus group discussions characteristically comprise layers of talk and present researchers with complex analytical tasks. In addition to what participants say about themselves, analysis and interpretation of focus group data must pay attention to the content and form of interaction between participants. This article discusses and illustrates how sociable interactions from focus groups were analyzed for insights into classed contexts for romantic relationships.
Agar, M., & MacDonald, J. (1995). Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization, 54, 78-86.
2.
Beck, U.,& Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
3.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1996). Individualization and “precarious freedoms”: Perspectives and controversies of a subject-orientated sociology. In P. Heelas, S. Lash, & P. Morris (Eds.), Detraditionalization: Critical reflections on authority and identity (pp. 23-48). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4.
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London: Sage.
5.
Cancian, F. (1987). Love in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
7.
Coreil, J. (1995). Group interview methods in community health research. Medical Anthropology, 16, 193-210.
8.
Delli Carpini, M., & Williams, B. (1994). The method is the message: Focus groups as a methodofsocial psychological and political inquiry. Researchin Micropolitics, 4, 57-85.
9.
Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1993). Love and intimacy: The gender division of emotion and “emotion work.”Sociology, 27, 221-241.
10.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social science fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Frey, J., & Fontana, A. (1993). The group interview in social research. In D. Morgan & R. Kreuger (Eds.), Successful focus groups (pp. 20-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities, 3, 275-297.
13.
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
Green, J., & Hart, L. (1999). The impact of context on data. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 21-35). London: Sage.
17.
Illouz, E. (1997a). Consuming the romantic utopia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Illouz, E. (1997b). Who will care for the caretaker’s daughter? Toward a sociology of happiness in the era of reflexive modernity. Theory, Culture & Society, 14, 31-66.
19.
Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
20.
Jarrett, R. (1993). Focus group interviewing with low-income minority populations. In D. Morgan & R. Kreuger (Eds.), Successful focus groups (pp. 184-201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Johnson, A. (1996). “It’s good to talk”: The focus group and the sociological imagination. Sociological Review, 44, 517-538.
22.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16, 103-121.
23.
Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.
24.
Madriz, E. (1998). Using focus groups with lower socioeconomic status Latina women. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 114-128.
25.
McMahon, A. (1999). Takingcare of men. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Mills, C. W. (2000). The sociological imagination. London:Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1959)
27.
Morgan, D. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.
28.
Morgan, D., & Kreuger, R. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. Morgan & R. Kreuger (Eds.), Successful focus groups (pp. 3-19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Poland, B., & Pederson, A. (1998). Reading between the lines: Interpreting silences in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 293-312.
30.
Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 103-119.
31.
Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 111-125.
33.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Zeller, R. (1993). Focus group research on sensitive topics. In D. Morgan & R. Kreuger (Eds.), Successful focus groups (pp. 167-183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
