How sincere is Russian war journalism? This study investigates whether reporters support Moscow’s Ukraine narrative because they believe it, fear dissent, or already share nationalist convictions. Integrating cultivation theory and spiral of silence logic with a third, ideological pathway, we fielded an encrypted survey of journalists and collected self-submitted articles for frame analysis. Latent class modelling revealed three clusters: internalizers, strategic compliers, and ideological supporters, with texts linked to each class displaying distinctive linguistic signatures that matched survey profiles. By tying motive to discourse, the study offers a transferable template for diagnosing information control and tailoring support for journalists under authoritarian pressure.
A’BeckettL. (2013). Strategies to discredit opponents: Russian presentations of events in countries of the former Soviet Union. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0009
2.
AlAshryM. S. (2023). Arab authorities use digital surveillance to control press freedom: Journalists’ perceptions. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-05-2021-0071
3.
AlexseevM. A.BennettW. L. (1995). For whom the gates open: News reporting and government source patterns in the United States, Great Britain, and Russia. Political Communication, 12(4), 395–412.
4.
AliM. A.OmarA. (2016). Discourse and manipulation in the representation of the Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i3.9498
5.
AlievaI.BluthN. (2023). Framing the U.S. and Russia coverage: The limited agency of foreign correspondents and the reproduction of bias in the news. Journalism Studies, 24(16), 2036–2052. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2274603
6.
AlyukovM. (2024). News reception and authoritarian control in a hybrid media system: Russian TV viewers and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Politics, 44(3), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211041440
BaumannM. (2020). ‘Propaganda Fights’ and ‘Disinformation Campaigns’: The discourse on information warfare in Russia-West relations. Contemporary Politics, 26(3), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1728612
9.
BaumannR. F. (2019). Mobilizing history to promote Russian patriotism and a new past. Military Review, 99(6), 69–88.
10.
BeckerJ. (2004). Lessons from Russia: A neo-authoritarian media system. European Journal of Communication, 19(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104042908
11.
BennD. W. (1996). The Russian media in post-Soviet conditions. Europe-Asia Studies, 48(3), 471–479.
12.
BirgeL.Chatterje-DoodyP. N. (2021). Russian public diplomacy: Questioning certainties in uncertain times. In SurowiecP.ManorI. (Eds.), Public diplomacy and the politics of uncertainty (pp. 137–156). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54552-9_7
13.
BodrunovaS. S.LitvinenkoA.NigmatullinaK. (2021). Who is the censor? Self-censorship of Russian journalists in professional routines and social networking. Journalism, 22(12), 2919–2937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920941965
BozdağU.TóthT.DemeterM. (2025). When articulating populist dichotomies is paramount: Exploring the effects of explicit and implicit populist styles on user engagement in Turkish Election tweets. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 102(1), 214–246.
16.
BrownJ. D. J. (2014). ‘Better one tiger than ten thousand rabid rats’: Russian media coverage of the Syrian conflict. International Politics, 51(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.45
17.
ChapkovskiP.SchaubM. (2022). Solid support or secret dissent? A list experiment on preference falsification during the Russian war against Ukraine. Research & Politics, 9(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680221108328
18.
ChapmanH. S.GerberT. P. (2019). Opinion-formation and issue-framing effects of Russian news in Kyrgyzstan. International Studies Quarterly, 63(3), 756–769. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz046
19.
ClemR. S. (2017). Clearing the fog of war: Public versus official sources and geopolitical storylines in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(6), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2018.1424006
DimitrovaD. V.Connolly-AhernC. (2007). A tale of two wars: Framing analysis of online news sites in Coalition countries and the Arab world during the Iraq War. The Howard Journal of Communications, 18(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170701309973
23.
DimitrovaD. V.StrömbäckJ. (2008). Foreign policy and the framing of the 2003 Iraq War in elite Swedish and US newspapers. Media, War & Conflict, 1(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635208090957
24.
DovbyshO. (2019). Commercial or public service actors? Controversies in the nature of Russia’s regional mass media. Russian Journal of Communication, 11(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2019.1572532
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
29.
FainbergD. (2015). Unmasking the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Soviet and American campaigns against the enemy’s journalists, 1946–1953. Cold War History, 15(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2014.978762
30.
FisherA. (2020). Demonizing the enemy: The influence of Russian state-sponsored media on American audiences. Post-Soviet Affairs, 36(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1730121
31.
GeisslerD.BärD.PröllochsN.FeuerriegelS. (2023). Russian propaganda on social media during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. EPJ Data Science, 12(35), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00414-5
32.
GerbnerG.GrossL. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199.
33.
GlazunovaS. (2022). Digital activism in Russia: The communication tactics of political outsiders. Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GrassiaM. G.MarinoM.MazzaR.MisuracaM.StavoloA. (2023). Topic modeling for analysing the Russian propaganda in the conflict with Ukraine. In di BellaE.FabbrisL.LagazioC. (Eds.), ASA 2022 data-driven decision making: Book of short papers (pp. 245–250). Firenze University Press; Genova University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.43
35.
GurievS.TreismanD. (2022). Spin dictators: The changing face of tyranny in the 21st century. Princeton University Press.
36.
HanleyH. W. A.KumarD.DurumericZ. (2023). “A Special Operation”: A quantitative approach to dissecting and comparing different media ecosystems’ coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian War. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03016
37.
Herfroy-MischlerA. (2015). Silencing the agenda? Journalism practices and intelligence events: A case study. Media, War & Conflict, 8(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635215584285
38.
HinckR. S.KluverR.CooleyS. (2018). Russia re-envisions the world: Strategic narratives in Russian broadcast and news media during 2015. Russian Journal of Communication, 10(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2017.1421096
HutchingsS.TolzV. (2015). Nation, ethnicity and race on Russian television: Mediating post-Soviet difference. Routledge.
42.
Interfax. (2022, March4). Duma approves Criminal Code amendments penalizing fake news about military operations, discrediting of Russian Armed Forces, calls for sanctions. https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/75419/
43.
JiaY.LiZ.MaQ.WangZ. (2023). The research on the impact of fake news about Russia-Ukraine war upon users. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 4, 925–930. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/4/2022625
44.
JohanssonE.NygrenG. (2014). Russian journalists and social media: Updated traditions and new challenges. Central European Journal of Communication, 2(2014), 273–290.
45.
KaraliovaT. (2020). Rationalizing the gap: How journalists in a nondemocratic regime make sense of their professional work. International Journal of Communication, 14, 4781–4802.
KhineykoI. (2005). The view from Russia: Russian press coverage of the 2004 presidential elections in Ukraine. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 47(3–4), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2005.11092388
KoltsovaO. (2006). News media and power in Russia. Routledge.
50.
KornieievV.RyabichevV.GlushkovaT. (2022). Fake news and content manipulation under Russian information aggression. Przegląd Strategiczny, 15(1), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2022.1.12
51.
KrutikovaY.FreireM. R.SantosS. J. (2019). Agenda-setting and framing in foreign policy: The case of Russian and Ukrainian televised coverage of the Crimea case. JANUS.NET e-Journal of International Relations, 10(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.10.1.4
52.
KuznetsovaE. (2021). Kontrpropaganda today: The roots of RT’s defensive practices and countering ethic. Journalism, 24(4), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211033442
53.
LankinaT.WatanabeK. (2017). ‘Russian Spring’ or ‘Spring Betrayal’? The media as a mirror of Putin’s evolving strategy in Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(10), 1526–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1397603
54.
LelonekA. (2020). The role of the journalist in the age of disinformation. New Eastern Europe, 1, 1–6.
55.
LinzerD. A.LewisJ. B. (2011). poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(10), 1–29.
56.
LitvinenkoA. (2013). A new definition of journalism functions in the framework of hybrid media systems: German and Russian academic perspectives. Global Media Journal: German Edition, 3(1). https://globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/en/article/view/101
57.
LiuZ. (2019). The Ukraine crisis in the Russian and British media: Manufacturing a confrontational mentality?Networking Knowledge, 12(1), 4–22.
58.
LowreyW.ErzikovaE. (2010). Institutional legitimacy and Russian news: Case studies of four regional newspapers. Political Communication, 27(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.494282
59.
LowreyW.ErzikovaE. (2013). One profession, multiple identities: Russian regional reporters’ perceptions of the professional community. Mass Communication and Society, 16(5), 639–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.770031
60.
LowreyW.ErzikovaE. (2014). Shifting institutional orders and responses to technological disruption among local journalists in Russia and the U.S. International Communication Gazette, 76(7), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514538930
MammadovR.JohnsonO. V. (2023). Retreat from the golden age: Russian Journalists & their world, 1992–2000. Journalism History, 49(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.2023.2267918
MickiewiczE. P. (1999). Changing channels: Television and the struggle for power in Russia (Rev. ed.). Duke University Press.
65.
MölderH.SazonovV. (2019). The impact of Russian anti-Western conspiracy theories on the status-related conflict in Ukraine: The case of Flight MH17. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 9(3), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0024
66.
MorrisJ. (2016). Not soft power, but speaking softly: ‘Everyday diplomacy’ in field relations during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 34(2), 110–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26384667
Noelle-NeumannE. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion–Our social skin (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
69.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
70.
NygrenG.GlowackiM.HökJ.KiriaI.OrlovaD.TaradaiD. (2018). Journalism in the crossfire: Media coverage of the war in Ukraine in 2014. Journalism Studies, 19(7), 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1251332
71.
OatesS. (2018). When media worlds collide: Using Media Model Theory to understand how Russia spreads disinformation in the United States. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association (APSA) Annual Meeting. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3238247
72.
OzyumenkoV. I. (2019). Social reality formation in media discourse: Information ambiguity strategy. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 18(3), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2019.3.5
73.
PanievskyA. (2022). The strategic bias: How journalists respond to anti-media populism. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 808–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211022656
74.
PasitselskaO. (2017). Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse. Discourse & Communication, 11(6), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714127
75.
PaulC.MatthewsM. (2016). The Russian “firehose of falsehood” propaganda model: Why it might work and options to counter it. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE198
76.
PetrenkoS. (2019). Truth in Soviet journalism: Imitation, manipulations, consequences. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 31(1), 166–172.
PobleD. K. (2020). Rhetoric on service of Russia’s information warfare. Rhetoric and Communications Journal, 43, 48–59.
79.
PtaszekG.YuskivB.KhomychS. (2023). War on frames: Text mining of conflict in Russian and Ukrainian news agency coverage on Telegram during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict, 17(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231166327
80.
ReichZ.HanitzschT. (2013). Determinants of journalists’ professional autonomy: Individual and national level factors matter more than organizational ones. Mass Communication and Society, 16(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.669002
RoudakovaN. (2009). Journalism as “prostitution”: Understanding Russia’s reactions to Anna Politkovskaya’s murder. Political Communication, 26(4), 412–429.
85.
ScheufeleD. A.MoyP. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3–28.
86.
SchimpfosslE.YablokovI. (2014). Coercion or conformism? Censorship and self-censorship among Russian media personalities and reporters in the 2010s. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 25(3), 295–311.
87.
SchimpfosslE.YablokovI. (2017). Power lost and freedom relinquished: Russian journalists assessing the first post-Soviet decade. The Russian Review, 76, 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.12142
88.
SchönfeldD. (2012). Tilting at windmills? The European response to violations of media freedom in Russia. Review of Central and East European Law, 37, 233–290. https://doi.org/10.1163/092598812X13274154886827
89.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
90.
SimonsG. (2016). The impact of social media and citizen journalism on mainstream Russian news. Russian Journal of Communication, 8, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2016.1140590
91.
SimonsG.StrovskyD. (2006). Censorship in contemporary Russian journalism in the age of the war against terrorism. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105064045
92.
SimonsG.StrovskyD. (2019). The interaction of journalism and public relations in Russia: A self-perception. Global Media and Communication, 15(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766518818855
93.
SkillenD. (2017). Freedom of speech in Russia: Politics and media from Gorbachev to Putin. Routledge.
94.
Slavtcheva-PetkovaV. (2019). Fighting Putin and the Kremlin’s grip in neo-authoritarian Russia: The experience of liberal journalists. Journalism, 20(11), 1530–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917708061
95.
StrovskyD. (2015). The Russian media coverage of the ‘Ukrainian issue’: The priorities of informing. Studies in Media and Communication, 3(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v3i1.823
96.
StrovskyD.SchleiferR. (2020). The Russian media as a promoter of manipulative approaches: The case of the Syrian Civil War. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520844.2019.1692609
97.
SzostekJ. (2018). The mass media and Russia’s “sphere of interests”: Mechanisms of regional hegemony in Belarus and Ukraine. Geopolitics, 23(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1402298
98.
SzostekJ.HutchingsS. (2015). Dominant narratives in Russian political and media discourse during the Ukraine crisis. In PilsudskaA.SakwaR. (Eds.), Ukraine and Russia: People, politics, propaganda, and perspectives (pp. 1–18). E-International Relations.
99.
TavakolM.DennickR. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
100.
The Insider. (2025, August23). Russia’s Justice Ministry designates “Kremlin insider” Sergei Markov as a “foreign agent.”https://theins.ru/en/news/284315
101.
TolzV.HutchingsS.Chatterje-DoodyP. N.CrilleyR. (2021). Mediatization and journalistic agency: Russian television coverage of the Skripal poisonings. Journalism, 22(12), 2971–2990. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920941967
102.
TothF.PajnikM.ZdravkovićL. (2025). From transition to authoritarian populism: Historical contingencies of media instrumentalization in central and eastern Europe. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251323253
103.
WatanabeK. (2017). The spread of the Kremlin’s narratives by a western news agency during the Ukraine crisis. The Journal of International Communication, 23, 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2017.1287750
104.
WeaverD. H.WillnatL. (Eds.). (2012). The global journalist in the 21st century. Routledge.
105.
YanchenkoK.ShestopalovaA.von NordheimG.Kleinen-von KönigslöwK. (2024). “Repressed opposition media” or “tools of hybrid warfare”? Negotiating the boundaries of legitimate journalism in Ukraine prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231167791
106.
ZevelevaO. (2019). How states tighten control: A field theory perspective on journalism in contemporary Crimea. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12615
107.
ZevelevaO. (2020). Towards a Bourdieusian sociology of self-censorship: What we can learn from journalists adapting to rapid political change in Crimea after 2014. European Journal of Communication, 35(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119897798
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
